Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins.

An updated review of the existing knowledge regarding uremic toxins facilitates the design of experimental studies. We performed a literature search and found 621 articles about uremic toxicity published after a 2003 review of this topic. Eighty-seven records provided serum or blood measurements of one or more solutes in patients with CKD. These records described 32 previously known uremic toxins and 56 newly reported solutes. The articles most frequently reported concentrations of ß2-microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, homocysteine, uric acid, and parathyroid hormone. We found most solutes (59%) in only one report. Compared with previous results, more recent articles reported higher uremic concentrations of many solutes, including carboxymethyllysine, cystatin C, and parathyroid hormone. However, five solutes had uremic concentrations less than 10% of the originally reported values. Furthermore, the uremic concentrations of four solutes did not exceed their respective normal concentrations, although they had been previously described as uremic retention solutes. In summary, this review extends the classification of uremic retention solutes and their normal and uremic concentrations, and it should aid the design of experiments to study the biologic effects of these solutes in CKD.

Impact of increasing haemodialysis frequency versus haemodialysis duration on removal of urea and guanidino compounds: a kinetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal failure retain a large variety of uraemic solutes, characterized by different kinetic behaviour. It is not entirely clear what the impact is of increasing dialysis frequency and/or duration on removal efficiency, nor whether this impact is the same for all types of solutes. METHODS: This study was based on two-compartmental kinetic data obtained in stable haemodialysis patients (n = 7) for urea, creatinine (CREA), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA) and methylguanidine (MG). For each individual patient, mathematical simulations were performed for different dialysis schedules, varying in frequency, duration and intensity. For each dialysis schedule, plasmatic and extraplasmatic weekly time-averaged concentrations (TAC) were calculated, as well as their %difference to weekly TAC of the reference dialysis schedule (three times weekly 4 h). RESULTS: Increasing dialysis duration was most beneficial for CREA and MG, which are distributed in a larger volume (54.0 +/- 5.9 L and 102.6 +/- 33.9 L) than urea (42.7 +/- 6.0 L) [plasmatic weekly TAC decrease of 31.5 +/- 3.2% and 31.8 +/- 3.8% for CREA and MG with Q(B) of 200 mL/min, compared to 25.7 +/- 3.2% for urea (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001)]. Increasing dialysis frequency resulted only in a limited increase in efficiency, most pronounced for solutes distributed in a small volume like GSA (30.6 +/- 4.2 L). Increasing both duration and frequency results in weekly TAC decreases of >65% for all solutes. Comparable results were found in the extraplasmatic compartment. CONCLUSION: Prolonged dialysis significantly reduces solute concentration levels, especially for those solutes that are distributed in a larger volume. Increasing both dialysis frequency and duration is the superior dialysis schedule.

Complex compartmental behavior of small water-soluble uremic retention solutes: evaluation by direct measurements in plasma and erythrocytes.

BACKGROUND: Although scanty data suggest that large solutes show kinetic behavior different from urea, there are virtually no data comparing the kinetics of urea with those of other small water-soluble uremic compounds, which are believed to behave similarly. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of kinetics of urea and guanidino compounds in plasma and erythrocyte compartments during a single hemodialysis session. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Six stable hemodialysis patients on standard low-flux dialysis therapy. PREDICTORS: Reduction ratios (RRs) of urea calculated from plasma and erythrocyte concentrations. OUTCOMES: RRs for guanidino compounds calculated from measurements of both plasma and erythrocyte concentrations. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were collected from the dialyzer inlet and outlet at 0, 5, 15, 30, and 120 minutes and at the end of the session. Plasma and erythrocyte concentrations of urea and guanidino compounds (creatinine [CTN], guanidinosuccinic acid [GSA], guanidinoacetic acid [GAA], guanidine [G], and methylguanidine [MG]) were determined. RESULTS: Postdialysis plasma RR was higher for GSA (82% +/- 3%) compared with urea (77% +/- 2%; P < 0.01), whereas CTN (69% +/- 4%), GAA (49% +/- 14%), G (55% +/- 7%), and MG (55% +/- 7%) showed smaller RRs (P < 0.01). In erythrocytes, GSA (45% +/- 1%), G (10% +/- 13%), and MG (27% +/- 10%) showed markedly smaller RRs than urea (59% +/- 6%; P < 0.05). Finally, significant differences were found between plasma and erythrocyte RRs for urea, GSA, G, and MG (P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: Discrepancies were found between the biochemical and mathematical approaches. Hence, the erythrocyte compartment does not necessarily conform to the kinetic nonperfused compartment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate by means of direct estimations that the compartmental behaviors of guanidino compounds and urea are substantially different. Hence, we should consider that not all changes in concentrations in uremia and dialysis are representatively reflected by urea kinetics, even when considering other small water-soluble substances, such as the guanidino compounds.

Inconsistency of reported uremic toxin concentrations.

Discrepancies in reported uremic toxin concentrations were evaluated for 78 retention solutes. For this analysis, 378 publications were screened. Up to eight publications per toxin were retained. The highest and the lowest reported concentrations, as well as the median reported concentration were registered. The ratio between the highest and the lowest (H/L) concentrations and, for some solutes, also the ratio between the highest and the median (H/M) concentrations were calculated. The compounds were arbitrarily subdivided into three groups based on their H/L ratio: group A, H/L < 3 (n = 33); group B, 3 < H/L < 8.5 (n = 20); and group C, H/L > 8.5 (n = 25). Solutes of groups A and B showed a low to intermediate scatter, suggesting a homogeneity of reported data. Group C showed a more substantial scatter. For at least 10 compounds of group C, extremely divergent concentrations were registered (H/M > 5.5) using scatter plot analysis. For all solutes of groups A and B, the highest reported concentration could be used as a reference. For some solutes of group C and for the compounds showing a divergent scatter analysis, however, more refined directives should be followed.

Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyser membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes.

BACKGROUND: Uraemic solutes accumulate in haemodialysis (HD) patients and interfere with physiological functions. Low-flux (LF) HD does not efficiently remove all uraemic compounds. We investigated whether large pore super-flux (SF) cellulose triacetate membranes (CTA) result in a better removal of uraemic solutes. METHODS: Eleven patients were dialysed consecutively with LF-CTA and SF-CTA during 3 weeks. Urea (UR), creatinine (CR), uric acid (UA), 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), hippuric acid (HA), pentosidine (PENT), low-molecular weight (MW) AGEs (AGEs) and albumin were determined in pre-HD, post-HD blood and in dialysate. Reduction rate (RR), dialytic clearance and mass transfer-area coefficient (KoA) were calculated. RESULTS: SF-HD resulted in a higher RR than LF-HD for IS and AGEs. Urea RR correlated with HA (r=0.59), IS (r=0.68) and IAA (r=0.67), (P<0.05) for SF. Dialytic clearance ranged from 20+/-5 to 179+/-20 ml/min for LF and from 24+/-6 to 191+/-24 ml/min for SF; being higher with SF for UA, HA, IS and IAA (SF vs LF, P<0.05). KoA was higher for most compounds with SF-HD. Albumin loss per SF session was 3.4+/-1.3 g. The retrieved amount of uraemic solutes in dialysate with LF and SF was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In conventional HD, SF-CTA was superior to LF-CTA for removal of most protein-bound compounds, especially IS. Reduction rate, dialytic clearance and KoA were higher with SF. The SF-CTA membrane is albumin-leaking; however, this property could not completely explain the amount of retrieved protein-bound compounds in dialysate.

Impact of iron sucrose therapy on leucocyte surface molecules and reactive oxygen species in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that iron increases oxidative stress and that an excess of iron contributes to cardiovascular disease and infections in haemodialysis patients. In the present study, the effects of parenterally administered iron on leucocyte surface molecule expression and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were evaluated. METHODS: Ten chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients without iron overload were studied. To each patient, four different regimens were applied: placebo; iron sucrose, either 30 or 100 mg, administered via the outflow dialyser line; and 100 mg of iron sucrose infused via the inflow dialyser line. Blood was sampled at different time points: before, during and after infusion and immediately before the next dialysis session. Levels of CD11b and CD45 expression on granulocytes and of CD11b, CD14 and CD36 on monocytes were determined using flow cytometric analysis. The generation of ROS was quantified using chemiluminescence with and without ex vivo stimulation by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). RESULTS: No significant differences among the four different treatment regimes were found, neither in chemilumescence activity nor in the expression of CD11b and CD45 on granulocytes, and of CD11b, CD14 and CD36 on monocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that parenteral infusion of iron sucrose during haemodialysis in patients who have no signs of iron overload has no significant effect on the expression of leucocyte surface molecules and does not increase production of ROS.

Kinetic behavior of urea is different from that of other water-soluble compounds: the case of the guanidino compounds.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with renal failure retain a large variety of solutes, urea is virtually the only currently applied marker for adequacy of dialysis. Only a limited number of other compounds have up until now been investigated regarding their intradialytic kinetics. Scant data suggest that large solutes show a kinetic behavior that is different from urea. The question investigated in this study was whether other small water-soluble solutes, such as some guanidino compounds, show a kinetic behavior comparable or dissimilar to that of urea. METHODS: This study included 7 stable conventional hemodialysis patients without native kidney function undergoing low flux polysulphone dialysis (F8 and F10HPS). Blood samples were collected from the inlet and outlet bloodlines immediately before the dialysis session, after 5, 15, 30, 120 minutes, and immediately after discontinuation of the session. Plasma concentrations of urea, creatinine (CTN), creatine (CT), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA), guanidinoacetic acid (GAA), guanidine (G), and methylguanidine (MG) were used to calculate corresponding dialyzer clearances. A two-pool kinetic model was fitted to the measured plasma concentration profiles, resulting in the calculation of the perfused volume (V(1)), the total distribution volume (V(tot)), and the intercompartmental clearance (K(12)); solute generation and overall ultrafiltration were determined independently. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between V(1) and K(12) for urea (6.4 +/- 3.3 L and 822 +/- 345 mL/min, respectively) and for the guanidino compounds. However, with respect to V(tot), GSA was distributed in a smaller volume (30.6 +/- 4.2 L) compared to urea (42.7 +/- 6.0L) (P < 0.001), while CTN, CT, GAA, G, and MG showed significantly higher volumes (54.0 +/- 5.9 L, 98.0 +/- 52.3 L, 123.8 +/- 66.9 L, 89.7 +/- 21.4 L, 102.6 +/- 33.9 L, respectively; P= 0.004, = 0.033, = 0.003, < 0.001, = 0.001, respectively). These differences resulted in divergent effective solute removal: 67% (urea), 58% (CTN), 42% (CT), 76% (GSA), 37% (GAA), 43% (G), and 42% (MG). CONCLUSION: The kinetics of the guanidino compounds under study are different from that of urea; hence, urea kinetics are not representative for the removal of other uremic solutes, even if they are small and water-soluble like urea.

Proteomics: a novel tool to unravel the patho-physiology of uraemia.

BACKGROUND: Uraemic toxicity results in the dysfunction of many organ systems, provoking an increase in morbidity and mortality. To date, only approximately 90 uraemic retention solutes have been described. To examine unknown uraemic substances thoroughly, the identification of as many compounds as possible in the ultrafiltrate and/or plasma of patients would lead to a less biased definition of the uraemic retention process compared with what is proposed today. METHODS: We describe the application of a novel proteomic tool for the identification of a large number of molecules present in ultrafiltrate from uraemic and normal plasma obtained with high- or low-flux membranes. Separation by capillary electrophoresis was coupled on-line to a mass spectrometer, yielding identification of polypeptides based on their molecular weight. RESULTS: Between 500 and >1000 polypeptides with a molecular weight ranging from 800 to 10,000 Da could be detected in individual samples, and were identified via their mass and their particular migration time in capillary electrophoresis. In ultrafiltrate from uraemic plasma, 1394 polypeptides were detected in the high-flux vs 1046 in the low-flux samples, while in ultrafiltrate from normal plasma, 544 polypeptides vs 490 were found in ultrafiltrate from normal plasma obtained from membranes with comparable cut-off. In addition, polypeptides >5 kDa were virtually only detected in the uraemic ultrafiltrate from the high-flux membrane (n = 28 vs n = 5 with the low-flux membrane). To demonstrate the feasibility of further characterizing the detected molecules, polypeptides present exclusively in uraemic ultrafiltrate were chosen for sequencing analyses. A 950.6 Da polypeptide was identified as a fragment of the salivary proline-rich protein. A 1291.8 Da fragment was derived from alpha-fibrinogen. CONCLUSION: The data presented here strongly suggest that the application of proteomic approaches such as capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry will result in the identification of many more uraemic solutes than those known at present. This could enable the introduction of more direct elimination strategies, since it is possible to obtain an extended appreciation of the removal capacities of particular dialyser membranes.

P-cresol, a uremic retention solute, alters the endothelial barrier function in vitro.

Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) exhibit endothelial dysfunction, which may involve uremic retention solutes that accumulate in blood and tissues. In this study, we investigated the in vitro effect of the uremic retention solute p-cresol on the barrier function of endothelial cells (HUVEC). P-cresol was tested at concentrations found in CRF patients, and since p-cresol is protein-bound, experiments were performed with and without physiological concentration of human albumin (4 g/dl). With albumin, we showed that p-cresol caused a strong increase in endothelial permeability after a 24-hour exposure. Concomitant with this increase in endothelial permeability, p-cresol induced a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and an alteration of adherens junctions. These molecular events were demonstrated by the decreased staining of cortical actin, associated with the formation of stress fibers across the cell, and by the decreased staining of junctional VE-cadherin. This decrease in junctional VE-cadherin staining was not associated with a reduction of membrane expression. Without albumin, the effects of p-cresol were more pronounced. The specific Rho kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, inhibited the effects of p-cresol, indicating that p-cresol mediates the increase in endothelial permeability in a Rho kinase-dependent way. In conclusion, these results show that p-cresol causes a severe dysfunction of endothelial barrier function in vitro and suggest this uremic retention solute may participate in the endothelium dysfunction observed in CRF patients.

Low water-soluble uremic toxins.

The uremic syndrome is the result of the retention of solutes, which under normal conditions are cleared by the healthy kidneys. Uremic retention products are arbitrarily subdivided according to their molecular weight. Low-molecular-weight molecules are characterized by a molecular weight below 500 D. The purpose of the present publication is to review the main water soluble, nonprotein bound uremic retention solutes, together with their main toxic effects. We will consecutively discuss creatinine, glomerulopressin, the guanidines, the methylamines, myo-inositol, oxalate, phenylacetyl-glutamine, phosphate, the polyamines, pseudouridine, the purines, the trihalomethanes, and urea per se.

Comparative kinetics of the uremic toxin p-cresol versus creatinine in rats with and without renal failure.

BACKGROUND: p-cresol, which is extensively metabolized into p-cresylglucuronide in the rat, is related to several biochemical and physiologic alterations in uremia and is not removed adequately by current hemodialysis strategies. The knowledge of its in vivo kinetic behavior could be helpful to improve the current removal strategies. METHODS: We investigated the kinetic behavior of intravenously injected p-cresol (10 mg/kg) in rats with normal and decreased renal function, and compared the results with those obtained for creatinine (60 mg/kg) under similar conditions. Renal failure was obtained by 5/6 nephrectomy. Both p-cresol and p-cresylglucuronide were analyzed using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). The relation between the p-cresylglucuronide peak height and the underlying amount of p-cresol was determined after hydrolysis of the glucuronide with beta-glucuronidase. We calculated urinary excretion of p-cresol with and without taking p-cresylglucuronide into account. In addition, total, renal, and non-renal clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution were calculated for p-cresol. RESULTS: Over a 4-hour period, p-cresol serum concentration showed only a minimal decline in rats with decreased renal function (t1/2 = 11.7 +/- 0.4 hours), compared to rats with normal renal function (t1/2 = 1.4 +/- 0.7 hours). A similar observation was made for p-cresylglucuronide. In rats with normal renal function, 21.0 +/- 10.0% of the injected p-cresol was excreted in urine as p-cresol and 60.7 +/- 25.0% as p-cresylglucuronide; in rats with renal failure, the respective amounts were 6.7 +/- 7.5% and 32.0 +/- 25.3% (P < 0.05 vs. normal renal function) (total recovery 81.81 +/- 31.07% vs. 38.50 +/- 32.09%, P < 0.05). The volume of distribution of p-cresol was approximately 4 times larger than that of creatinine, but was not significantly affected by renal failure. Not only renal, but also non-renal and total clearance, were much lower in rats with decreased renal function. CONCLUSION: The present data sheds a light on the kinetic behavior of p-cresol in uremic patients; the large volume of distribution, especially, might explain the inadequate dialytic removal of p-cresol. In addition, a substantial amount of p-cresol is removed by metabolism, and both renal and non-renal clearance are disturbed in uremia.

Urinary excretion of the uraemic toxin p-cresol in the rat: contribution of glucuronidation to its metabolization.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence indicates that lipophilic and/or protein-bound substances such as p-cresol are responsible for adverse physiological alterations in uraemic patients. To better understand the evolution of p-cresol disposition in renal failure and dialysis patients, it is necessary to determine its kinetic characteristics and biotransformation pathways. METHODS: We studied the biotransformation of p-cresol after intravenous injection of the compound in eight rats with normal renal function. Urine was collected in four 1 h intervals. To evaluate the presence of p-cresol metabolites, beta-glucuronidase was added to urine samples and the isolated unidentified chromatographic peak observed in previous experiments was submitted to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis. RESULTS: Administration of p-cresol produced a p-cresol peak and an unknown peak, suggesting biotransformation of the compound. Addition of beta-glucuronidase to urine samples and incubation at 37 degrees C resulted in a marked decrease in the unidentified peak height (P<0.001) together with an increase in p-cresol peak height (P<0.001), suggesting that the unidentified peak was composed, at least in part, of p-cresylglucuronide. Mass spectrometry (MS) and MS/MS analysis of the isolated unidentified peak confirmed the presence of p-cresylglucuronide. Linear regression between the peak height of p-cresylglucuronide before enzyme treatment and the increase in p-cresol peak height after enzyme treatment in samples incubated with beta-glucuronidase allowed us to calculate the amount of p-cresylglucuronide as its p-cresol equivalents. This revealed that 64% of the injected p-cresol was excreted as glucuronide. There was no change in peak heights when sulphatase was added to the urine. When p-cresol and p-cresylglucuronide levels were combined, approximately 85% of all administered p-cresol was recovered in the urine. In addition, the combined urinary excretion of p-cresol and p-cresylglucuronide was more than four times greater than excretion of p-cresol by itself (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In rats with normal renal function, intravenous administration of p-cresol results in immediate and extensive metabolization of the compound into p-cresylglucuronide. The elimination of p-cresol from the body depends largely on the urinary excretion of this metabolite.

New insights in uremic toxins.

The retention in the body of compounds, which normally are secreted into the urine results in a clinical picture, called the uremic syndrome. The retention compounds responsible for the uremic syndrome are called uremic toxins. Only a few of the uremic retention solutes fully conform to a true definition of uremic toxins. Uremic patients develop atheromatotic vascular disease more frequently and earlier than the general population. The classical risk factors seem to be less important. Other factors have been suggested to be at play, and among those uremic toxins are mentioned as potential culprits. The identification, classification and characterization of the solutes responsible for vascular problems seems of utmost importance but is far from complete due to a lack of standardization and organization. The European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox) has as a primary aim to discuss, analyze and offer guidelines in matters related to the identification, characterization, analytical determination and evaluation of biological activity of uremic retention solutes. The final aim remains the development of new strategies to reduce the concentration of the most active uremic solutes. These activities will at first be concentrated on reducing factors influencing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability.

BACKGROUND: The choice of the correct concentration of potential uremic toxins for in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experiments remains a major area of concern; errors at this level might result in incorrect decisions regarding therpeutic correction of uremia and related clinical complications. METHODS: An encyclopedic list of uremic retention solutes was composed, containing their mean normal concentration (CN), their highest mean/median uremic concentration (CU), their highest concentration ever reported in uremia (CMAX), and their molecular weight. A literature search of 857 publications on uremic toxicity resulted in the selection of data reported in 55 publications on 90 compounds, published between 1968 and 2002. RESULTS: For all compounds, CU and/or CMAX exceeded CN. Molecular weight was lower than 500 D for 68 compounds; of the remaining 22 middle molecules, 12 exceeded 12,000 D. CU ranged from 32.0 ng/L (methionine-enkephalin) up to 2.3 g/L (urea). CU in the ng/L range was found especially for the middle molecules (10/22; 45.5%), compared with 2/68 (2.9%) for a molecular weight <500 D (P < 0.002). Twenty-five solutes (27.8%) were protein bound. Most of them had a molecular weight <500 D except for leptin and retinol-binding protein. The ratio CU/CN, an index of the concentration range over which toxicity is exerted, exceeded 15 in the case of 20 compounds. The highest values were registered for several guanidines, protein-bound compounds, and middle molecules, to a large extent compounds with known toxicity. A ratio of CMAX/CU <4, pointing to a Gaussian distribution, was found for the majority of the compounds (74/90; 82%). For some compounds, however, this ratio largely exceeded 4 [e.g., for leptin (6.81) or indole-3-acetic acid (10.37)], pointing to other influencing factors than renal function, such as gender, genetic predisposition, proteolytic breakdown, posttranslation modification, general condition, or nutritional status. CONCLUSION: Concentrations of retention solutes in uremia vary over a broad range, from nanograms per liter to grams per liter. Low concentrations are found especially for the middle molecules. A substantial number of molecules are protein bound and/or middle molecules, and many of these exert toxicity and are characterized by a high range of toxic over normal concentration (CU/CN ratio). Hence, uremic retention is a complex problem that concerns many more solutes than the current markers of urea and creatinine alone. This list provides a basis for systematic analytic approaches to map the relative importance of the enlisted families of toxins.

Effects of uremic ultrafiltrate on the regulation of the parathyroid cell cycle by calcitriol.

BACKGROUND: Calcitriol (CTR) is used in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism secondary to renal failure because it decreases parathyroid hormone (PTH) synthesis and parathyroid cell proliferation. Previous studies in tissues other than parathyroids have demonstrated that uremic factors affect the action of CTR on the target cells. We questioned whether the uremic milieu interferes with the inhibition of parathyroid cell proliferation by CTR. METHODS: Studies were performed in vitro using freshly excised normal dog parathyroid tissue incubated for 24 hours with and without CTR and in the presence of either total uremic ultrafiltrate (UUF) from uremic patients or high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)-derived fractions (hydrophilic compounds eluting early and hydrophobic compounds eluting late) of this UUF (F1 to F4). Parathyroid cell proliferation was assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The addition of CTR 10-8 and 10-7 mol/L to parathyroid tissue produced an inhibition of the proliferation that was prevented in the presence of UUF. In a medium containing CTR 10-8 mol/L, the addition of F1, F2 and F3, but not F4, prevented the CTR-induced inhibition of parathyroid cell proliferation. With CTR 10-7 mol/L, the inhibition of proliferation was observed even in the presence of F1, F2 and also F4, but was prevented by F3. Uric acid (7 mg/dL), indoxyl sulfate (5 mg/dL) and p-cresol (1.4 mg/dL), which coeluted with F1, F2 and F4, respectively, did not interfere with the inhibitory action of CTR 10-7 mol/L; however, the addition of phenol (0.14 mg/dL), which coeluted with F3, prevented the CTR-induced inhibition of parathyroid cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of uremic toxins prevents the inhibition of parathyroid cell proliferation induced by calcitriol.

Studies on dialysate mixing in the Genius single-pass batch system for hemodialysis therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Genius single-pass batch system for hemodialysis contains a closed reservoir and dialysate circuit of 75 L dialysate. The unused dialysate is withdrawn at the top of the reservoir and the spent fluid is reintroduced into the container at the bottom. Although it has been claimed that both fractions remain unmixed during the dialysis session, no direct proof of this assumption has yet been provided. In the present study, we investigated whether contamination of the unused dialysate with uremic solutes occurred and at which time point it began. Two different dialysate temperatures were compared. METHODS: Ten chronic hemodialysis patients were dialyzed twice with the Genius system, with dialysate prepared at 37 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C, respectively. The sessions lasted 270 minutes with blood/dialysate flow set at 300 mL/min. Dialysate was sampled at 5, 60, 180, 210, 225, 230, 235, 240, 255, and 270 minutes both from the inlet and outlet dialysate line and blood was sampled from the arterial line predialysis, after 4 hours, and postdialysis. All samples were tested for osmolality, urea, creatinine, p-cresol, hippuric acid, and indoxyl sulfate. RESULTS: Uremic solutes appeared in the inlet dialysate line between 3 hours 50 minutes and 4 hours 10 minutes after the start of dialysis, corresponding to 68.6 and 74.7 L spent dialysate, respectively (37 degrees C vs. 38.5 degrees C; P = NS). No difference in the amount of removed solutes and in the serum levels was observed between 37 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C. A Kt/V of 1.17 +/- 0.20 and 1.18 +/- 0.26, respectively, was reached with the 37 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C dialysate temperature (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Contamination with uremic solutes occurred at the dialysate inlet only near the end of the session when small quantities of fresh dialysate were left in the container. Differences in dialysate temperature did not result in a different separation between used and unused dialysate, or in differences in removal of toxins or Kt/V.

Toxicity of free p-cresol: a prospective and cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Uremic syndrome is the consequence of the retention of solutes usually cleared by the healthy kidneys. p-Cresol can be considered a prototypic protein-bound uremic toxin. It is conceivable, analogous with drugs, that the non-protein-bound fraction of p-cresol exerts toxicity. This aspect had never been evaluated, nor have the factors influencing the free fraction of p-cresol. METHODS: In a transsectional study we evaluated the relationship between prehemodialysis free p-cresol and the ratio of free to total p-cresol (F:T) to clinical and biological factors in 44 chronic renal failure patients. The evolution of free p-cresol was assessed prospectively in 12 patients showing a change in serum albumin of at least 5 g/L over time. Hospitalization days attributable to infection and the free p-cresol concentrations were noted over a 1-year period. The impact of free p-cresol in vitro on leukocyte functional capacity was evaluated by chemiluminescence. RESULTS: We observed a correlation between total and free p-cresol (r = 0.84; P <0.001). In the multivariate analyses, free p-cresol and F:T showed a negative correlation with albumin. A shift from normal serum albumin to hypoalbumininemia in 12 patients led to an increase in free p-cresol from 5.9 +/- 3.2 to 8.2 +/- 4.5 micro mol/L (P <0.05; 0.64 +/- 0.35 to 0.89 +/- 0.49 mg/L). Free p-cresol (P <0.05) was higher in the patients hospitalized for infectious disease. In vitro, free p-cresol was higher in a 25 g/L than in a 50 g/L albumin solution (P <0.05). Leukocyte chemiluminescence production was more inhibited in the low albumin (high free p-cresol) solution (28% +/- 6% vs 21% +/- 8%; P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoalbuminemia and total p-cresol increase the free fraction of p-cresol. Patients hospitalized for infections have higher free p-cresol. In vitro, high free p-cresol has a negative impact on leukocyte chemiluminescence production. These data demonstrate the toxicity of free p-cresol.

Back to the future: middle molecules, high flux membranes, and optimal dialysis.

Middle molecules can be defined as compounds with a molecular weight (MW) above 500 Da. An even broader definition includes those molecules that do not cross the membranes of standard low-flux dialyzers, not only because of molecular weight, but also because of protein binding and/or multicompartmental behavior. Recently, several of these middle molecules have been linked to the increased tendency of uremic patients to develop inflammation, malnutrition, and atheromatosis. Other toxic actions can also be attributed to the middle molecules. In the present publication we will consider whether improved removal of middle molecules by large pore membranes has an impact on clinical conditions related to the uremic syndrome. The clinical benefits of large pore membranes are reduction of uremia-related amyloidosis; maintenance of residual renal function; and reduction of inflammation, malnutrition, anemia, dyslipidemia, and mortality. It is concluded that middle molecules play a role in uremic toxicity and especially in the processes related to inflammation, atherogenesis, and malnutrition. Their removal seems to be related to a better outcome, although better biocompatibility of membranes might be a confounding factor.

Uremic toxins: removal with different therapies.

A convenient way to classify uremic solutes is to subdivide them according to the physicochemical characteristics influencing their dialytic removal into small water-soluble compounds (<500 Da), protein-bound compounds, and middle molecules (>500 Da). The prototype of small water-soluble solutes remains urea although the proof of its toxicity is scanty. Only a few other water-soluble compounds exert toxicity (e.g., the guanidines, the purines), but most of these are characterized by an intra-dialytic behavior, which is different from that of urea. In addition, the protein-bound compounds and the middle molecules behave in a different way from urea, due to their protein binding and their molecular weights, respectively. Because of these specific removal patterns, it is suggested that new approaches of influencing uremic solute concentration should be explored, such as specific adsorptive systems, alternative dialytic timeframes, removal by intestinal adsorption, modification of toxin, or general metabolism by drug administration. Middle molecule removal has been improved by the introduction of large pore, high-flux membranes, but this approach seems to have come close to its maximal removal capacity, whereas multicompartmental behavior might become an additional factor hampering attempts to decrease toxin concentration. Hence, further enhancement of uremic toxin removal should be pursued by the introduction of alternative concepts of elimination.