Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 238(7): 1899-1910, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33694031

ABSTRACT

Ayahuasca is a plant concoction containing N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and certain ß-carboline alkaloids from South America. Previous research in naturalistic settings has suggested that ingestion of ayahuasca can improve mental health and well-being; however, these studies were not placebo controlled and did not control for the possibility of expectation bias. This naturalistic observational study was designed to assess whether mental health changes were produced by ayahuasca or by set and setting. Assessments were made pre- and post-ayahuasca sessions in 30 experienced participants of ayahuasca retreats hosted in the Netherlands, Spain, and Germany. Participants consumed ayahuasca (N = 14) or placebo (N = 16). Analysis revealed a main effect of time on symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Compared to baseline, symptoms reduced in both groups after the ceremony, independent of treatment. There was a main treatment × time interaction on implicit emotional empathy, indicating that ayahuasca increased emotional empathy to negative stimuli. The current findings suggest that improvements in mental health of participants of ayahuasca ceremonies can be driven by non-pharmacological factors that constitute a placebo response but also by pharmacological factors that are related to the use of ayahuasca. These findings stress the importance of placebo-controlled designs in psychedelic research and the need to further explore the contribution of non-pharmacological factors to the psychedelic experience.


Subject(s)
Banisteriopsis , Ceremonial Behavior , Hallucinogens/administration & dosage , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Health/trends , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Adult , Alkaloids/administration & dosage , Alkaloids/isolation & purification , Double-Blind Method , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hallucinogens/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Plant Extracts/isolation & purification , Spain/epidemiology
2.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 51(3): 225-235, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676284

ABSTRACT

The phenethylamine 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA) is a so-called novel psychoactive substance with a chemical structure resembling that of amphetamine and MDMA. Since 4-FA users report their subjective experience ranges between the effects induced by amphetamine and MDMA, and it is known that both substances can produce an altered state of consciousness, this study tests whether 4-FA induces a psychedelic state. A placebo-controlled two-way crossover study in 12 healthy poly-drug users was conducted to test subjective and behavioral effects of 4-FA. 4-FA concentrations were determined in serum up to 12 hours after administration and a series of questionnaires and the picture concept test were administered between one hour and 11 hours post-administration. Findings showed that 4-FA induced a psychedelic state which was highest one hour after 4-FA administration, at peak 4-FA serum concentrations. The 4-FA-induced psychedelic state decreased over time and was in general associated with the decreasing 4-FA serum concentrations. There was no 4-FA-induced change in creative (flexible) thinking. It is concluded that while the 4-FA-induced psychedelic state is mild in intensity and in between that produced by amphetamine and MDMA as hypothesized, more research is needed to indicate whether 4-FA can change creative thinking.


Subject(s)
Amphetamines/pharmacology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
3.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 235(8): 2349-2356, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New psychoactive substances (NPS) are chemical analogues designed to mimic the effects of various classic recreational drugs of abuse including MDMA, LSD, and cannabis. NPS use is associated with concern about the acute and longer-term effects particular substances might have, with abuse and addiction as potential consequences. Impulsivity and sensitivity to the rewarding effects of drugs have been considered as risk factors for drug abuse. In light of the popularity of 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA), it is important to assess whether 4-FA can lead to subjective drug liking and wanting, and impulsive behavior, all factors contributing to the abuse likelihood of a substance. METHODS: A placebo-controlled 2-way crossover study in 12 healthy poly-drug using participants was conducted to test subjective and behavioral effects of 4-FA (100 mg). 4-FA concentrations were determined in serum up to 12 h after administration and two impulsivity tasks and two drug experience questionnaires assessing drug liking and wanting, and good and bad drug effect, were administered between 1 and 11 h post-administration. RESULTS: Findings showed that 4-FA did not affect impulsive behavior. Self-ratings of drug liking and wanting and good drug effect were increased 1 h after administration; this effect was absent 11 h after drug intake. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: To conclude, 4-FA (single dose) increased self-rated liking and wanting, which is known to contribute to the abuse likelihood of a substance; however, it left another factor impulsive behavior unaffected. It has to be noted that the current picture is limited and might change with increased sample size, and/or different 4-FA doses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial acronym: 4-FA. URL: http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6164 . Registration number: NTR6164 (Dutch clinical trial registry number).


Subject(s)
Amphetamines/pharmacology , Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Emotions/drug effects , Impulsive Behavior/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Amphetamines/blood , Behavior, Addictive/blood , Central Nervous System Stimulants/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Emotions/physiology , Female , Humans , Illicit Drugs/blood , Illicit Drugs/pharmacology , Impulsive Behavior/physiology , Male , Reward , Risk Factors , Young Adult
4.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 1061, 2018 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29348651

ABSTRACT

MDMA exerts its main effects via the serotonergic system and the serotonin transporter. The gene coding for this transporter determines the expression rate of the transporter. Previously it was shown that healthy individuals with the short allelic variant ('s-group') of the 5-HTTLPR-polymorphism displayed more anxiety and negative mood, and had a lower transcriptional efficiency compared to individuals who are homozygous for the l-allele ('l-group'). The present study aimed to investigate the role of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in MDMA-induced mood effects. Four placebo-controlled, within-subject studies were pooled, including in total 63 polydrug ecstasy users (Ns-group = 48; Nl-group = 15) receiving MDMA 75 mg and placebo on two test days, separated by minimally 7 days. Mood was assessed by means of the Profile of Mood States. Findings showed that MDMA induced -independent of sex- a positive mood state, and as a side effect also increased two negative affect states, anxiety and confusion. Anxiety ratings were higher in the l-group and independent of treatment or sex. Depression ratings were lowered by MDMA in the female l-group. Findings indicate that the MDMA-induced reduction in self-rated depressive feelings is sex- and genotype-dependent, with females homozygous for the l-allele showing this beneficial effect.


Subject(s)
Affect/drug effects , Alleles , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Drug Users , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/adverse effects , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Homozygote , Humans , Young Adult
5.
J Psychopharmacol ; 30(12): 1305-1312, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27562197

ABSTRACT

Recreational use of mephedrone, alone and in combination with alcohol, has increased over the past years. Pharmacological properties of mephedrone share similarities with methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), but its effect on neurocognitive function has not been well established in humans. The present study assessed the effect of mephedrone alone and after co-administration with alcohol on neurocognitive function. It was hypothesised that mephedrone would improve psychomotor performance but impair memory performance, when administered alone. Neurocognitive performance was expected to be impaired following mephedrone when combined with alcohol. Eleven participants received single doses of 200 mg mephedrone or placebo combined with 0.8 g/kg alcohol or placebo. Neurocognitive performance was assessed at baseline (T0), at one hour (T1) and four hours after (T2) mephedrone administration, by means of the Divided Attention Task (DAT), Critical Tracking Task (CTT), and the Spatial Memory Test (SMT). Mephedrone intoxication impaired short-term spatial memory at T1 and improved critical tracking performance at T2 Mephedrone alone did not affect divided attention, but did show an interaction with alcohol on reaction time at T2 Reaction time decreased when mephedrone was combined with alcohol as compared to alcohol alone. Alcohol intoxication impaired both short- and long-term spatial memory at T1 and divided attention at T1 and T2 Critical tracking performance was not affected by alcohol intoxication. The current findings support the hypothesis that mephedrone improves psychomotor performance, impairs spatial memory and does not affect divided attention performance. Stimulatory effects of mephedrone were not sufficient to compensate for the impairing effects of alcohol on most performance parameters.


Subject(s)
Cognition/drug effects , Ethanol/pharmacology , Methamphetamine/analogs & derivatives , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Adult , Attention/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term/drug effects , Methamphetamine/pharmacology , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/pharmacology , Reaction Time/drug effects , Young Adult
6.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 233(18): 3331-40, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27422568

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Alcohol and cannabis use have been implicated in aggression. Alcohol consumption is known to facilitate aggression, whereas a causal link between cannabis and aggression has not been clearly demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the acute effects of alcohol and cannabis on subjective aggression in alcohol and cannabis users, respectively, following aggression exposure. Drug-free controls served as a reference. It was hypothesized that aggression exposure would increase subjective aggression in alcohol users during alcohol intoxication, whereas it was expected to decrease subjective aggression in cannabis users during cannabis intoxication. METHODS: Heavy alcohol (n = 20) and regular cannabis users (n = 21), and controls (n = 20) were included in a mixed factorial study. Alcohol and cannabis users received single doses of alcohol and placebo or cannabis and placebo, respectively. Subjective aggression was assessed before and after aggression exposure consisting of administrations of the point-subtraction aggression paradigm (PSAP) and the single category implicit association test (SC-IAT). Testosterone and cortisol levels in response to alcohol/cannabis treatment and aggression exposure were recorded as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Subjective aggression significantly increased following aggression exposure in all groups while being sober. Alcohol intoxication increased subjective aggression whereas cannabis decreased the subjective aggression following aggression exposure. Aggressive responses during the PSAP increased following alcohol and decreased following cannabis relative to placebo. Changes in aggressive feeling or response were not correlated to the neuroendocrine response to treatments. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that alcohol facilitates feelings of aggression whereas cannabis diminishes aggressive feelings in heavy alcohol and regular cannabis users, respectively.


Subject(s)
Aggression/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcoholic Intoxication/psychology , Environmental Exposure , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aggression/drug effects , Cannabis , Case-Control Studies , Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Ethanol/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
7.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 232(2): 343-53, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24998257

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: One of the most often reported cognitive deficits of acute cannabis administration is an impaired recall of previously learned information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether cannabis-induced memory impairment in humans is mediated via glutamatergic or cholinergic pathways. METHODS: Fifteen occasional cannabis users participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-way cross-over study. On separate test days, subjects received combinations of pretreatment (placebo, vardenafil 20 mg or rivastigmine 3 mg) and treatment (placebo or 1,376 mg cannabis/kg body weight). Cognitive tests were administered immediately after inhalation of treatment was finished and included measures of memory (visual verbal learning task, prospective memory test, Sternberg memory test), perceptual-motor control (critical tracking task), attention (divided attention task) and motor impulsivity (stop signal task). RESULTS: The results of this study demonstrate that subjects under the influence of cannabis were impaired in all memory tasks, in critical tracking, divided attention and the stop signal task. Pretreatment with rivastigmine attenuated the effect of cannabis on delayed recall and showed a trend towards significance on immediate recall. When cannabis was given in combination with vardenafil, there were no significant interaction effects in any of the tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The present data therefore suggest that acetylcholine plays an important role in cannabis-induced memory impairment, whereas similar results for glutamate have not been demonstrated in this study.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Marijuana Smoking/adverse effects , Marijuana Smoking/metabolism , Memory Disorders/etiology , Memory Disorders/metabolism , Phenylcarbamates/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Acetylcholine/metabolism , Adult , Attention/drug effects , Cannabinoids/administration & dosage , Cannabinoids/blood , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glutamic Acid/metabolism , Humans , Male , Marijuana Smoking/drug therapy , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Memory/drug effects , Memory Disorders/drug therapy , Memory, Short-Term/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Rivastigmine , Sulfones/therapeutic use , Triazines/therapeutic use , Vardenafil Dihydrochloride , Verbal Learning/drug effects , Young Adult
8.
Neuropharmacology ; 87: 198-205, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24667166

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have shown that single doses of MDMA can affect mood and impair memory in humans. The neuropharmacological mechanisms involved in MDMA-induced memory impairment are not clear. Memantine, an NMDA and alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor antagonist, was able to reverse MDMA-induced memory impairment in rats. This study investigated whether treatment with memantine can prevent MDMA-induced memory impairment in humans. 15 subjects participated in a double-blind, placebo controlled, within-subject design. Subjects received both pre-treatment (placebo/memantine 20 mg) (T1) and treatment (placebo/MDMA 75 mg) (T2) on separate test days. T1 preceded T2 by 120 min. Memory function was assessed 90 min after T2 by means of a Visual Verbal Learning Task, a Prospective Memory Task, the Sternberg Memory Task and the Abstract Visual Pattern Learning Task. Profile of Mood State and psychomotor performance were also assessed to control whether MDMA and memantine interactions would selectively pertain to memory or transfer to other domains as well. MDMA significantly impaired performance in the visual verbal learning task and abstract visual pattern learning task. Pre-treatment with memantine did not prevent MDMA-induced memory impairment in these two tasks. Both positive (vigour, arousal, elation) and negative mood effects (anxiety) were increased by MDMA. The responses were not altered by pretreatment with memantine which had no effect on memory or mood when given alone. These preliminary results suggest that memantine does not reverse MDMA-induced memory impairment and mood in humans. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.


Subject(s)
Affect/drug effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/toxicity , Memantine/pharmacology , Memory Disorders/chemically induced , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/toxicity , Nootropic Agents/pharmacology , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/blood , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Memantine/blood , Memory/drug effects , Memory Disorders/blood , Memory Disorders/prevention & control , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/blood , Nootropic Agents/blood , Psychological Tests , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...