Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0147318, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26800521

ABSTRACT

A new method is presented to determine the retinal spectral sensitivity function S(λ) using the electroretinogram (ERG). S(λ)s were assessed in three different species of myomorph rodents, Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), Wistar rats (Ratus norvegicus), and mice (Mus musculus). The method, called AC Constant Method, is based on a computerized automatic feedback system that adjusts light intensity to maintain a constant-response amplitude to a flickering stimulus throughout the spectrum, as it is scanned from 300 to 700 nm, and back. The results are presented as the reciprocal of the intensity at each wavelength required to maintain a constant peak to peak response amplitude. The resulting S(λ) had two peaks in all three rodent species, corresponding to ultraviolet and M cones, respectively: 359 nm and 511 nm for mice, 362 nm and 493 nm for gerbils, and 362 nm and 502 nm for rats. Results for mouse and gerbil were similar to literature reports of S(λ) functions obtained with other methods, confirming that the ERG associated to the AC Constant-Response Method was effective to obtain reliable S(λ) functions. In addition, due to its fast data collection time, the AC Constant Response Method has the advantage of keeping the eye in a constant light adapted state.


Subject(s)
Electroretinography/methods , Animals , Gerbillinae , Mice , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Software
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20734051

ABSTRACT

Many animal species make use of ultraviolet (UV) light in a number of behaviors, such as feeding and mating. The goldfish (Carassius auratus) is among those with a UV photoreceptor and pronounced UV sensitivity. Little is known, however, about the retinal processing of this input. We addressed this issue by recording intracellularly from second-order neurons in the adult goldfish retina. In order to test whether cone-driven horizontal cells (HCs) receive UV cone inputs, we performed chromatic adaptation experiments with mono- and biphasic HCs. We found no functional evidence of a projection from the UV-sensitive cones to these neurons in adult animals. This suggests that goldfish UV receptors may contact preferentially triphasic HCs, which is at odds with the hypothesis that all cones contact all cone-driven HC types. However, we did find evidence of direct M-cone input to monophasic HCs, favoring the idea that cone-HC contacts are more promiscuous than originally proposed. Together, our results suggest that either UV cones have a more restricted set of post-synaptic partners than the other three cone types, or that the UV input to mono- and biphasic HCs is not very pronounced in adult animals.


Subject(s)
Neural Pathways/physiology , Retina/physiology , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Retinal Horizontal Cells/physiology , Ultraviolet Rays , Animals , Goldfish , Neural Pathways/cytology , Neural Pathways/radiation effects , Retina/cytology , Retina/radiation effects , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells/cytology , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells/radiation effects , Retinal Horizontal Cells/cytology , Retinal Horizontal Cells/radiation effects , Vision, Ocular/physiology , Vision, Ocular/radiation effects
3.
Environ Res ; 107(1): 132-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18045587

ABSTRACT

Contrast sensitivity (CS) was evaluated in 41 former workers from a lamp manufacturing plant who were on disability retirement due to exposure to mercury and 14 age-matched controls. The CS was measured monocularly using the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) paradigm at 6 spatial frequencies (0.2, 0.8, 2.0, 4.0, 15.0, and 30 cpd). Statistical difference (p<0.05) was found between the controls and the patient right and left eyes for 2.0 and 4.0 cpd. According the results in those spatial frequencies the eyes were classified in best and worst. Statistical differences were found between the controls and the best eyes for 2.0 and 4.0 cpd and for 0.8, 2.0, and 4.0 cpd for their worst eyes. No correlation was found between CS results and the time of exposure (mean=8.9 yr+/-4.1), time away from the mercury source (mean=6.0 yr+/-3.9), urinary mercury level at the time of work (mean=40.6 microg/g+/-36.3) or with the mercury level at the CS measurement time (mean=1.6 microg/g+/-1.1). We show the first evidence of a permanent impairment in CS measured objectively with the sVEP. Our data complement the previous psychophysical works reporting a diffuse impairment in the CS function showing a CS reduction in the low to middle spatial frequencies. In conclusion, non-reversible CS impairment was found in occupational exposure to mercury vapor. We suggest that CS measurement should be included in studies of the mercury effects of occupational exposure.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Contrast Sensitivity/drug effects , Evoked Potentials, Visual/drug effects , Mercury Poisoning/diagnosis , Mercury/toxicity , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Electrophysiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure
4.
Vis Neurosci ; 23(3-4): 437-40, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16961977

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present work was to determine the interaction of cone inputs in the response of horizontal cells using heterochromatic flicker photometry (HFP). Intracellular electrophysiological recordings were made in horizontal cells of isolated retinae of carp maintained in physiological solution, with the receptor side up. Sharp glass microelectrodes filled with 3 M KCl solution with resistances between 100 and 120 M Omega were used. Stimuli comprised six cycles of two 6-Hz sinusoidal light waves in counterphase adjusted for the same number of quanta: a green light (550 nm) from a monochromator with a Xenon lamp and an LED red light (628 nm). The stimulation program consisted of 10 steps with the 550-nm wave at constant amplitude, while the 628-nm wave varied in increments of 10% up to 100%, followed by another 10 steps with the 628-nm wave at constant amplitude while the 550-nm wave varied in increments of 10% up to 100%. We recorded responses from four different horizontal cell classes: H1 (monophasic, broadband, n = 37), H2 (biphasic, red-green color-opponent, n = 13), and H3 (biphasic, blue-yellow color-opponent, n = 2) cone horizontal cells; and RH (monophasic, broadband, n = 3) rod horizontal cells. H1 and RH horizontal cells showed a similar cancellation point at a heterochromatic mixture consistent with mixed inputs from 630- and 550-nm cones. No cancellation point was found for the H2 cell class. Fish H1 cells add cone inputs and signal "luminance" in light levels appropriate for cone stimulation. The same occurs with RH cells, which also signal "luminance," but in light levels appropriate for rod work. For both cell classes there is an HFP cancellation point occurring at a combination of 628-nm and 550-nm lights in opposing phase that leads to the cancellation of the cell's response. No cancellation was found for H2 and H3 cells, which are the chromatically opponent horizontal cells in lower vertebrates.


Subject(s)
Carps/physiology , Color Perception/physiology , Flicker Fusion/physiology , Retinal Horizontal Cells/physiology , Animals , In Vitro Techniques , Membrane Potentials/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Photometry/methods , Retina/cytology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...