Visual attention in children with migraine: a controlled comparative study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual attention of children with migraine and compare it with a control group. Thirty migrainous children and 30 controls without headache were subjected to a visual attention assessment with Trail Making Tests (TMT) A/B, Letter Cancellation Test, and the Brazilian computerized test Visual Attention Test, third edition. The migraine group was evaluated after 2 days without headache. The migraine group had an inferior performance compared with the control group on TMT A (P = 0.03) and B (P = 0.001), and more errors on tasks 1 (P = 0.032) and 2 (P = 0.015) of the Visual Attention Test, presenting difficulty with selective and alternate attention. Attention is a neurological function that depends on structures such as the brainstem, cerebral cortex and the limbic system and on neurotransmitters such as dopamine and noradrenaline. The neurochemical aspects involved in the physiopathology of migraine and attention mechanisms probably predispose these children to visual attention deficits.

Pupillary response to topical naloxone in cluster headache.

Eye drops of naloxone were applied and pupillary diameters recorded at standard time intervals in 18 healthy controls and in 20 patients with episodic cluster headache during pain free intervals by means of a pupillometer. In the basal condition, the mean symptomatic side pupil in the cluster headache group was significantly smaller than the pupil of controls. Patients in the cluster period had a significantly smaller symptomatic-side pupil when compared to patients outside the bout. After naloxone, the pupils on the symptomatic as well as on the non-symptomatic side were significantly smaller than those in controls when expressed in mm. The difference between patients and controls persisted, and was, grossly speaking, of a not widely varying magnitude during the drug test. This study thus does not render any definite evidence for a role of opioids in the mechanism underlying the miosis of cluster headache.

Cluster headache: forehead sweating pattern during heating and pilocarpine tests. Variation as a function of time.

Thirty-one patients with cluster headache were examined with regard to their forehead sweating pattern, by means of the Evaporimeter. Sweating was stimulated in two different ways: by body heating and by parenterally administered pilocarpine. The resulting increase in evaporation was frequently measured at different positions on both sides of the forehead, and the possibility of variations in the pattern related to the passage of time was specifically scrutinized. Some typical patterns emerged. The previously reported, marked asymmetries of response (deficient heat-induced sweating and pilocarpine supersensitivity of the symptomatic side) at the medial positions in the forehead were confirmed. However, the asymmetries invariably faded to some extent with the passage of time. Patients with cluster headache show gross similarities with, but also some minor differences from, the sweat pattern of patients with brain stem lesions causing a Horner's syndrome. A subdivision of the material into groups in accordance with the pupillometric pattern after sympathomimetic stimulation made it clear that the cases of definite evaporimetric asymmetries ("typical reactions") belonged to the group with a typical pupillometric pattern. These results suggest that from an "autonomic" point of view, subpopulations may exist within the clinical entity of cluster headache.

Cluster headache: on the significance of so-called minibouts.

Cluster headache periods (bouts) have, at the lower end of the scale, been supposed to last for periods as short as 1-2 weeks. Patients who usually have bouts of ordinary duration occasionally have brief attacks in the remission phase ("abortive attacks"). The group described here had a temporal pattern, clearly at variance with both these patterns: The six patients had mostly or entirely bouts of less than 1 week's duration. We have termed such short-lasting bouts minibouts, on the supposition that such cases belong within the cluster headache cycle. All the patients were men and had a history of unilateral headache without side shift, and usually the solitary attacks had some autonomic accompaniments, although of a moderate degree. In four cases only mild attacks occurred, whereas in two cases the attacks were rather severe and not consistent with full working ability. The group as such may not be homogeneous. The nosologic status of patients with bouts lasting only 1-2 days is somewhat uncertain. As long as the substrate of cluster headache is not outlined, the lower end of duration of minibouts cannot be accurately identified. The fact that three patients recently have experienced bouts of ordinary length strengthens the view that such cases really belong to the cluster headache cycle.

Cluster headache-like headache, Hageman trait deficiency, retrobulbar neuritis, and giant aneurysm. Autonomic function studies.

A 56-year-old, previously reported woman with cluster headache-like headache with bouts of unilateral (the side of predominance changing through the years) severe headache had a familial history (three generations) of partial Hageman factor deficiency and bleeding episodes. A giant aneurysm was found to be lodged in the anterior communicating artery on the left side. Clinically, the features were atypical for cluster headache: onset at a young age (14 years), episodes of retrobulbar neuritis appearing at the side of pain, etc. Studies of forehead sweating indicated that the right side was the pathologic one, from an autonomic point of view, as did pupillometric studies. However, during attacks, which were left-sided at the time, forehead sweating was marked laterally on the left side and on the upper eyelid, but not on the right. The "signal" usually reaching the autonomically stigmatized side during attacks of cluster headache, therefore, did not seem to reach the sweat glands on that (the right) side during the attack in the present case. This headache may, therefore, be distinct from cluster headache, both from a clinical and from an autonomic function point of view.

"Mild" cluster headache(?).

Three cases of what could be considered "mild" cluster headache have been described. All three patients were generally able to carry out their work during attacks; all three were men and had unilateral headache with the predominant pain in the ocular region. Relatively few symptoms and signs indicated autonomic system involvement, but at least tearing was invariably present on the symptomatic side. The bouts were generally short-lasting in two of the patients (and partly in the third one), fitting the pattern of "mini-bouts". Thus, in one of the cases four of the five major criteria (male sex, excruciating severity, cluster phenomenon, autonomic involvement, and unilaterality) were present. In the two other patients the full-blown cluster phenomenon was lacking. Such cases may represent the left-side slope of a "Gaussian severity distribution scale" with regard to cluster headache.