Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev. estomatol. Hered ; 33(1): 18-25, ene. 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: biblio-1441862

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength in different dentine conditions (etched-E, non-etched-N, dry-D and wet-W) of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal-SU, 3M/ESPE) and a total etching adhesive (Ambar-AB, FGM) using a sonic device (Smart Sonic Device-SD, FGM). Material and methods: In this in vitro study, ninety six sound extracted human molars were divided into 12 groups (n=8) according to different dentine conditions and adhesive systems. Enamel was removed and the middle dentine surfaces were polished. Each adhesive system was applied according to the different dentine conditions, and composite resin blocks were incrementally built up and stored for 24 hours. Specimens were sectioned into sticks and bond strength data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: No effects of sonic application and were observed. In general, AB showed lower results compared to the SU. E and N conditions did not statistically affect the bond strength of SU groups. Dry dentine presented statistically superior bond strength values when compared to wet dentine for SU/E/SD group. Conclusion: Adhesion of dry dentine with multimode adhesive system may be superior to wet dentine with sonic application. The modes of application had no influence in bond strength of studied adhesives.


Objetivo: Evaluar la resistencia de la unión microtensil en diferentes condiciones de dentina (grabado-E, sin grabado-N, seco-D y húmedo-W) de un adhesivo multimodo (Scotchbond Universal-SU, 3M/ESPE) y un adhesivo de grabado total (Ambar-AB, FGM) utilizando un dispositivo sónico (Smart Sonic Device-SD, FGM). Material y Métodos: En este estudio in vitro, noventa y seis molares humanos extraídos sanos se dividieron en 12 grupos (n=8) de acuerdo con diferentes condiciones de dentina y sistemas adhesivos. Se eliminó el esmalte y se pulieron las superficies centrales de la dentina. Cada sistema adhesivo se aplicó de acuerdo con las diferentes condiciones de dentina, y los bloques de resina compuesta se acumularon de forma incremental y se almacenaron durante 24h. Las muestras se seccionaron en barras y los datos de resistencia de la unión se analizaron con la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis y la prueba de U de Mann-Whitney. Resultado: No se observaron efectos de la aplicación sónica. En general, AB mostró resultados más bajos en comparación con el SU. Las condiciones E y N no afectaron estadísticamente la fuerza de unión de los grupos SU. La dentina seca presentó valores de fuerza de adhesión estadísticamente superiores en comparación con la dentina húmeda para el grupo SU/E/SD. Conclusión: La adhesión de la dentina seca con un sistema adhesivo multimodo puede ser superior a la dentina húmeda con aplicación sónica. Los modos de aplicación no tuvieron influencia en la resistencia de la unión de los adhesivos estudiados.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tensile Strength , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Dentin , Ultrasonics , In Vitro Techniques
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(3): 1265-1276, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36305964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the dentin permeability (by hydraulic conductance) and tubule occlusion (by confocal and scanning electron microscopies) of in-office desensitizing materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine dentin blocks were immersed in EDTA to open dentinal tubules. Placebo varnish (PLA), fluoride varnish (FLU), NaF 5% + 5% nanoparticulate sodium trimetaphosphate varnish (TMP), universal adhesive system (SBU), S-PRG filler varnish (SPRG), Biosilicate (BIOS), and amelotin (AMTN) solution were the materials tested. After application, the specimens underwent an erosive-abrasive challenge. Dentin permeability was evaluated at T0 (initial), T1 (after treatment), and T2 (after challenge). Confocal and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to evaluate, respectively, length and number of dentinal tubule occlusions and opened dentinal tubules, after challenge. Permeability and SEM data were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Confocal data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests. Spearman and Pearson's correlation tests were also used. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: At T1, the AMTN group showed the lowest permeability value, following the increasing order at T2: AMTN = SBU < BIOS = SPRG < TMP < FLU < PLA. The SBU group had the highest value of occluded dentinal tubule length. The AMTN group presented more occluded dentinal tubules compared to PLA and FLU. AMTN and SBU had the lowest values of opened dentin tubules. Results showed a negative correlation between the analyses. CONCLUSION: The SBU and AMTN solution were more effective in reducing dentin permeability by occluding dentin tubules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All materials reduced permeability after challenge, except fluoride varnish.


Subject(s)
Dentin Desensitizing Agents , Dentin Sensitivity , Animals , Cattle , Dentin , Dentin Desensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Dentin Permeability , Dentin Sensitivity/drug therapy , Fluorides/pharmacology , Fluorides, Topical/pharmacology , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polyesters
3.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 102: 103458, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605928

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study evaluates the surface roughness and gloss of resin composites for bleached teeth, using different modes of light curing and photoinitiators after challenges. Eighty discs were made with Filtek Z350XT (camphorquinone) and Vit-l-escence (camphorquinone, amine and lucerin-TPO). Forty disks were light cured by a monowave LED and forty with a polywave LED. Roughness and gloss analysis were made. The specimens were exposed to brushing and hydrochloric acid (HCl) and analyzed again. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA analysis of variance for repeated measures, considering each challenge separately. Afterwards, Tukey test was applied for multiple comparisons (p ≤ 0.05). All resins had a significant increase in roughness after brushing with polywave device and only Vit-l-escence presented significant increased after HCl. Regarding the surface gloss, no influence on light-curing units was found for all resins after toothbrushing and after HCl for Vit-l-escence. All resins showed significant decrease in gloss after the challenges. The type of LED device did not influence the roughness and surface gloss of resin composites for bleached teeth after the challenges.


Subject(s)
Curing Lights, Dental , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Composite Resins , Materials Testing , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL