Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Res ; 86(1): 128-133, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30986816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the accuracy of the ponderal index (PI) vs. BMI-for-age z-scores transformed (BMIz) in estimating body fat levels and classifying obesity in children and adolescents from a Brazilian urban population. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with 1149 participants (53.2% male), aged 6 to 18 years. Body fat percent (BFP) was obtained by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance. Non-linear regression analysis provided the accuracy of both BMIz and PI in estimating BFP. False positive rate was obtained from the proportion of individuals placed at or above the 95th percentile for BMIz or PI, whereas their BFP was discordantly below the 95th percentile. RESULTS: PI and BMIz appeared with similar stability from childhood to adolescence for both boys and girls. The portion of the variability in BFP explained by BMIz (R2 = 0.74 and R2 = 0.75) was close to the variability in BFP explained by PI (R2 = 0.73 and R2 = 0.75) for boys and girls, respectively. False positive rate was higher for BMIz compared with PI among boys (21.8% vs. 3.9%) and girls (28.5% vs. 17.5%). CONCLUSIONS: PI is a promising index for replacing BMIz in children and adolescents due to its potential to reduce false diagnosis of obesity.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Adiposity , Body Mass Index , Pediatric Obesity/diagnosis , Pediatric Obesity/physiopathology , Adolescent , Anthropometry , Brazil , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electric Impedance , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Nonlinear Dynamics , Pediatrics/standards , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...