Developing a core outcome set for the health outcomes for children and adults with congenital oesophageal atresia and/or tracheo-oesophageal fistula: OCELOT task group study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Heterogeneity in reported outcomes of infants with oesophageal atresia (OA) with or without tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF) prevents effective data pooling. Core outcome sets (COS) have been developed for many conditions to standardise outcome reporting, facilitate meta-analysis and improve the relevance of research for patients and families. Our aim is to develop an internationally-agreed, comprehensive COS for OA-TOF, relevant from birth through to transition and adulthood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A long list of outcomes will be generated using (1) a systematic review of existing studies on OA-TOF and (2) qualitative research with children (patients), adults (patients) and families involving focus groups, semistructured interviews and self-reported outcome activity packs. A two-phase Delphi survey will then be completed by four key stakeholder groups: (1) patients (paediatric and adult); (2) families; (3) healthcare professionals; and (4) researchers. Phase I will include stakeholders individually rating the importance and relevance of each long-listed outcome using a 9-point Likert scale, with the option to suggest additional outcomes not already included. During phase II, stakeholders will review summarised results from phase I relative to their own initial score and then will be asked to rescore the outcome based on this information. Responses from phase II will be summarised using descriptive statistics and a predefined definition of consensus for inclusion or exclusion of outcomes. Following the Delphi process, stakeholder experts will be invited to review data at a consensus meeting and agree on a COS for OA-TOF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was sought through the Health Research Authority via the Integrated Research Application System, registration no. 297026. However, approval was deemed not to be required, so study sponsorship and oversight were provided by Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust. The study has been prospectively registered with the COMET Initiative. The study will be published in an open access forum.

Anorectal malformation associated with delayed presentation of right Bochdalek type diaphragmatic hernia.

Patients with an imperforate anus frequently present with congenital abnormalities, most commonly as a component of VACTERL (Vertebral anomalies, Anorectal malformations, Cardiac defect, Tracheo-Oesophageal fistula and Oesophageal atresia, Renal anomalies, and Limb defects) anomalies. It is, however, unusual for infants to present with a concurrent anorectal malformation (ARM) and a Bochdalek type diaphragmatic hernia. We describe an infant with an ARM and a delayed presentation of a right-sided Bochdalek type diaphragmatic hernia. In this case, the Bochdalek type diaphragmatic hernia presented 10 months after a laparoscopic-assisted anorectal plasty was performed. Despite both ARM and congenital diaphragmatic hernia known to be associated with other congenital malformations, the association of these particular congenital abnormalities in an individual patient is uncommon.

SARS-CoV-2 in children and their accompanying caregivers: Implications for testing strategies in resource limited hospitals.

Background: Identification of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is imperative to prevent hospital transmission, but symptom-based screening may fail to identify asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic infectious children and their caregivers. Methods: A COVID-19 period prevalence study was conducted between 13 and 26 August 2020 at Tygerberg Hospital, testing all children and their accompanying asymptomatic caregivers after initial symptom screening. One nasopharyngeal swab was submitted for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). An additional Respiratory Viral 16-multiplex rRT-PCR test was simultaneously done in children presenting with symptoms compatible with possible SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: SARS-Co-V 2 RT-PCR tests from 196 children and 116 caregivers were included in the analysis. The SARS-CoV-2 period prevalence in children was 5.6% (11/196) versus 15.5% (18/116) in asymptomatic caregivers (p<0.01). Presenting symptoms did not correlate with SARS-CoV-2 test positivity; children without typical symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to be positive than those with typical symptoms (10.2% [10/99] vs 1% [1/97]; p<0.01). Children with typical symptoms (97/196; 49.5%) mainly presented with acute respiratory (68/97; 70.1%), fever (17/97; 17.5%), or gastro-intestinal complaints (12/97; 12.4%); Human Rhinovirus (23/81; 28.4%) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (18/81; 22.2%) were frequently identified in this group. Children-caregiver pairs' SARS-CoV-2 tests were discordant in 83.3%; 15/18 infected caregivers' children tested negative. Symptom-based COVID-19 screening alone would have missed 90% of the positive children and 100% of asymptomatic but positive caregivers. Conclusion: Given the poor correlation between SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and RT-PCR test positivity, universal testing of children and their accompanying caregivers should be considered for emergency and inpatient paediatric admissions during high COVID-19 community transmission periods. Universal PPE and optimising ventilation is likely the most effective way to control transmission of respiratory viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2, where universal testing is not feasible. In these settings, repeated point prevalence studies may be useful to inform local testing and cohorting strategies.

Delayed presentation of a baby with an oesophageal atresia on day 14 of life.

Delayed presentation of oesophageal atresia (OA) with a tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF) is rare. Only a few case reports and two larger case series have been published. We present a neonate who was referred to our unit on day 14 of life with a missed OA and a TOF, having survived without any feeds or total parenteral nutrition up until referral.We concluded that although such a delayed presentation is rare and avoidable, it does occur. This case highlights the necessity of good feedback to the referral hospitals with education on how to prevent this from recurring again. It also emphasises the necessity of a comprehensive clinical examination of all newborn babies. A high index of suspicion for OA with or without a TOF is essential in all babies with clinical drooling, feeding problems (from the first feed) and/or respiratory symptoms especially if combined with antenatal polyhydramnios.

Clinical presentation and management of childhood intussusception in South Africa.

PURPOSE: We assessed management and outcomes for intussusception at nine academic hospitals in South Africa. METHODS: Patients ≤ 3 years presenting with intussusception between September 2013 and December 2017 were prospectively enrolled at all sites. Additionally, patients presenting between July 2012 and August 2013 were retrospectively enrolled at one site. Demographics, clinical information, diagnostic modality, reduction methods, surgical intervention and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled, [54% males, median age 6.5 months (IQR 2.6-32.6)]. Vomiting (92%), bloody stool (91%), abdominal mass (57%), fever (32%) and a rectal mass (29%) represented advanced disease: median symptom duration was 3 days (IQR 1-4). Initial reduction attempts included pneumatic reduction (66%) and upfront surgery (32%). The overall non-surgical reduction rate was 28% and enema perforation rate was 4%. Surgery occurred in 334 (70%), 68 (20%) patients had perforated bowel, bowel resection was required in 61%. Complications included recurrence (2%) and nosocomial sepsis (4%). Length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in patients who developed complications. Six patients died-a mortality rate of 1%. There was a significant difference in reduction rates, upfront surgery, bowel resection, LOS and mortality between centres with shorter symptom duration compared longer symptom duration. CONCLUSION: Delayed presentation was common and associated with low success for enema reduction, higher operative rates, higher rates of bowel resection and increased LOS. Improved primary health-care worker education and streamlining referral pathways might facilitate timely management.

Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Postlicensure studies have shown an association between rotavirus vaccination and intussusception. We assessed the risk of intussusception associated with Rotarix (RV1) administration, at 6 and 14 weeks of age, in an upper-middle-income country, South Africa. METHODS: Active prospective surveillance for intussusception was conducted in 8 hospitals from September 2013 through December 2017. Retrospective case enrollment was done at 1 hospital from July 2012 through August 2013. Demographic characteristics, symptom onset, and rotavirus vaccine status were ascertained. Using the self-controlled case-series method, we estimated age-adjusted incidence rate ratios within 1-7, 8-21, and 1-21 days of rotavirus vaccination in children aged 28-275 days at onset of symptoms. In addition, age-matched controls were enrolled for a subset of cases (n = 169), and a secondary analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six cases were included in the case-series analysis. Post-dose 1, there were zero intussusception cases within 1-7 days, and 5 cases within 8-21 days of vaccination. Post-dose 2, 15 cases occurred within 1-7 days, and 18 cases within 8-21 days of vaccination. There was no increased risk of intussusception 1-7 days after dose 1 (no cases observed) or dose 2 (relative incidence [RI], 1.71 [95% confidence interval {CI} .83-3.01]). Similarly, there was no increased risk 8-21 days after the first (RI, 4.01 [95% CI, .87-10.56]) or second dose (RI, .96 [95% CI, .52-1.60]). Results were similar for the case-control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of intussusception in the 21 days after the first or second dose of RV1 was not higher than the background risk among South Africa infants. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: South African National Clinical Trial Register (DOH-27-0913-4183).