Physicians' and nurses' opinions on selective decontamination of the digestive tract and selective oropharyngeal decontamination: a survey.

INTRODUCTION: Use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in intensive care patients has been controversial for years. Through regular questionnaires we determined expectations concerning SDD (effectiveness) and experience with SDD and SOD (workload and patient friendliness), as perceived by nurses and physicians. METHODS: A survey was embedded in a group-randomized, controlled, cross-over multicenter study in the Netherlands in which, during three 6-month periods, SDD, SOD or standard care was used in random order. At the end of each study period, all nurses and physicians from participating intensive care units received study questionnaires. RESULTS: In all, 1024 (71%) of 1450 questionnaires were returned by nurses and 253 (82%) of 307 by physicians. Expectations that SDD improved patient outcome increased from 71% and 77% of respondents after the first two study periods to 82% at the end of the study (P = 0.004), with comparable trends among nurses and physicians. Nurses considered SDD to impose a higher workload (median 5.0, on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high)) than SOD (median 4.0) and standard care (median 2.0). Both SDD and SOD were considered less patient friendly than standard care (medians 4.0, 4.0 and 6.0, respectively). According to physicians, SDD had a higher workload (median 5.5) than SOD (median 5.0), which in turn was higher than standard care (median 2.5). Furthermore, physicians graded patient friendliness of standard care (median 8.0) higher than that of SDD and SOD (both median 6.0). CONCLUSIONS: Although perceived effectiveness of SDD increased as the trial proceeded, both among physicians and nurses, SOD and SDD were, as compared to standard care, considered to increase workload and to reduce patient friendliness. Therefore, education about the importance of oral care and on the effects of SDD and SOD on patient outcomes will be important when implementing these strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN35176830.

Pulse oximeter-enhanced accuracy of capnometry in children with cyanotic heart disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between the arterial end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) difference (deltapCO2) and the degree of desaturation in children with cyanotic heart disease (CHD) and to come to a more reliable estimation of the arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) from the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PET-CO2). DESIGN AND SETTING: In part retrospective, in part prospective observational study at a university children's hospital. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We retrospectively assessed the relationship between the arterial oxygen saturation as measured by means of pulse oximetry (SpO2) and the arterial to end-tidal PCO2 differences (deltaPCO2) from the records of medical or surgical interventions in 43 patients with CHD. We derived a PaCO2-PET-CO2 correction formula that was prospectively validated in 34 patients with CHD. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In the retrospective part we found a significant correlation between SpO2 and deltaPCO2 ( r (2)=0.84, p<0.001). The regression equation (corrected PET-CO2=raw PET-CO2-0.36xSpO2+39) was used in the prospective part to calculate the corrected PET-CO2. The r (2)s for the correlations between PaCO(2) and uncorrected and corrected PET-CO2 were 0.17 ( p<0.05) and 0.94 ( p<0.001), respectively. The uncorrected PET-CO2 bias was 13.0 mmHg, the bias +/- 2SDs was -0.1 and 26.2 mmHg. The corrected PET-CO2 bias was -0.6 mmHg, the bias +/- 2SD's was -4.0 and 2.9 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the PET-CO2 for the degree of hypoxia using the SpO2 in artificially ventilated infants and children with CHD results in a clinically applicable estimation of the PaCO2. As both SpO2 and PET-CO2 can be monitored continuously and non-invasively, this could facilitate artificial ventilation management in children with CHD.

The effects of low-pressure carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on cerebral oxygenation and cerebral blood volume in children.

UNLABELLED: We examined the effects of low-pressure carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on regional cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO(2)) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) in children. Fifteen children, ASA I--III, scheduled for laparoscopic fundoplication, were investigated in the head-up position (10) and ventilated to a baseline end-tidal CO(2) (PETCO(2)) between 25 and 33 mm Hg. Ventilatory settings remained unchanged during the operation. ScO(2) and CBV were assessed with near-infrared spectroscopy and recorded together with end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) at 5 time points: before insufflation, 30, 60, and 90 min after the start of CO(2) insufflation, and 10 min after desufflation. The intraabdominal pressure was kept between 5 and 8 mm Hg. During insufflation, PETCO(2) increased from 30.0 plus minus 2.8 to 38.3 plus minus 5.1 mm Hg (P < 0.001) and PaCO(2) increased from 32.0 plus minus 4.7 to 40.4 plus minus 5.9 mm Hg (P < 0.001). ScO(2) increased by 15.7% plus minus 8.8% (from 61 plus minus 9 to 70 plus minus 9 arbitrary units ) (P < 0.001). CBV increased by 4.6% plus minus 8.8% (from 123 plus minus 66 to 128 plus minus 66 arbitrary units [P = 0.048]). After desufflation, PETCO(2) and PaCO(2) decreased, but did not return to preinsufflation values. ScO(2) and CBV also decreased after desufflation. In conclusion, hyperventilation and the head-up position before CO(2) insufflation are not sufficient to prevent the CO(2)-mediated cerebral hemodynamic effects of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (5--8 mm Hg) in children. IMPLICATIONS: Peritoneal CO(2) absorption during laparoscopic surgery causes hypercapnia and CO(2)-mediated cerebral hemodynamic effects. Hyperventilation and the head-up position before CO(2) insufflation is not sufficient to counteract these effects of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (5--8 mm Hg) in children.