Antibodies to IgG4 hinge can be found in rheumatoid arthritis patients during all stages of disease and may exacerbate chronic antibody-mediated inflammation.

OBJECTIVE: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), autoantibodies such as anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) develop in response to neoepitopes that are formed under conditions of chronic inflammation. These autoantibodies may subsequently be fragmented by inflammation-associated proteases, leading to the formation of F(ab')2 fragments. The hinge of F(ab')2 fragments can serve as a neoepitope, and so-called antihinge antibodies (AHAs) can be found in RA patients, which might modulate the function of (fragmented) autoantibodies. We undertook this study to investigate the presence and specificities of AHAs in different stages of RA and to study their function. METHODS: The presence of AHAs was assessed by radioimmunoassay in healthy controls, blood donors who later developed RA, patients with arthralgia, patients with early RA, and patients with established RA. Specificity of the AHAs was analyzed with inhibition assays, and complement-activating ability was studied with a C4b deposition assay. RESULTS: Antibodies to IgG1 hinge, IgG2 hinge, and IgG4 hinge were detected in patients with established RA, with anti-IgG4 hinge antibodies being most specific (appearing in 1% of healthy controls, 3.8% of blood donors who later developed RA, 13% of arthralgia patients, 19% of early RA patients, and 16% of established RA patients). Anti-IgG4 hinge antibodies were subclass specific and were able to restore C4b deposition by IgG4 F(ab')2 fragments. In patients with arthralgia and patients with early RA, anti-IgG4 hinge antibodies were associated with rheumatoid factors and ACPAs. CONCLUSION: Anti-IgG4 hinge antibodies are present in RA patients and have low sensitivity but high specificity for RA. Since a significant proportion of ACPAs can be of the IgG4 subclass, the formation of anti-IgG4 hinge antibodies may represent one mechanism of ACPA-mediated inflammation.

Antibodies to constant domains of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: anti-hinge antibodies in immunogenicity testing.

Rheumatoid factors are antibodies directed against IgG that may confound immunogenicity testing for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We developed antigen-binding assays to monitor anti-drug-antibody (ADA) responses against infliximab and adalimumab using F(ab')2 fragments of the drug. This avoids possible detection of rheumatoid factor activity. During development of these assays, a number of sera from patients before treatment as well as several healthy control sera were tested positive. None of these sera contained antibodies specific for the therapeutic mAb. Instead, they were found to contain anti-hinge antibodies. We demonstrate that this aspecific antibody binding can be inhibited by adding F(ab')2 of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), which consists of pooled polyclonal IgG derived from plasma. Using this protocol, anti-infliximab antibodies can be measured specifically without interference by anti-hinge antibodies.

Differential effect of drug interference in immunogenicity assays.

The presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in adalimumab-treated patients is associated with reduced serum adalimumab levels and a lower clinical response. Currently, there is no standard for measurement of anti-drug antibodies and many factors influence the results. Consequently, the incidence of ADA as reported in different studies varies considerably. Here we investigated the differential effect of drug interference in two common types of assays used to measure anti-adalimumab: an antigen binding test (ABT) and a more often-used bridging elisa. We measured ADA to adalimumab in a cohort of 216 rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab for 28 weeks. Only 15 samples (7%) were positive in the bridging elisa, compared to 29 (13%) in the ABT, despite the fact that the bridging elisa was the most sensitive assay. Furthermore, in an ABT specific for IgG4, 48 samples (22%) were found positive. The bridging elisa was found to detect only the bivalent form of (drug-specific) IgG4, resulting in an underestimation of ADA levels. However, the predominant reason for the different outcomes of these assays was a differential susceptibility to drug interference. In particular, the bridging elisa only detected ADA in the absence of detectable amounts of circulating adalimumab and is therefore not suited for measurement of ADA in complex with the drug. In summary, we showed that a bridging elisa is susceptible to drug interference and typically measures ADA only in absence of detectable drug levels.

Decreased clinical response to infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis is correlated with anti-infliximab formation.

OBJECTIVES: Correlation of serum trough infliximab levels and antibodies to infliximab (anti-infliximab) with clinical response in ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: In accordance with the international ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) consensus statement, patients were treated with infliximab (5 mg/kg) every 6 weeks after a starting regimen. Preinfusion sera were collected at baseline, 24 and 54 weeks. At every visit, the 20% improvement response (ASAS-20) was assessed and laboratory tests performed. RESULTS: 24 of the 38 (63%) patients fulfilled ASAS-20 response criteria after 24 weeks of treatment and 21 (53%) after 54 weeks. After 54 weeks, 11 (29%) patients showed undetectable serum trough infliximab levels and detectable anti-infliximab; six of these patients developed an infusion reaction. Anti-infliximab was found significantly more often (p = 0.04) in ASAS-20 non-responders compared with responders at week 54. Serum trough infliximab levels were significantly (p<0.0001) lower in patients with (mean 0.02 mg/l) than in those without (12.7 mg/l) anti-infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: In ankylosing spondylitis, high levels of serum trough infliximab correlated with a good clinical response. Detection of anti-infliximab within 54 weeks is associated with undetectable serum trough infliximab levels, reduced response to treatment and increased risk of developing an infusion reaction.