Effect of an interactive, educational app about venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation on patient satisfaction: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adequate patient education is essential for patients to engage in shared decision-making when deciding to stop or continue anticoagulation after 3 months for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objectives were to evaluate the effect of an interactive, educational app on patients' level of satisfaction with information, perceived level of knowledge, decisional conflict and extent of shared decision-making when deciding on treatment duration of VTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial in 1 academic and 3 general Dutch hospitals included adult patients diagnosed with VTE without malignancy or prolonged anticoagulation for other indications. Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive the app (intervention group) in addition to hospital-specific standard of care. The app, created for this study, contains information on VTE and anticoagulation on an interactive timeline. In the week preceding the consultation when treatment duration is decided, patients were provided with daily videos using push notifications. Outcomes were assessed through self-reported questionnaires at baseline, 1-2 days before and 1 day after consultation. Data were analyzed using t-tests and linear mixed models for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Data of 56 patients were analyzed (mean age 57 ± 13; 27% female). On a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, patients who received the app were 0.9 points (95%CI 0.0-1.7; p 0.04) more satisfied with the provided information. Patients who received the app experienced significantly less decisional conflict. No differences in other outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: An educational app about VTE and anticoagulation increases patients' satisfaction and reduces decisional conflict when deciding on treatment duration of VTE. This study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7037).

Dalteparin and anti-Xa: a complex interplay of therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring low-molecular-weight heparins is generally not required. However, guidelines advise to monitor anti-Xa levels in patients with renal insufficiency or a BMI above 50, and in pregnancy. Measuring anti-Xa levels is a complex challenge since sampling should be performed three to five hours after subcutaneous injection and after steady state concentrations have been reached. Strict compliance is pivotal for justified dose adjustments. OBJECTIVES: We questioned compliance to our protocol and performed this study to explore that. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years receiving therapeutic dalteparin in a Dutch academic medical centre. Patients with a first anti-Xa level measured between February 23rd and December 30th, 2017 were selected. According to our local guideline, monitoring anti-Xa activity is indicated in patients on therapeutic doses of dalteparin who are pregnant, morbidly obese (BMI > 50), or have renal insufficiency (clearance < 60 ml/min). Accurate sampling was defined as measuring levels after at least three injections (after which a patient may reach steady state) and then four hours after the injection with dalteparin. The frequency of compliance to our protocol was assessed. RESULTS: We included 158 patients with 396 anti-Xa levels, of which 41% (65/158) of all first anti-Xa levels were drawn without appropriate indication. Almost half, 48% (211/396), were sampled incorrectly and 25% of these (53/211) were followed by a dose adjustment. In total, 74% (293/396) of the samples were not indicated or were taken at the wrong time. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring anti-Xa levels is a complex clinical challenge. This study showed that non-compliance with recommendations for anti-Xa monitoring was high, often resulting in unjustified dose adjustments.

Rationale for catheter-based therapies in acute pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. High-risk features of PE are hypotension or shock, and early reperfusion is warranted to unload the strained right ventricle and improve clinical outcomes. Currently, systemic thrombolysis (ST) is the standard of care but is associated with bleeding complications. Catheter-based therapies (CDT) have emerged as a promising alternative having demonstrated to be equally effective while having a lower risk of bleeding. Several CDT are currently available, some combining mechanical properties with low-dose thrombolytics. Recent guidelines suggest that CDT may be considered in patients with high-risk PE who have high bleeding risk, after failed ST, or in patients with rapid haemodynamic deterioration as bail-out before ST can be effective, depending on local availability and expertise. In haemodynamically stable patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (intermediate-risk PE), CDT may be considered if clinical deterioration occurs after starting anticoagulation and relative contraindications for ST due to bleeding risk exist. Decision on treatment modality should follow a risk-benefit analysis on a case by case base, weighing the risk of PE-related complications; i.e. haemodynamic deterioration vs. bleeding. As timely initiation of treatment is warranted to prevent early mortality, bleeding risk factors should be assessed at an early stage in all patients with acute PE and signs of RV dysfunction. To ensure optimal management of complex cases of PE and assess a potential CDT strategy, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. A dedicated Pulmonary Embolism Response Team may optimize this process.