ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether 'treatment day' is a significant predicting factor in Kawasaki disease and imposes a risk for coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) in a per-day analysis. CAA formation can be reduced from 25% to 10% when treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). STUDY DESIGN: Patient data from (n = 1016) a single center were collected for an observational cohort study. After exclusions, we retrospectively analyzed 776 patients in total. A multivariate analysis was performed with treatment day as a continuous variable (n = 691). Patients were categorized as no enlargement, small CAA, medium CAA, and giant CAA. RESULTS: Late treatment per-day was a significant predicting factor for the development of larger CAAs. ORs for medium and giant CAAs per delayed day were 1.1 (95% CI 1.1-1.2) P < .05 and 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.2) P < .05, respectively. CONCLUSION: We showed that every day of delay in treatment of patients with Kawasaki disease inherently carries a risk of medium and giant aneurysm formation. There was no cut-off point for treatment day that could mark a safe zone.
Subject(s)
Coronary Aneurysm , Coronary Artery Disease , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Coronary Aneurysm/etiology , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Infant , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/complications , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The COMBO biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent includes endothelial progenitor cell capture (EPC) technology for rapid endothelialization, which may offer advantage in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to analyze the performance of the COMBO stent by ACS status and ACS subtype. METHODS: The COMBO collaboration (n = 3614) is a patient-level pooled dataset from the MASCOT and REMEDEE registries. We evaluated outcomes by ACS status, and ACS subtype in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) versus unstable angina (UA). The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis (ST). RESULTS: We compared 1965 (54%) ACS and 1649 (46.0%) non-ACS patients. ACS presentations included 40% (n = 789) STEMI, 31% (n = 600) NSTEMI, and 29% (n = 576) UA patients. Risk of 1-year TLF was greater in ACS patients (4.5% vs. 3.3%, HR 1.51 95% CI 1.01-2.25, p = 0.045) without significant differences in definite/probable ST (1.1% vs 0.5%, HR 2.40, 95% CI 0.91-6.31, p = 0.08). One-year TLF was similar in STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA (4.8% vs 4.8% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.60), but definite/probable ST was higher in STEMI patients (1.9% vs 0.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). Adjusted outcomes were not different in MI versus UA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the novel EPC capture technology, COMBO stent PCI was associated with somewhat greater risk of 1-year TLF in ACS than in non-ACS patients, without significant differences in stent thrombosis. No differences were observed in 1-year TLF among ACS subtypes.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Drug-Eluting Stents/statistics & numerical data , Endothelial Progenitor Cells/metabolism , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Acute Coronary Syndrome/classification , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Angina, Unstable/complications , Coronary Thrombosis/epidemiology , Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/classification , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Small vessel diameter is associated with higher risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The COMBO sirolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer stent has a proprietary anti-CD34 antibody layer to enhance homogeneous endothelialization, which may be advantageous in treating small vessels. OBJECTIVE: We examined for differences in 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI by maximum implanted stent diameter from the COMBO collaboration. METHODS: The COMBO collaboration (n = 3614) is a patient-level pooled dataset of patients undergoing PCI with COMBO stents in the MASCOT and REMEDEE multicenter registries. Stent diameter was available in 3590 (99.3%) patients. We compared patients receiving COMBO stents <3 mm versus ≥3 mm. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI) or clinically driven TLR. Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis (ST). Adjusted outcomes were assessed using Cox regression methods. RESULTS: The study included 792 (22%) patients with small stents <3 mm and 2798 (78%) patients with large stents ≥3 mm. Small stent patients included more women with lower body mass index and higher prevalence of diabetes but similar prevalence of acute coronary syndrome. Risk of 1-year TLF was similar in small and large stent groups (4.4% vs. 3.8%, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.74-1.72, p = 0.58). There were no differences in the rates of cardiac death (1.7% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.74), TV-MI (1.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.58) or TLR (2.7% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.31). Definite or probable ST occurred in 1.3% of the small stent and 0.7% of the large stent PCI patients, p = 0.14, HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.93-5.00, p = 0.07. CONCLUSIONS: One-year ischemic outcomes after COMBO PCI were similar irrespective of stent diameter in this all-comers international cohort.
