ABSTRACT
The authors aimed to determine the economic value of providing on-site group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression to clients receiving residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Using a quasi-experimental design and an intention-to-treat analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratio of the intervention were estimated relative to usual care residential treatment. The average cost of a treatment episode was $908, compared to $180 for usual care. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $131 for each point improvement of the BDI-II and $49 for each additional depression-free day. The incremental cost-utility ratio ranged from $9,249 to $17,834 for each additional quality adjusted life year. Although the intervention costs substantially more than usual care, the cost effectiveness and cost-utility ratios compare favorably to other depression interventions. Health care reform should promote dissemination of group CBT to individuals with depression in residential SUD treatment.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Depressive Disorder/complications , Depressive Disorder/economics , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Health Care Costs , Humans , Psychotherapy, Group/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Residential Treatment/economics , Residential Treatment/methods , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The BRIGHT (Building Recovery by Improving Goals, Habits, and Thoughts) study was a community-based effectiveness trial that compared residential substance abuse treatment with residential treatment plus group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)for depression. This brief report focuses on the subgroup of participants with major depression. METHODS: The authors used a quasi-experimental design and an intent-to-treat analysis. Out of 299 participants enrolled, 135 had major depression. Primary outcomes were change in depression symptoms, mental health functioning, and days of alcohol use and problematic substance use. RESULTS: At the three-month follow-up, participants with major depression reported less severe depression and better functioning, compared with participants with major depression who received usual care. At six months, functioning continued to be higher and problem substance use was lower. CONCLUSIONS: Group CBT was an effective treatment for major depression for clients in residential substance abuse treatment. These results extend the effectiveness of group CBT for major depression to a new setting, patient population, and type of provider.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Humans , Residential Treatment , Substance-Related Disorders/complicationsABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Although depression frequently co-occurs with substance abuse, few individuals entering substance abuse treatment have access to effective depression treatment. OBJECTIVE: The Building Recovery by Improving Goals, Habits, and Thoughts (BRIGHT) study is a community-based effectiveness trial that compared residential substance abuse treatment with residential treatment plus group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression delivered by substance abuse treatment counselors. We hypothesized that intervention clients would have improved depression and substance use outcomes compared with those of clients receiving usual care. DESIGN: A nonrandomized controlled trial using a quasi-experimental intent-to-treat design in which 4 sites were assigned to alternate between the intervention and usual care conditions every 4 months for 2½ years. SETTING: Four treatment programs in Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: We screened 1262 clients for persistent depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II score >17). We assigned 299 clients to receive either usual care (n = 159) or usual care plus the intervention (n = 140). Follow-up rates at 3 and 6 months after the baseline interview were 88.1% and 86.2%, respectively, for usual care and 85.7% and 85.0%, respectively, for the intervention group. INTERVENTION: Sixteen 2-hour group sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in depression symptoms, mental health functioning, and days of alcohol and problem substance use. RESULTS: Intervention clients reported significantly fewer depressive symptoms (P < .001 at 3 and 6 months) and had improved mental health functioning (P < .001 at 3 months and P < .01 at 6 months). At 6 months, intervention clients reported fewer drinking days (P < .05) and fewer days of problem substance use (P < .05) on days available. CONCLUSIONS: Providing group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression to clients with persistent depressive symptoms receiving residential substance abuse treatment is associated with improved depression and substance use outcomes. These results provide support for a new model of integrated care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191788.
