Cost of Treating Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in Spain: Analysis of MICADOS Study Data by Disease Stage. / Evaluación de los costes asociados a la enfermedad de pacientes con linfoma cutáneo de células T en España: análisis en función del estadio clínico (estudio MICADOS).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The cost of treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in Spain is unknown. With the advent of new treatments, it is more important than ever to gain an accurate picture of the true costs involved. The MICADOS study had 2 primary objectives: 1)to evaluate the impact of CTCL on patient quality of life, and 2)to evaluate the costs associated with the disease. This article reports the results of the cost analysis. METHODS: We estimated the cost of treating CTCL over a period of 1year from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Twenty-three dermatologists and hematologists from 15 public hospitals analyzed data for adult patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS). RESULTS: A total of 141 patients (57.4% male) with a mean age of 63.6 years (95%CI: 61.4-65.7 years) were included. The mean direct annual cost of treating CTCL was €34,214 per patient. The corresponding costs by stage were €11,952.47 for stageI disease, €23,506.21 for stageII disease, €38,771.81 for stageIII disease, and €72,748.84 for stageIV disease. The total direct annual cost of treating MF/SS in public hospitals in Spain was estimated at €78,301,171; stageI disease accounted for 81% of all costs, stageII for 7%, and stagesIII andIV for 6% each. CONCLUSIONS: The MICADOS study offers an accurate picture of the direct cost of treating CTCL in patients with MF/SS in Spain and shows that costs vary significantly according to disease stage. Patient-borne and indirect costs should be analyzed in future studies.

[Translated article] Cost of Treating Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in Spain: Analysis of MICADOS Study Data by Disease Stage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The cost of treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in Spain is unknown. With the advent of new treatments, it is more important than ever to gain an accurate picture of the true costs involved. The MICADOS study had 2 primary objectives: 1)to evaluate the impact of CTCL on patient quality of life, and 2)to evaluate the costs associated with the disease. This article reports the results of the cost analysis. METHODS: We estimated the cost of treating CTCL over a period of 1year from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Twenty-three dermatologists and hematologists from 15 public hospitals analyzed data for adult patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS). RESULTS: A total of 141 patients (57.4% male) with a mean age of 63.6 years (95%CI: 61.4-65.7 years) were included. The mean direct annual cost of treating CTCL was €34,214 per patient. The corresponding costs by stage were €11,952.47 for stageI disease, €23,506.21 for stageII disease, €38,771.81 for stageIII disease, and €72,748.84 for stageIV disease. The total direct annual cost of treating MF/SS in public hospitals in Spain was estimated at €78,301,171; stageI disease accounted for 81% of all costs, stageII for 7%, and stagesIII andIV for 6% each. CONCLUSIONS: The MICADOS study offers an accurate picture of the direct cost of treating CTCL in patients with MF/SS in Spain and shows that costs vary significantly according to disease stage. Patient-borne and indirect costs should be analyzed in future studies.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma. / Utilidad de la 18F-FDG PET/TC en el linfoma cerebral primario.

OBJECTIVE: To study the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the initial evaluation and in the response assessment in primary brain lymphoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 18 patients diagnosed with primary brain lymphoma, a histological subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, on whom an initial 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI was performed, with 7 of the cases being analysed after the completion of treatment in order to assess response and clinical follow up. RESULTS: Initial 18F-FDG PET/CT showed 26 hypermetabolic foci, whereas 46 lesions were detected by MRI. The average SUV maximum of the lesions was 17.56 with T/N 3.55. The concordance of both tests for identifying the same number of lesions was moderate, obtaining a kappa index of 0.395 (P<.001). In the evaluation of treatment, MRI identified 16 lesions compared to 7 pathological accumulations observed by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The concordance of both tests to assess type of response to treatment was moderate (kappa index 0.41) (P=.04). In both the initial evaluation and the assessment of the response to treatment, PET/CT led to a change strategy in 22% of patients who had lesions outside the cerebral parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS: MRI appears to be the method of choice for detecting brain disease in patients with primary brain lymphoma, whereas 18F-FDG PET/CT seems to play a relevant role in the assessment of extra-cerebral disease.

Improvement over the years of long-term survival in high-risk lymphoma patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as consolidation or salvage therapy.

The role of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is not well established in certain types of lymphoma, such as those with a high relapse risk or relapsing after initial therapy. New chemotherapeutic schemes and immunotherapy have improved survival of these patients. Nevertheless, there is not enough evidence regarding whether transplantation is the best therapeutic approach. Moreover, published data on long-term follow-up of high-risk lymphoma patients treated with HSCT are scarce. We analyzed 177 consecutive patients diagnosed with a high risk of relapse or with relapsed lymphoma who underwent HSCT after induction with standard chemotherapy in a tertiary academic center from 1989 to 2013. The median age was 40 years. Diagnoses were Hodgkin disease (n = 56), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 44), follicular lymphoma (n = 29), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 15), T-cell lymphoma (n = 18), and others (n = 15). Patients received either an autologous graft (n = 154) in first complete remission (1CR; n = 59) or more advanced stages (AS; n = 95), or an allogeneic graft (n = 23) in 1CR (n = 4) or AS (n = 19). In the autologous group, overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 57% and 75% in the periods 1989-2001 and 2002-2013, respectively (P = .05). Patients receiving an allogeneic graft presented an OS of 25% and 43% in the 2 periods. With a mean follow-up of 5 years (95% confidence interval 3.5-6.6), for patients receiving a transplant in 1CR, OS at 5 years was 80%, and for those receiving a transplant in AS it was 59% (P = .003). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 5 years was 3.1% in the autologous group and 27.9% in the allogeneic group (P < .001). The main cause of NRM was infection (44%) in the whole cohort. All this leads to the conclusion that transplantation, as a therapeutic strategy, has shown a high long-term OS in this subgroup of patients with such a poor prognosis. OS improved over the years and reaching 1CR was a good prognostic feature. Infections were the main cause of NRM.

Clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction to quantify cytomegalovirus replication in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with different prevention strategies.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) end-organ disease is a serious, frequent complication after allogenic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). There are two prevention strategies: universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Preemptive therapy is administered based on the results of sensitive techniques that detect the viral infection. We analyzed 41 peripheral blood Allo-SCT recipients: 34 received prophylaxis and seven preemptive treatment. Viral infections determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays occurred at an overall incidence of 65.8%. The viral loads quantified by RT-PCR were compared among the prophylaxis versus the preemptive group. Overall, the median viral load was significantly higher in the preemptive compared with the prophylaxis group (P=.002). Furthermore, within the first 100 days posttransplantation, viral load values were higher among patients undergoing preemptive therapy (P=.009).

Differences in cytomegalovirus replication quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and antigenemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Fifty percent of allogeneic stem cell recipients develop cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the first 100 days posttransplantation. Various methods have been used to determine CMV infections, including antigenemia assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Although antigenemia assay has been used more frequently, this technique is less sensitive than RT-PCR. In contrast, RT-PCR has a low positive predictive value for CMV end-organ disease. Cytomegalovirus infections were analyzed in 41 peripheral blood samples from allogeneic stem cell recipients using both antigenemia assay and RT-PCR; results were discordant in 36.6% of patients. Although the antigenemia assay detected CMV replication in 29.2% of cases, RT-PCR was positive in 65.8%. In 83.3% of patients, results detected using the antigenemia assay were delayed by a median (range) of 5 (2-20) weeks compared with positive RT-PCR results. Within the first 100 days posttransplantation, higher levels of viral replication measured using RT-PCR were observed in patients with vs without antigenemia. In addition, in patients with antigenemia, viral load was significantly higher before day 100 than after (P=.01 and P=.008, respectively) compared with those without antigenemia.

Preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes high morbidity and mortality among allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy with oral valganciclovir or intravenous ganciclovir has replaced universal prophylaxis. We prospectively studied 19 consecutive adult recipients of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplants from May 2005 through February 2007 to analyze the safety and efficacy of preemptive therapy for the treatment of CMV infection. The antigenemia test was persistently negative in 8 patients (42%) and positive at least once in 11 (58%). Eight patients were treated with oral valganciclovir on an outpatient basis and they all became CMV negative after the first week of treatment. The other 3 patients received intravenous ganciclovir and were also CMV negative after the first week of treatment. No patient abandoned treatment, no severe secondary toxicity was noted, and there was no CMV-associated mortality.