Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 97
Filter
1.
Phys Rev Lett ; 131(5): 051201, 2023 Aug 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37595214

ABSTRACT

We report the first detection of a TeV γ-ray flux from the solar disk (6.3σ), based on 6.1 years of data from the High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory. The 0.5-2.6 TeV spectrum is well fit by a power law, dN/dE=A(E/1 TeV)^{-γ}, with A=(1.6±0.3)×10^{-12} TeV^{-1} cm^{-2} s^{-1} and γ=3.62±0.14. The flux shows a strong indication of anticorrelation with solar activity. These results extend the bright, hard GeV emission from the disk observed with Fermi-LAT, seemingly due to hadronic Galactic cosmic rays showering on nuclei in the solar atmosphere. However, current theoretical models are unable to explain the details of how solar magnetic fields shape these interactions. HAWC's TeV detection thus deepens the mysteries of the solar-disk emission.

4.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 23(7): 1474-1480, jul. 2021. ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-221987

ABSTRACT

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been associated with several immune-related adverse events, including sarcoidosis-like reactions (SLR). SLR, which has a low prevalence but an increasing incidence, is similar to sarcoidosis in terms of histology, and clinical and radiological manifestations. The most commonly affected organs are hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and skin. SLR is an exclusion diagnosis, so a lymph node biopsy can be useful to distinguish between tumor progression and SLR, particularly in tumors in which nodal involvement is very common. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of SLR in all cancer patients receiving ICIs in our institution between January 2016 and June 2020. Results Among the 1063 treated patients, seven experienced SLR, four of whom were symptomatic (cough, skin lesions, arthralgia), with time to onset ranging from 1.5 to 6.7 months after ICI initiation. All seven patients had bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and granulomatous reactions in five of the six patients with lymph node biopsies. SLR improved in all patients, including four patients who continued with ICI. Three patients received corticosteroids and/or stopped ICI therapy. Four of these patients had partial responses at the time SLR was identified. Conclusion Management of SLR lacks a consensus recommendation, although corticosteroids and/or stopping the ICI are generally implemented. The potential consequences of stopping anticancer treatment should be taken into consideration, particularly in the absence of clear management recommendations (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Lymphadenopathy/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sarcoidosis/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Spain
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(7): 1474-1480, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33433837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been associated with several immune-related adverse events, including sarcoidosis-like reactions (SLR). SLR, which has a low prevalence but an increasing incidence, is similar to sarcoidosis in terms of histology, and clinical and radiological manifestations. The most commonly affected organs are hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and skin. SLR is an exclusion diagnosis, so a lymph node biopsy can be useful to distinguish between tumor progression and SLR, particularly in tumors in which nodal involvement is very common. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of SLR in all cancer patients receiving ICIs in our institution between January 2016 and June 2020. RESULTS: Among the 1063 treated patients, seven experienced SLR, four of whom were symptomatic (cough, skin lesions, arthralgia), with time to onset ranging from 1.5 to 6.7 months after ICI initiation. All seven patients had bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and granulomatous reactions in five of the six patients with lymph node biopsies. SLR improved in all patients, including four patients who continued with ICI. Three patients received corticosteroids and/or stopped ICI therapy. Four of these patients had partial responses at the time SLR was identified. CONCLUSION: Management of SLR lacks a consensus recommendation, although corticosteroids and/or stopping the ICI are generally implemented. The potential consequences of stopping anticancer treatment should be taken into consideration, particularly in the absence of clear management recommendations.


Subject(s)
Drug Eruptions/etiology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Lymphadenopathy/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Sarcoidosis/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain
9.
SEMERGEN, Soc. Esp. Med. Rural Gen. (Ed. Impr.) ; 46(4): 270-276, mayo-jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-197306

ABSTRACT

La urticaria es un motivo frecuente de consulta en Atención Primaria (AP); sin embargo, el correcto abordaje de esta enfermedad resulta controvertido y con frecuencia no está bien establecido. Por esta razón, se necesita esclarecer sus causas y desarrollar protocolos de tratamiento para mejorar el manejo de la urticaria en AP. Con este objetivo se ha realizado este trabajo. Un grupo de expertos en AP y dermatología, con experiencia en el tratamiento de la urticaria, han revisado las principales guías y publicaciones en urticaria con motivo de desarrollar recomendaciones claras e interdisciplinares sobre el manejo de la urticaria en AP. En este artículo presentamos nuestras recomendaciones basadas en el consenso de expertos, incluyendo algoritmos de diagnóstico y tratamiento simples y prácticos. Estas guías pueden ayudar a optimizar el manejo del paciente con urticaria, incrementar su calidad de vida y reducir los costes socioeconómicos asociados


Urticaria is a common cause for patient consultations in Primary Care (PC). However, the optimal approach to managing urticaria in PC is controversial and not well-established. For this reason, there is a clear need to clarify the causes of urticaria and to develop treatment protocols to improve urticaria management in the PC setting. The present work has been developed with this objective. A group of experts in PC and dermatology, with specific expertise in treating urticaria, have reviewed the main clinical guidelines and publications on urticaria in order to develop clear, interdisciplinary recommendations on managing urticaria. In this article, consensus-based recommendations are presented that include simple, practical diagnostic, and treatment algorithms. These guidelines will help to optimise the management of patients with urticaria, increasing their quality of life and reducing the socioeconomic costs associated with this illness


Subject(s)
Humans , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Contact/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Primary Health Care/methods , Chronic Disease/therapy , Pruritus/diagnosis , Quality of Life/psychology , Sickness Impact Profile , Dermatitis, Contact/drug therapy , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL