Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 40(Suppl 1): 150-154, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827541

ABSTRACT

Bartonella quintana is a well-known cause of blood culture-negative endocarditis; however, pulmonary valve involvement is rare. The case of a 40-year-old African male who presented to the Emergency Department with chest pain, cardiac failure, and a 2-week history of fever is presented. Transoesophageal echocardiography confirmed an atrial septal defect, severe pulmonary insufficiency with large vegetations, severe mitral regurgitation due to anterior leaflet prolapse, and right ventricular dysfunction. Empirical antibiotic therapy was started, and urgent surgical intervention was decided. There were vegetations on the three pulmonary valve leaflets and the mitral valve. Closure of the atrial septal defect, mitral and tricuspid valve repair, pulmonary valve replacement with a biological prosthesis, and infundibuloplasty of the right ventricle were performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Preoperative blood cultures were negative, and B. quintana was detected through 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing in mitral and pulmonary implants. Serology showed positive titers of 1/1260 for both B. quintana and B. henselae. Ceftriaxone and gentamicin were administered for 10 days, followed by oral doxycycline for 12 weeks. A one-year echocardiogram showed normal functioning of the pulmonary prosthesis and the mitral and tricuspid repair. Infection caused by B. quintana is a rare cause of endocarditis with negative blood cultures, and multivalvular and pulmonary valve involvement is exceptional. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01727-4.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 58(12): 1668-75, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24647021

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis has a high mortality rate. Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been shown to affect the outcome of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia, and recent data point to a similar effect on methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vancomycin MIC on left-sided S. aureus infective endocarditis (IE) treated with cloxacillin. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of patients with IE in a single tertiary-care hospital. Vancomycin, daptomycin, and cloxacillin MIC was determined by E-test. S. aureus strains were categorized as low vancomycin MIC (<1.5 µg/mL) and high vancomycin MIC (≥1.5 µg/mL). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 93 patients with left-sided IE treated with cloxacillin, of whom 53 (57%) had a vancomycin MIC < 1.5 µg/mL and 40 (43%) a vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 µg/mL. In-hospital mortality was 30% (n = 16/53) in patients with a low vancomycin MIC and 53% (n = 21/40) in those with a high vancomycin MIC (P = .03). No correlation was found between oxacillin MIC and vancomycin or daptomycin MIC. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher vancomycin MIC increased in-hospital mortality 3-fold (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.2) after adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, septic complications, and nonseptic complicated endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that vancomycin MIC could be used to identify a subgroup of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus IE at risk of higher mortality. The worse outcome of staphylococcal infections with a higher vancomycin MIC cannot be explained solely by suboptimal pharmacokinetics of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cloxacillin/pharmacology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Survival Rate
3.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 38(5): 365-70, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21420835

ABSTRACT

Gram-positive bacteria account for >80% of all cases of endocarditis. Currently, staphylococci are the leading cause of endocarditis worldwide. Daptomycin is the drug of choice for empirical antibiotic therapy of staphylococcal endocarditis due to its optimal activity both against meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. Daptomycin has not been proven to be superior to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA endocarditis. However, daptomycin should be considered the drug of choice for the treatment of MRSA endocarditis caused by strains with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2µg/mL, for heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) phenotypes and for glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strains. Daptomycin is the drug of choice for rescue therapy in cases of MRSA endocarditis in which vancomycin has failed. The appropriate dose of daptomycin has not yet been established; however, for treatment of left-sided endocarditis the dose of daptomycin should be higher than the recommended dose of 6mg/kg/day. Combination antibiotic therapy with daptomycin (e.g. combined with fosfomycin) is a promising treatment for MRSA endocarditis and warrants further investigation. In vivo studies show that daptomycin is superior to vancomycin in the treatment of meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci experimental endocarditis, although clinical data are required. Daptomycin could represent an efficacious treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium endocarditis. Finally, the pharmacokinetic profile of daptomycin makes it an excellent drug for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Cocci/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Daptomycin/administration & dosage , Daptomycin/pharmacokinetics , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Infect Dis ; 200(9): 1355-66, 2009 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19811099

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The significance of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) is unknown. Using a multinational collection of isolates from methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE), we characterized patients with IE with and without hVISA, and we genotyped the infecting strains. METHODS: MRSA bloodstream isolates from 65 patients with definite IE from 8 countries underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 31 virulence genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and multilocus sequence typing. hVISA was defined using population analysis profiling. RESULTS: Nineteen (29.2%) of 65 MRSA IE isolates exhibited the hVISA phenotype by population analysis profiling. Isolates from Oceania and Europe were more likely to exhibit the hVISA phenotype than isolates from the United States (77.8% and 35.0% vs 13.9%; P < .001). The prevalence of hVISA was higher among isolates with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L (P = .026). hVISA-infected patients were more likely to have persistent bacteremia (68.4% vs 37.0%; P = .029) and heart failure (47.4% vs 19.6%; P = .033). Mortality did not differ between hVISA- and non-hVISA-infected patients (42.1% vs 34.8%, P = .586). hVISA and non-hVISA isolates were genotypically similar. CONCLUSIONS: In these analyses, the hVISA phenotype occurred in more than one-quarter of MRSA IE isolates, was associated with certain IE complications, and varied in frequency by geographic region.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Population Surveillance , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Vancomycin Resistance/genetics , Aged , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/genetics , Bacteremia/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Endocarditis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Genotype , Global Health , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Phylogeny , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin Resistance/drug effects
5.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 52(7): 2538-43, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18426900

ABSTRACT

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against gram-positive cocci, including Staphylococcus aureus. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of daptomycin against two clinical isolates: methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) 277 (vancomycin MIC, 2 microg/ml) and glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) ATCC 700788 (vancomycin MIC, 8 microg/ml). Time-kill experiments demonstrated that daptomycin was bactericidal in vitro against these two strains. The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h) was evaluated by using a rabbit model of infective endocarditis and was compared with the activities of a high-dose (HD) vancomycin regimen (1 g intravenously every 6 h), the recommended dose (RD) of vancomycin regimen (1 g intravenously every 12 h) for 48 h, and no treatment (as a control). Daptomycin was significantly more effective than the vancomycin RD in reducing the density of bacteria in the vegetations for the MRSA strains (0 [interquartile range, 0 to 1.5] versus 2 [interquartile range, 0 to 5.6] log CFU/g vegetation; P = 0.02) and GISA strains (2 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] versus 6.6 [interquartile range, 2.0 to 6.9] log CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.01) studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized more MRSA vegetations than the vancomycin RD (13/18 [72%] versus 7/20 [35%]; P = 0.02) and sterilized more GISA vegetations than either vancomycin regimen (12/19 [63%] versus 4/20 [20%]; P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference between the vancomycin HD and the vancomycin RD for MRSA treatment was noted. These results support the use of daptomycin for the treatment of aortic valve endocarditis caused by GISA and MRSA.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Daptomycin/administration & dosage , Daptomycin/pharmacokinetics , Disease Models, Animal , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Glycopeptides/therapeutic use , Heart Valve Diseases/drug therapy , Heart Valve Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Models, Biological , Rabbits , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Vancomycin Resistance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...