Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35871145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We describe the development of Preanestes@s, a web-based application for preoperative assessment, which incorporates PreQuest, a smart computer-based self-assessment questionnaire for the automated management of information. Preanestes@s potentially enables remote non-telephonic preoperative assessment. The main objective of this work was the identification of factors that independently predict adequate completion of PreQuest. As a secondary objective, we assessed patient experience using the application. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To assess the influence of patient conditions on PreQuest completion, our sample included 880 adult patients scheduled to undergo surgery at our institution between February 2020 and February 2021. We evaluated patient satisfaction and acceptability with the use of the application and PreQuest. RESULTS: A total of 573 participants (65.1%) successfully completed the PreQuest. Age below 65 years and higher educational attainment were identified as independent predictors for PreQuest completion (p = 0.04 and p = 0.001, respectively). Most (89.4%) participants agreed that Preanestes@s was intuitive and easy to use, with over 85% showing high levels of acceptance of PreQuest prototype's communication improvement and ease of use. The final version of Preanestes@s and PreQuest was evaluated by 218 participants, many of whom (>74%) affirmed its ease of use. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Preanestes@s for preoperative assessment is supported by high levels of satisfaction with the prototype and by an eQuest completion rate greater than 65% in a non-selective population. In our sample, younger age and higher education attainment predicted higher rates PreQuest completion. Trial registration number NCT04259268.


Subject(s)
Electronics , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Humans , Internet , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147408

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Due to its high transmissibility, measures aimed at reducing the spread of SARS CoV2 have become mandatory. Different organizations have recommended performing polymerase chain reaction tests (PCR) as part of the preoperative screening of surgical patients. We aimed to determine the performance of PCR testing to detect asymptomatic carriers. METHODS: Observational study carried out at a tertiary care center. We compared the results of preoperative real-time reverse-transcription-PCR test (RT-PCR) performed on a cohort of patients pending surgery with the results we would have expected assuming the epidemiological data released by government offices. RESULTS: We registered no positives in the 2,722 preoperative RT-PCR tests performed in our health care area between epidemiological Weeks 18 to 21, meaning a cumulative incidence trending to zero. Assuming public epidemiological data, the probabilistic projection of potential asymptomatic individuals ranged from 0.27 × 10e-4 (according to official data of new cases diagnosed by PCR) to 4.69 × 10e-4 if we assumed cases confirmed by IgG test in our province. Assuming a RT-PCR sensitivity of 95%, to obtain a positive result we should perform 38,461 and 2,028 tests respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In scenarios of very low prevalence and despite high sensitivity scores, indiscriminate preoperative RT-PCR screening is of a questionable effectiveness for detecting asymptomatic carriers. Our findings evidence the difficulty of establishing reliable predictive models for the episodic and rapidly evolving incidence of infections such as has characterized the SARS CoV2 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Carrier State/diagnosis , Pandemics , Preoperative Care , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/statistics & numerical data , Carrier State/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
4.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858679

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Due to its high transmissibility, measures aimed at reducing the spread of SARS CoV2 have become mandatory. Different organizations have recommended performing polymerase chain reaction tests (PCR) as part of the preoperative screening of surgical patients. We aimed to determine the performance of PCR testing to detect asymptomatic carriers. METHODS: Observational study carried out at a tertiary care center. We compared the results of preoperative real-time reverse-transcription-PCR test (RT-PCR) performed on a cohort of patients pending surgery with the results we would have expected assuming the epidemiological data released by government offices. RESULTS: We registered no positives in the 2,722 preoperative RT-PCR tests performed in our health care area between epidemiological Weeks 18 to 21, meaning a cumulative incidence trending to zero. Assuming public epidemiological data, the probabilistic projection of potential asymptomatic individuals ranged from 0.27*10e -4 (according to official data of new cases diagnosed by PCR) to 4.69*10e -4 if we assumed cases confirmed by IgG test in our province. Assuming a RT-PCR sensitivity of 95%, to obtain a positive result we should perform 38,461 and 2,028 tests respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In scenarios of very low prevalence and despite high sensitivity scores, indiscriminate preoperative RT-PCR screening is of a questionable effectiveness for detecting asymptomatic carriers. Our findings evidence the difficulty of establishing reliable predictive models for the episodic and rapidly evolving incidence of infections such as has characterized the SARS CoV2 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Preoperative Care , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Curr Pharm Des ; 10(31): 3931-46, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15579081

ABSTRACT

Since the concept of Pharmaceutical Care was introduced from United States about twenty years ago, this initiative has become a dominant form of practice for thousands of pharmacists around the world. Currently, pharmaceutical care is understood as the pharmacists' compromise to obtain the maximum benefit from the pharmacological treatments of the patients, being therefore responsible of monitoring their pharmacotherapy. As the profession has moved from a product orientation (dispensing medications) to a patient focus, clinical training requirements have expanded. This is a slow but ongoing process, which started from a philosophical point of view, in order to transform the concept of Pharmacy from commodity-based, mercantile operations into a clinical profession in the community pharmacies. Since its introduction, there has been an ample debate on the definition of pharmaceutical care due to differences in Pharmacy systems and in health care structure among the different countries. Moreover, several implementation barriers exist, which are attributable to problems in education, skills, resources and environment. Indeed, an awareness of the problem resulting from the use of medicines exists and numerous studies reflect that drug use control is necessary since there is an important relationship between morbidity / mortality and pharmacotherapy. Thus, it is possible to evaluate the benefits of pharmaceutical care on patients' health and ultimately on society. Many studies have been conducted, which show that the provision of pharmaceutical care has its value in common pathologies such as diabetes, hypertension, asthma, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain, rheumatic diseases or psychiatric disorders, as well as in polymedicated patients. A large amount of data is currently being published in biomedical journals, in an effort to establish the clinical, economic and humanistic viability of pharmaceutical care. Thus, the aim of this review is to study the evolution of this practice from its beginning until nowadays. Furthermore, we have analyzed a number of implementation programs performed in countries of Europe, the United States and Latin America, focusing on clinical, economical and humanistic outcomes, and also, on the current concept of drug therapy problems (DTP) considered as failures in drug therapy. We conclude that the positive outcomes obtained with different programs of pharmaceutical care are making a beneficial change in patients' health but still more research projects should be conducted to support this change.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Services/trends , Forecasting , Humans , Internationality , Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Societies, Pharmaceutical/ethics , Societies, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...