ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There are recommendations for decision-making as regards parents who do not vaccinate their children, but there are few publications analysing this problem. In November 2014, a pioneer medical clinic opened in Spain, for counselling on immunisation practices. The aim of this study is to determine the success of the recommendations of the American and Spanish Paediatrics Associations according to the number of parents who finally accept vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective and single-centre study was conducted from November 2014 to March 2016. Children under the age of 16 not properly vaccinated, according to the immunisation schedule of the region where the study was conducted, were included after signing informed consent. RESULTS: A total of 20 families were counselled. The median age of the children was 2 years, and 80% of them received no vaccine. Absolute non-acceptance of vaccination was practiced by 45% of parents. The main reasons for not vaccinating were: 100% thimerosal-containing, 90% risk of autism, 85% aluminium-containing, 70% presence of other stabilisers and preservatives, and 65% risk of anaphylaxis. The immunisation advice was said to be helpful by 90% of parents. Vaccination was accepted by 90% of parents (45% completely). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-vaccination ideologies are strong and hard to change. Paediatricians not denying medical care to parents who endanger the lives of their own children are also hard to find. The meeting point is possible, and society needs it. Active listening, empathy, and good quality information were the keys to our results.
Subject(s)
Directive Counseling/standards , Parents , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The larval form of the moth Thaumetopoea pityocampa, known as pine processionary caterpillar, is one of the main forest pests in southern Europe. Often, these caterpillars cause local reactions in humans, due to their microscopic stinging hairs. Most symptoms affect skin, in form of acute urticaria. Systemic reactions are rare. An eleven month old infant with a systemic reaction after ingestion of a pine processionary caterpillar is presented. The boy reached the Emergency Room with orofacial edema, drooling and urticaria. Drug treatment was enough to resolve the symptoms. The patient did not present airway commitment, nor anaphylaxis data at any moment, so more aggressive actions, such as endotracheal intubation, endoscopy or laryngoscopy, were rejected.
La oruga procesionaria del pino, forma larvaria de la mariposa nocturna Thaumetopoea pityocampa, es una de las principales plagas forestales del sur de Europa. Con frecuencia, estas orugas producen reacciones locales en humanos debidas a los pelillos urticantes microscópicos que las recubren. La mayoría de los síntomas ocasionados son cutáneos, como urticaria aguda, y son mucho más infrecuentes las reacciones sistémicas. Se presenta un caso de reacción sistémica, con edema orofacial, babeo y urticaria tras la ingesta de una oruga procesionaria del pino en un lactante de 11 meses, en el cual el tratamiento farmacológico fue suficiente para la resolución de los síntomas. No tuvo, en ningún momento, compromiso de la vía aérea ni otros datos de anafilaxia, por lo que se desestimaron actuaciones más agresivas, como intubación orotraqueal, endoscopía o laringoscopía.
