Use a biodegradable stent in ERCP, it will never be forgotten

The easiest way to drain the bile duct or the main pancreatic duct by means of ERCP is the insertion of a plastic stent. Once cannulation has been achieved, which is generally the most complex and limiting step in ERCP, stent insertion is straightforward and rewarding. The main problem in benign pancreato-biliary conditions comes in the follow-up. Indications for biliary stent insertion in non-neoplastic diseases are common bile duct (CBD) stones that could not be completely extracted, benign strictures and leaks. In the pancreas stents are frequently inserted to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis and for benign strictures and other less frequent conditions such as main pancreatic duct disruption. Currently in all centers more and more ERCPs are performed in patients without naive Papilla of Vater, generally for stent extraction or exchange. For example, in the recent study by Barakat and Banerjee, carried out in a tertiary care academic medical center, only 25% were index or initial ERCP, without previous sphincterotomy or stent, and subsequent procedures comprised the remaining 75 %. (AU)

Use a biodegradable stent in ERCP and it will never be forgotten.

The easiest way to drain the bile duct or the main pancreatic duct by means of ERCP is the insertion of a plastic stent. Once cannulation has been achieved, which is generally the most complex and limiting step in ERCP, stent insertion is straightforward and rewarding. The main problem in benign pancreato-biliary conditions comes in the follow-up. Indications for biliary stent insertion in non-neoplastic diseases are common bile duct (CBD) stones that could not be completely extracted, benign strictures and leaks. In the pancreas stents are frequently inserted to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis and for benign strictures and other less frequent conditions such as main pancreatic duct disruption. Currently in all centers more and more ERCPs are performed in patients without naive Papilla of Vater, generally for stent extraction or exchange. For example, in the recent study by Barakat and Banerjee, carried out in a tertiary care academic medical center, only 25% were index or initial ERCP, without previous sphincterotomy or stent, and subsequent procedures comprised the remaining 75 %.

Short and long-term outcomes of underwater EMR compared to the traditional procedure in the real clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) has been recently described as an alternative to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for flat colorectal polyps. However, the real applications remain unclear due to the lack of comparative studies. METHODS: a multi-centric prospective study was performed from November 2016 to December 2017. All lesions larger than 15 mm that were resected with both techniques were included in the study. The samples were matched using the size, morphology, site and access (SMSA) score as a reference. The efficacy, efficiency and adverse events rates were compared. RESULTS: a total of 162 resections were collected (112 EMR and 50 U-EMR) with an average size of 25 mm. U-EMR achieved better results for the en bloc resection rate (49 vs 62%; p = 0.08) and there were no cases of an incomplete resection (10.7 vs 0%; p = 0.01). U-EMR was faster than EMR and there were no differences in the adverse events rate. Furthermore, U-EMR tended to achieve better results in terms of recurrence. Performing the resection in emersion appeared to prevent the cautery artefact, especially in sessile serrated adenomas. CONCLUSION: in the real clinical practice, U-EMR and EMR are equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety. Furthermore, U-EMR may be a feasible approach to prevent cautery artefact, allowing an accurate pathologic assessment.

Electromagnetic assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is more efficient than water-jet assisted and conventional ESD in experimental model.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The adequate visualization of the dissection line, inside the submucosal layer, supposes the main challenging issue in ESD. For this reason, several counter traction methods have been developed focused on overcoming this handicap. One of which, Magnetic anchor guided - ESD (MG-ESD) is an attractive alternative. However, the usefulness of this approach has been scarcely assessed and compared with other ESD strategies. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare three different ESD alternatives in experimental faction. METHODS: This was a prospective non-randomized study, in which three different ESD techniques were performed in an ex-vivo gastric porcine model by an endoscopist slight expertise in ESD: conventional ESD, waterjet assisted ESD and MG-ESD. MG-ESD was performed using two different magnets: inner Neodymiun ringed shape magnet attached to the simulated lesions by an endoclip and external electromagnet connected to a Single Output Adjustable 24V/0.3A Power Supply Unit. RESULTS: Forty-six ESD procedures were performed: 24 conventional ESD, 12 waterjet-assisted ESD and 10 MG-ESD. Average size of the simulated lesions was 33.86 mm. No differences in terms of safety and efficacy were registered between the three approaches. Nevertheless, MG-ESD proved to be faster and more efficient than conventional ESD and water-jet assisted ESD (min per cm 2 10.85 vs. 7.43 vs. 3,41; P  = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MG-ESD could be a feasible alternative to conventional ESD even at the beginning of the learning curve. Therefore, researches focused on developing appropriate ESD magnetic devices and further comparative studies must be promoted, in order to assess the reliable usefulness of the magnet-assistance in ESD.

Underwater hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in a rectal polyp: a case report of a new application of "underwater endoscopy"

Background: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been described as an alternative to traditional ESD. This technique is less time consuming, but the en bloc resection rate is lower than in ESD. Similar to endoscopic mucosal resection, the underwater technique could improve preliminary disadvantages of hybrid ESD. Case report: We attempted a mixture resection technique of Hybrid ESD with underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Using this approach, an underwater hybrid ESD was successfully performed without adverse events on a 71 year old woman with a 20 mm adenoma. The histologic analysis identified a tubulovillious adenoma with high grade dysplasia and tumor free margins. Discussion: Underwater hybrid ESD could be an alternative to ESD. Moreover the modification of the "underwater method" provides a suitable way to overcome the technical drawbacks of the hybrid ESD

No disponible

Underwater hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in a rectal polyp: a case report of a new application of "underwater endoscopy".

BACKGROUND: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been described as an alternative to traditional ESD. This technique is less time consuming, but the en bloc resection rate is lower than in ESD. Similar to endoscopic mucosal resection, the underwater technique could improve preliminary disadvantages of hybrid ESD. CASE REPORT: We attempted a mixture resection technique of Hybrid ESD with underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Using this approach, an underwater hybrid ESD was successfully performed without adverse events on a 71 year old woman with a 20 mm adenoma. The histologic analysis identified a tubulovillious adenoma with high grade dysplasia and tumor free margins. DISCUSSION: Underwater hybrid ESD could be an alternative to ESD. Moreover the modification of the "underwater method" provides a suitable way to overcome the technical drawbacks of the hybrid ESD.

Multiband mucosectomy for the treatment of challenging non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection is the gold standard treatment for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps; however, some specific situations (location behind folds, scarred or flat morphology) can make this technique challenging. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of multiband mucosectomy (MBM) for resection of non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients in whom MBM was performed to resect large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. All procedures were carried out using the Shooter multiband ligator kit (Cook Medical, Limerick, Ireland). A 3-month follow-up colonoscopy was performed in all patients. RESULTS: 10 patients underwent MBM for resection of 10 large (median 33.5 mm) non-pedunculated polyps. A total of 45 MBM sessions were carried out to resect all of the lesions using on average one rubber band per 1.5 cm2 of resected tissue. Complete resection was possible in 9 out of 10 lesions, although en bloc resection was only feasible in one lesion. Follow-up colonoscopy revealed residual adenoma in just one patient. No major complications were registered. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series of patients, MBM proved to be a safe and effective endoscopic resection technique for challenging non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Actinomyces infection as a complication of a post-radiotherapy rectal ulcer.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic radiotherapy is associated with early and late local complication. Actinomyces bacterium is part of the saprophyte flora, although some infection underlying factors are known , the pathophysiology of the disease is still unexplained. Frequently it is involved in oral, gastrointestinal and respiratory infections. CASE REPORT: We present the description of a clinical case supported with images. So that we have developed a bibliographical research in Pubmed data base including the following key words: Ulcer, rectum, brachitherapy and Actinomyces. The most recent original articles published in the last teen years, related with the pathology observed in the patient of the case, were selected. DISCUSSION: Brachitherapy over pelvic beds ( prostate, cervix and uterus) could be associated with digestive complications specially in the rectum. Those complications might oscillate from mild inflammatory changes in the mucosa to serious damages as ulcers and lack of tissue. This situation increase the risk of opportunistic infections which could endanger the clinical improve of our patients. We suggest to remember those germen in the diagnosis process in other to achieve an early diagnosis and to use a targeted treatment.

Accuracy of liquid cytology in the diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagoscopy with biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing and monitoring eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Therefore is important to discover less-invasive diagnostic methods. METHODS: Cytology specimens were obtained in patients with active EoE (AEoE) (≥15 eos/hpf) and EoE in remission (EoER) (<15 eos/hpf). The samples were assessed by two independent pathologists and were compared with biopsy samples. EoE cytology specimens were compared with specimens obtained from patients with GERD. RESULTS: Specimens of 36 patients (69.4% male, mean age 30.88 years) were included. AEoE (17, 47.2%), EoER (11, 30.5%) and GERD (22.2%). eos/hpf in cytology (AEoE 9.23 vs. EoER 1.54 vs. GERD 2, p = 0.01). Linear correlation between eos/hpf average biopsy and cytology eos/hpf: r = 0.57, p < 0.001. For diagnosis of EoE ≥3 eos/hpf in cytology obtained a sensitivity of 70%, specificity 81%, PPV 86% and NPV 60% (AUC = 0.81, p = 0.01). For detection of AEoE, ≥3 eos/hpf in LBC obtained a sensitivity of 70%, specificity 82%, PPV 81% and NPV 66% (AUC = 0.87, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LBC in oesophageal aspirate seems to be effective for the diagnosis and monitoring activity in EoE. These results support the usefulness of non-invasive methods for the diagnosis and monitoring of EoE.

Effectiveness of serological markers of eosinophil activity in monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: it is necessary to find serological markers accessible in clinical practice to prevent the need to perform repeated endoscopies. OBJECTIVE: to assess the efficacy of eosinophil activity markers in monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: thirty patients were included prospectively, all under dietary treatment -diets excluding 6 foods, and allergy test based diet (skin prick test and specific IgE). The variables assessed were demographic parameters, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels (µg/mL), total IgE (KU/L), peripheral blood eosinophils (PBE) (U/mm³), and the maximum peak of eosinophils/hpf in esophageal biopsies. The variation found between these figures was assessed in line with response to dietary treatment. RESULTS: thirty patients (66.7% males; mean age 33.43 years) were included in the study, 22 responders and 8 non-responders. Ninety percent presented a personal history of atopy. No significant decrease was detected in serum total IgE and ECP after diet in responder and nonresponders. However, the PBE decreased significantly in responders but not in nonresponders, PBE in responders (pre-diet. 397.27 vs. post-diet 276.81, p = 0.024) and non-responders PBE (pre-diet. 460 vs. post-diet 317.5, p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: serum total IgE and ECP do not act as markers for EoE activity. However PBE may play a role in this regard, bearing in mind that this parameter may be influenced by concomitant atopic conditions.

A case of valproate-associated hepatotoxicity treated with L-carnitine.

Valproate is a major broad-spectrum anti-epileptic drug that is effective against many different types of epileptic seizures and that is usually well tolerated. Nevertheless, serious side effects can occur, including hepatotoxicity. This side effect is rare but often fatal, and it has been hypothesized that long-term valproate therapy may induce a carnitine deficiency and cause non-specific symptoms of hepatotoxicity and hyperammonemia. These factors suggest that L-carnitine supplementation may play a role in preventing hepatotoxicity. We report a case of valproate-induced acute liver injury with a favorable evolution after L-carnitine therapy.