Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 154(9): 338-343, 2020 05 08.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31780215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Faced with the suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), the guidelines recommend the use of clinical probability scales, measurement of D-dimer and, in certain cases, confirmation by pulmonary angiography by computed tomography (CTPA) or scintigraphy. Recently, it has been proposed to adjust the D-dimer according to age or use simpler scales (YEARS algorithm) for a better selection of patients. OBJECTIVE: To define the degree of application of the guidelines in our population and compare sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the different diagnostic models: Standard model (Wells 2 categories+D-dimer), Model adjusted for age (Wells 2 categories+D-dimer adjusted for age), YEARS algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent APTC at our centre for the diagnosis of PE over one year. RESULTS: Of 618 cases (85.4% of initial APTC), 544 patients were included. A total of 113 EPs were diagnosed (20.8%). The degree of application of the standard model was very high (90.1%) and proved to have the best sensitivity and negative predictive value ratio (sensitivity=1.0, negative predictive value=1.0). The new models could reduce the number of scans (17, 3.2% model adjusted for age and 48, 8.8% model YEARS) with a risk of false negatives (2 PE [1.8%] undiagnosed respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current diagnostic models for PE lead to a large number of unnecessary explorations. The new models could reduce the number of APTC although with a minimum risk of false negatives.


Subject(s)
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Pulmonary Embolism , Angiography , Humans , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Probability , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies
2.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 31(6): 282-288, 2019.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005341

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: After an ischemic cerebrovascular event the risk of new ischemic events is high, therefore antithrombotic therapy are indicated to prevent stroke recurrence. DISCUSSION: Despite its clear benefit, these therapies increase the risk of bleeding. Therefore, it is essential to identify high hemorrhagic risk patients. There are different predictive models of hemorrhage, in particular of intracranial hemorrhage, associated with the use of antiaggregants in patients who have presented an ischemic stroke or TIA, such as the CCSC, intracranial scales -B2LEED3S score or S2TOP-BLEED. However, though main international guidelines recommend the use of scales, in particular, the HAS-BLED score, to assess the risk of bleeding in anticoagulated patients, there is no specific recommendation in the case of the use of antiplatelet drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In this review we present the main models currently available for the prediction of bleeding of antithrombotic therapy in patients who have had a stroke or TIA.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Ischemic Attack, Transient/prevention & control , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Stroke/prevention & control , Age Factors , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Body Mass Index , Cerebral Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Ethnicity , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Recurrence , Risk Assessment/methods , Secondary Prevention , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...