ABSTRACT
AIM: This study aims to assess the influence of training on nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic alarm state in Spain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Data collection was carried out by means of an ad hoc questionnaire using Google Forms in April and May 2020. The score of attitudes toward end-of-life care was used, to which sociodemographic variables and training in palliative care were added. METHODS: Data were collected from 238 nursing professionals who had cared for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients at the end-of-life stage in a hospital or nursing home. RESULTS: Results showed that 51% of the nurses in the sample had training in palliative care. However, the percentage decreased to 38.5% among those who cared for COVID-19 patients and to 44.5% in those who cared for non-COVID-19 patients. In relation to attitudes about end-of-life care, more positive attitudes and a higher mean score were found in the trained group. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care training is a key element in end-of-life care and is even more important in times of COVID-19. IMPACT: Although end-of-life accompaniment has been studied, few studies have included the influence of training on this during the pandemic. This study identifies key elements of accompaniment and training in a comparison of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. In relation to attitudes toward end-of-life care, the results showed a more positive attitude and a higher mean score in the trained group (3.43 ± 0.37 versus 3.21 ± 0.32), the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nurses , Terminal Care , Attitude , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Palliative Care , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the quality of life and caregiver burden of family caregivers of cancer patients at the beginning of palliative care. METHOD: Cross-sectional descriptive study in the CUIDPACOSTASOL cohort of family caregivers of palliative phase cancer patients, included between February 2017 and December 2019 from health centres of the Costa del Sol and Malaga-Valle del Guadalhorce Primary Care District, and Cudeca Foundation. Sociodemographic data on caregivers and patients, specific questionnaires related to family caregiver burden as well as satisfaction (Zarit and FAMCARE), quality of life (SF-36) and nursing diagnoses (NANDA), and patient characteristics (PPI, PPSv2) were collected. RESULTS: 174 family caregivers were included, 86.8% were women with a mean age of 57 years. 60.6% perceived their health as good, and the mean score on the Zarit scale was 13.0. The most repeated nursing diagnosis (NANDA) was «Risk for caregiver role strain¼ (41.8%). The quality-of-life dimensions with the highest scores were «Physical function¼ (80.5), and «Physical role¼ (67.2). Of the people receiving care, 62.6% were men with a mean age of 73 years and required care for an average of 19 h per day. The mean score on the Palliative Performance Scale, PPSv2, was 44.9%, and 3.9% on the PPI Palliative Prognostic Index. CONCLUSIONS: Family caregivers in this study had moderate burden, high risk for caregiver role strain, and acceptable perceived health and quality of life. This is probably because they were at the beginning of palliative care.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Neoplasms , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the quality of life and caregiver burden of family caregivers of cancer patients at the beginning of palliative care. METHOD: Cross-sectional descriptive study in the CUIDPACOSTASOL cohort of family caregivers of palliative phase cancer patients, included between February 2017 and December 2019 from health centres of the Costa del Sol and Malaga-Valle del Guadalhorce Primary Care District, and Cudeca Foundation. Sociodemographic data on caregivers and patients, specific questionnaires related to family caregiver burden as well as satisfaction (Zarit and FAMCARE), quality of life (SF-36) and nursing diagnoses (NANDA), and patient characteristics (PPI, PPSv2) were collected. RESULTS: 174 family caregivers were included, 86.8% were women with a mean age of 57 years. 60.6% perceived their health as good, and the mean score on the Zarit scale was 13.0. The most repeated nursing diagnosis (NANDA) was «Risk for caregiver role strain¼ (41.8%). The quality-of-life dimensions with the highest scores were «Physical function¼ (80.5), and «Physical role¼ (67.2). Of the people receiving care, 62.6% were men with a mean age of 73 years and required care for an average of 19 hours per day. The mean score on the Palliative Performance Scale, PPSv2, was 44.9%, and 3.9% on the PPI Palliative Prognostic Index. CONCLUSIONS: Family caregivers in this study had moderate burden, high risk for caregiver role strain, and acceptable perceived health and quality of life. This is probably because they were at the beginning of palliative care.
