Real world data analysis of next generation sequencing and protein expression in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Next generation sequencing (NGS) together with protein expression analysis is back bone of molecularly targeted therapy in precision medicine. Our retrospective study shows our experience with NGS of 324 genes in combination with protein expression in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC). The primary purpose was to analyze the prevalence of individual genetic alterations combined with protein expression to define potential targets for an individualized therapy. Between April 2018 and September 2019, 41 patients with aBC were offered a NGS test. The test was used to detect clinically relevant genomic alterations and to support further targeted therapy decisions. Hormone receptors, ERBB2 of tumors and PD-L1 was stained by immunohistochemistry. The data was recorded up to September 2019. After prior consent 41 results were available for further analysis. The most common BC subtypes were triple-negative (n = 16), HR+/ERBB2- (n = 15), and ERBB2+ (n = 9), with one missing data of the primary tumor. 27 patients had more than one genetic alteration. The most common alterations were PIK3CA (n = 14) and ERBB2 alterations (n = 11). Followed by ESR1 (n = 10), FGFR1 (n = 7) and PTEN (n = 7). 68% of the alterations were clinically relevant (tier I and II of ESCAT classification). The most common treatment recommendation was ERBB2-directed therapy (single or double blockade, trastuzumab emtansine and lapatinib) followed by alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant. Comprehensive genomic profiling combined with protein expression analysis in aBC allowed a guided personalized therapy for half of our patients. So far there are no well-defined tools allowing interpretations of genomic alterations detected by NGS in combination with protein expression and other factors.

Are Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Ready for Clinical Use in Breast Cancer? An Overview of Completed and Ongoing Trials Using CTCs for Clinical Treatment Decisions.

In recent years, breast cancer treatment has become increasingly individualized. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have the potential to move personalized medicine another step forward. The prognostic relevance of CTCs has already been proven both in early and metastatic breast cancer. In addition, there is evidence that changes in CTC numbers during the course of therapy can predict treatment response. Thus, CTCs are a suitable tool for repeated treatment monitoring through noninvasive liquid biopsy. The next step is to evaluate how this information can be used for clinical decision making with regard to the extension, modification, or abandonment of a treatment regimen. This review will summarize the completed and ongoing clinical trials using CTC number or phenotype for treatment decisions. Based on current knowledge, CTCs can be regarded as a useful prognostic and predictive marker that is well suited for both risk stratification and treatment monitoring in breast cancer patients. However, there is still the need to provide sufficient and unequivocal evidence for whether CTCs may indeed be used to guide treatment decisions in everyday clinical practice. The results of the ongoing trials described in this review are eagerly awaited to answer these important questions.

Differential prognostic relevance of patho-anatomical factors among different tumor-biological subsets of breast cancer: Results from the adjuvant SUCCESS A study.

OBJECTIVES: In breast cancer, large tumor size, positive nodal stage and a triple-negative tumor subtype are associated with reduced survival, but the interactions between these prognostic factors are not well understood. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Here we re-evaluated the impact of tumor size, nodal stage and tumor subtype on disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in a retrospective analysis using data from the adjuvant SUCCESS A trial. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess whether the effect of tumor size and nodal stage on survival depended on tumor subtype. RESULTS: Increasing tumor size, higher nodal stage and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were associated with unfavorable prognosis (all p < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between tumor subtype and tumor size (p > 0.5 for all four survival endpoints), but we found significant interactions between tumor subtype and nodal stage (p < 0.05 for all four survival endpoints), with no differences in survival among tumor subtypes for patients with pN0 tumors (all p > 0.05) and pronounced differences in survival among tumor subtypes for patients with positive nodal stage (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms tumor size, nodal stage and tumor subtype as independent prognostic factors in high-risk early breast cancer. Nodal-positive patients with TNBC had a considerably worse outcome compared to nodal-positive patients with another tumor subtype. This underlines the importance for early detection particularly for patients with TNBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2005-000490-21; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02181101.

Review on current treatment options for lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) of the breast: do B3 papillary lesions need to be removed in any case by open surgery?

BACKGROUND: In breast tissue, pre-malignant lesions are classified as BIRADS 3. The treatment of this heterogeneous group varies with expertise and tools available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the example of two case reports, the literature is reviewed on current treatment options for BIRADS 3 breast lesions. RESULTS: About 7% of all B-type breast biopsies fall into the B3 category. Approximately 35% of these B3 lesions are due to FEA, 20% to PLs and another 20% to ADH. Due to improvement in diagnostics, the incidence is increasing, while their value as a predictive factor for malignancy has steadily been fallen. CONCLUSION: Depending on the histology of the needle biopsy, a complete resection with vacuum-assisted biopsy may be a treatment alternative to open biopsy.

Prevalence of circulating tumor cells in early breast cancer patients 2 and 5 years after adjuvant treatment.

PURPOSE: Several studies have provided evidence on the prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) detected before and after chemotherapy regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in early breast cancer (EBC). We provide data on the prevalence of CTCs 2 and 5 years after primary diagnosis in a cohort of patients with EBC. METHODS: The SUCCESS study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial comparing PFS in primary breast cancer patients undergoing one of two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens followed by 2 versus 5 years of treatment with zoledronate. CTCs from patients without signs of breast cancer recurrence were analyzed in peripheral blood using the FDA cleared CellSearch® System (Veridex, USA) 2 and 5 years after primary diagnosis. RESULTS: CTCs were detected at 2 and 5 years after primary diagnosis in 96 (16.7%) and 47 (8.2%) of the 574 patients, respectively. There were no associations between CTC status and patient and tumor characteristics or treatment regimens. In 442 (77.0%) patients, no CTCs were detected at either of the two time points, and in 11 patients (1.9%), CTCs were found at both 2 and 5 years after primary diagnosis. In 85 (14.8%) patients, CTCs were present 2 years after primary diagnosis but not after 5 years, while 36 (6.3%) patients had CTCs in their blood only at the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EBC, CTCs can be detected even 5 years after primary diagnosis without clinical signs of disease recurrence.