[Nutritional and Functional assessment of peritoneal dialysis patients in the clinical practice: Report from MITO-DP Group]. / Valutazione Nutrizionale e Funzionale dei pazienti in dialisi peritoneale nella pratica clinica: l'esperienza del Gruppo Medico-Infermieristico Toscano di Dialisi Peritoneale (M.I.TO.-DP).

Nutritional abnormalities and physical inactivity are risk factors of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with ESRD. Identify and define malnutrition, in particular protein-energy depletion (PEW), is an important task in the management of renal patients. The aim of this multicenter observational study was to implement the assessment of nutritional status and functional capacity in patients on peritoneal dialysis, including tests and validated methods which are relatively easy to apply in daily clinical practice. The study includes all the 133 prevalent patients (80 m, 53 f, age 65 14 years), in peritoneal dialysis treatment (vintage 26 19 months) in 9 centers in Tuscany. We performed anthropometry, bioimpedance (BIA), clinical biochemistry, evaluation of habitual physical activity (RAPA tests) and performance (Sit-To-Stand test), appetite-evaluation questionnaire, and indices including the Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI), Charlson comorbidity index, Barthel and Karnowsky index. The latter showed a condition of dependence in 7.2% and 19.7% of cases, respectively. Poor appetite was recorded in 48.2%. The majority of patients fell within the overweight / obesity range (51%) with waist circumference values associated with increased cardiovascular risk in 51% of males and 60% of females. At the BIA analysis, a BCMI <8 kg/m2 was detected in 39% of patients; an estimated protein intake <1.0 g / kg/d was found in 59% of cases; 34% of patients had serum albumin <3.5 g / dl; control of acidosis was good (bicarbonate 25.4 3.8 mM) but hyperphosphatemia was present in 64.6% of patients. A condition of sedentary or light physical activity was reported by 65.1% of patients, vigorous activity only by 11.9%. The 86.5% of patients able to perform the Sit-to-stand test reported a lower than the reference values for age and sex. A diagnosis of PEW was possible in 8% of our series, while a MIS score> 11, indicative of PEW, took place in 12.7% of cases. The values of the MIS correlated directly with age and the degree of comorbidity and inversely with the sit-to-stand test, RAPA tests and appetite level. The data in this study show that single tests indicative of malnutrition disorders are frequent to be found in our series of peritoneal dialysis patients. However, a diagnosis of PEW is quite infrequent. A large percentage of patients are overweight with increased abdominal adiposity, and reduced cell mass and protein intake below recommended levels; the level of habitual physical activity is low, and the level of physical capability is scarce. Therefore it is conceivable a nutritional counseling intervention to increase the intake of proteins, limiting the phosphorus and (when indicated) energy intake and to stimulating spontaneous physical activity or arranging assisted programs for functional rehabilitation. Close monitoring of the nutritional status and implementation of programs of adapted physical activity should have a prominent role in the clinical management of patients on peritoneal dialysis.

[Dialysis and quality of life: identifying and managing critical aspects]. / Terapia dialitica e qualitá di vita: individuare le aree di criticitá per orientare alla metodica più idonea.

Living with a chronic disease is for the patient a ''disease experience'' that also affects the psychosocial sphere and has a negative impact on perceived quality of life. To estimate the effect of dialysis on the perceived quality of life and to identify by means of a specific questionnaire the aspects that are compromised most. From our results it emerged that the examined patients had a sufficiently good total perception of quality of life, even though about 30% of the patients reported critical aspects related to daily life and, in some age groups, also related to dialysis method. This study confirms the importance of developing educational and supportive predialysis programs in order to identify and reduce the critical aspects.

Gastric pH, sevelamer hydrochloride and omeprazole.

AIMS: Sevelamer hydrochloride is a polymer containing multiple amines (40% amine hydrochloride) separated by one carbon from the polymer backbone, and it is not absorbed by the intestine. These amines are partially protonated and interact with phosphate molecules through ionic and hydrogen bonding, therefore reducing phosphate absorption and lowering serum phosphate concentration. Alterations of gastric pH, in particular excessive alkalinization, could interfere with sevelamer phosphate binding capacity. CASE HISTORY: A 30-year-old dialysis patient affected by secondary hyperparathyroidism started sevelamer treatment, 4.8 g/day, with a basal serum phosphate of 6.9 mg/dl. The patient was also treated with omeprazole (20 mg/day) because of chronic gastritis. Phosphate levels normalized (4.2 mg/dl), but after four months of follow-up serum phosphate unexpectedly increased to 7.2 mg/dl. We found out that in the same period she had autonomously increased the dosage of omeprazole to 80 mg/day, due to worsening of dyspepsia. Gastric pH measurement showed a median level of 4.1, rather than the normal values of 1 - 2, indicating excessive pharmacological alkalinization. When omeprazole was reduced to the correct dose of 20 mg/day, we observed a rapid decrease of phosphate levels. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the influence of gastric pH on sevelamer phosphate binding capacity. The high dose of omeprazole and the consequent excessive increase in gastric pH was probably responsible for a decreased phosphate binding capacity of sevelamer. When patients taking appropriate doses of sevelamer do not respond to treatment, a potential interaction with drugs determining an increase of gastric pH should be considered.

Serotoninergic receptor activation by dextrofenfluramine enhances the blunted pituitary-adrenal responsiveness to corticotropin-releasing hormone in obese subjects.

To explore the interrelationships between the serotoninergic system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in human obesity, we evaluated cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) response to synthetic human corticotropin-releasing hormone (hCRH, 1 microgram/kg intravenously [IV]) before and after stimulation of the serotoninergic system by dextrofenfluramine (d-FF, 30 mg/d for 3 months) in nine obese women. These responses were compared with a CRH test (1 microgram/kg) carried out in nine age-matched normal-weight women. Plasma cortisol of obese subjects did not significantly increase after CRH (peak value 127.1 +/- 11.2 ng/mL v 104.1 +/- 9.5 ng/mL). This response was lower (P less than .005) than in the controls, in whom the basal cortisol value of 120.6 +/- 11.8 ng/mL reached a peak value of 221.2 +/- 13.4 ng/mL. However, after administration of d-FF, CRH significantly increased (P less than .0001) plasma cortisol (peak value 170.6 +/- 18.0 ng/mL v 111.5 +/- 10.8 ng/mL) and the response was enhanced (P less than .05) as compared with that obtained before d-FF. The ACTH levels of our patients showed a small increment after CRH injection (peak value 13.5 +/- 1.7 pg/mL v 9.6 +/- 1.1 pg/mL), but the hormonal response was lower (P less than .005) than in controls (peak value 38.1 +/- 5.5 pg/mL v 13.8 +/- 0.8 pg/mL). However, after d-FF, CRH induced a significant increment (P less than .05) in plasma ACTH at 30 minutes (20.4 +/- 3.7 pg/mL v 10.9 +/- 0.9 pg/mL) and 45 minutes (18.0 +/- 2.6 pg/mL), even though this response was not significantly different from that observed before d-FF administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Naloxone does not modify fenfluramine-induced prolactin increase in obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the supposed physiological interaction between serotoninergic and opioidergic pathways in the modulation of PRL release is preserved in human obesity, a pathological condition in which these two systems are greatly impaired. DESIGN: According to a single-blind randomized procedure, three tests were performed: test A (oral placebo + saline infusion over 5 hours), test B (fenfluramine, a well known serotoninergic drug, 60 mg orally + saline infusion over 5 hours) and test C (fenfluramine at the same dose + naloxone, an opiate receptor antagonist, infusion over 5 hours at a dose of 3 mg/h). PATIENTS: Ten obese women (body mass index 34.4 +/- 2.3 kg/m2, mean +/- SE) and ten normal-weight sex and age-matched subjects (body mass index 22.3 +/- 2.4 kg/m2) volunteered for the study. MEASUREMENTS: At each test, blood samples for PRL determination were collected in basal conditions (time 0) and every hour for 5 hours. Plasma PRL was determined by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: In controls, naloxone significantly reduced the clear-cut PRL increase induced by fenfluramine. In obese patients, serotoninergic stimulation caused an increment in PRL levels similar to that in the controls, but opioid receptor blockade by naloxone did not affect this response. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that there is a physiological relationship between the serotoninergic and the opioidergic systems in the control of PRL secretion and show that this interaction is not present in obese subjects. Our data provide indirect proof of the functional impairment of these two systems in human obesity.

Blunted growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone in obese patients: influence of prolonged administration of the serotoninergic drug fenfluramine.

The aim of the present study was to ascertain if reduced central serotoninergic activity might contribute to the well-known blunted growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in obese patients. Thus, we studied the effect of prolonged stimulation of the serotoninergic system by fenfluramine (FF; 60 mg twice daily for 7 days) on GHRH-induced GH release in nine obese and seven normal subjects. In controls, GHRH (100 micrograms intravenously [IV]) injection increased GH levels from 2.3 +/- 1.8 (+/- SE) to 18.5 +/- 2.8 mU/L, P less than .002. FF administration enhanced both basal and GHRH-stimulated GH levels (peak, 38.4 +/- 8.3 v 6.9 +/- 2.6 mU/L, P less than .002). This response was significantly higher (P less than .02) than in pretreatment. In obese patients, GH responsiveness to GHRH was slight (peak, 7.1 +/- 2.0 v 0.6 +/- 0.18 mU/L, P less than .01) and lower (P less than .01) than in controls. FF administration did not affect this response. In controls, the enhanced FF-induced GH release after a maximal dose of GHRH indicates that serotoninergic activation influences GH secretion and that the mechanism involved is independent of endogenous GHRH. In obese patients, we found a blunted GH responsiveness to GHRH that was not affected by FF, thus supporting the hypothesis that the serotoninergic control on GH release is impaired.

Impaired growth hormone response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in obese patients: restoration blocked by ritanserin after fenfluramine administration.

The aim of the present study was to test whether the serotoninergic system may be involved in the well known reduced growth hormone (GH) response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (IIH) in obese patients. Ten obese women and 10 normal-weight control women underwent three IIH tests, at 14-day intervals: the first in basal conditions, the other two after randomized administration of a serotoninergic drug, fenfluramine (FF, 120 mg/day for 7 days) and FF plus ritanserin (RIT, 30 mg/day for the first 2 days and 20 mg/day on the following days). Ritanserin is a new selective 5-HT2 blocker receptor agent. Both controls and obese patients showed similar normal basal GH levels before each test and insulin administration always effectively reduced glucose levels to values lower than 2.2 mmol/l. In the controls, the expected GH increase to IIH (peak value 56 +/- 13.4 mU/l, AUC 234.4 +/- 55 mU/min/ml) was unaffected by FF administration (peak value 43 +/- 11.4; AUC 216.8 +/- 34.8). In response to the first IIH, the obese patients showed a significantly lower GH increase than in the case of the controls (peak value 21.4 +/- 4.6 mU/l, P less than 0.02; AUC 93.2 +/- 18.6, P less than 0.02). However, in comparison with the basal test, FF administration significantly (P less than 0.001) enhanced GH response to insulin hypoglycaemia (peak value 33.4 +/- 4; AUC 150 +/- 14.6), reaching values not significantly different from those of the controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of fenfluramine on prolactin and thyroid-stimulating-hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing-hormone in obese and normal women.

In order to demonstrate the suggested failure of the serotoninergic system in human obesity and to evaluate the role of central serotoninergic activity in prolactin (PRL) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) release in this condition, 13 euthyroid obese and 9 healthy women of normal weight were studied. A TRH test (200 micrograms i.v.) was performed before and after administration of fenfluramine (FF) 60 mg b.d. for 14 days. In the controls, FF did not modify the expected significant increase in PRL induced by TRH. In obese patients, however, the PRL levels was significantly increased after TRH, but the increase was less than in the controls. After FF, the PRL response to TRH was larger than in the pretreatment phase, with values similar to those observed in normal subjects. In neither group FF did change the TSH-stimulating effect of TRH, but the hormonal response in obese patients was greater than in the controls. The restoration of the responsiveness of PRL to TRH after central serotoninergic stimulation confirms the hypothesis that a failure of the serotoninergic system may occur in human obesity. Since FF does not interfere with the secretory pattern of basal and stimulated TSH in normal or obese subjects, the serotoninergic system does not seem to play a major role in the control of TSH secretion.

Naloxone does not antagonize the antihypertensive effect of chronic captopril therapy in hypertensive patients.

It has been reported that naloxone, an opiate receptor antagonist, blunts the hypotensive effect of captopril in normotensives. However, our previous data did not show any interaction between captopril given acutely and naloxone (0.1 mg/kg) in hypertensives. To test whether a greater naloxone dose could interfere with the hemodynamic effect of chronically administered captopril, 12 male hypertensives were studied: Six of them had been under captopril treatment (50 mg tid) for at least 1 month, whereas the others had been drug free for the same time. Both groups randomly received a saline or naloxone (0.2 mg/kg) infusion for 1 hour, and blood pressure, heart rate, PRA, plasma aldosterone, adrenaline, and noradrenaline were measured at regular intervals before, during, and after naloxone infusion. In drug-free hypertensives, naloxone tended to reduce blood pressure slightly and did not modify heart rate, PRA, plasma aldosterone, adrenaline, or noradrenaline. In captopril-treated hypertensives, naloxone did not blunt the hypotensive effect of captopril, but rather enhanced it, without changing the heart rate, adrenaline, and noradrenaline. Moreover, naloxone increased the renin-stimulating action and did not modify the aldosterone-inhibiting effect of captopril. Our results show that the hemodynamic action of captopril given chronically is not influenced by opioid receptor blockade and therefore that the antihypertensive effect of this drug seems to be unrelated to the activation of the opioidergic system.

Effects of fenfluramine and ritanserin on prolactin response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in obese patients: evidence for failure of the serotoninergic system.

In order to study the hypothesized impairment of the serotoninergic system in human obesity, an insulin tolerance test (ITT) was carried out on 12 obese normoprolactinemic women and on 6 normal-weight women before (A) and after (B) the administration of a serotoninergic drug, fenfluramine (60 mg twice a day per os for 7 days). After a washout period, a new ITT (C) followed the administration of fenfluramine at the same dose, associated with a specific S2 blocker receptor agent, ritanserin (30 mg/day for the first 2 days and 20 mg/day for a further 5 days). In obese subjects, the prolactin (PRL) response to ITT A was reduced as compared to the controls: in 6 patients ('nonresponders') the PRL levels did not change, while in the other 6 ('responders') they increased (p less than 0.003) but less than in the controls (p less than 0.02). In normal-weight subjects, the administration of fenfluramine alone or with ritanserin did not modify the PRL response to ITT. In the responders, the serotoninergic drug normalized the PRL response to ITT while significantly improving it in the nonresponders; these effects were not antagonized by ritanserin. In conclusion, our data suggest that the serotoninergic system of obese patients is impaired and that the different secretory pattern observed in the two groups before and after fenfluramine may reflect differing degrees of this impairment.

Prolactin unresponsiveness to repeated sulpiride administration in man: recent findings.

The mechanism of prolactin (PRL) unresponsiveness to repeated sulpiride (SUL) administration was investigated by means of two experimental protocols. The first one was carried on in seven male volunteers (age 24 to 34 yr) and consisted of two phases separated by a 5-day interval. In both phases 1 mg/kg of SUL was given im and repeated, 24 h later, together with either placebo (PL, 2 ml saline iv) or TRH (200 micrograms iv). 7-10 days later a standard TRH test (200 micrograms iv) was performed. In the second protocol the usual dose (1 mg/Kg im) of SUL was administered alone and, 24 h later, together with 0.1 U/Kg iv of insulin (insulin tolerance test: ITT) to six male volunteers (age 20 to 32 yr). A control standard ITT (0.1 U/Kg iv) was also performed 7-10 days later. Plasma samples for the evaluation of PRL were taken in basal conditions and at regular intervals after each drug administration. In the first protocol, PRL showed a significant increase (peak values at 30 min) after SUL administration in both phases (phase A: 54.8 +/- 5.6 ng/ml, mean +/- SE vs 6.4 +/- 0.3, p less than 0.001. Phase B: 77.5 +/- 3.9 vs 7.0 +/- 0.6, p less than 0.001). Twenty-four h later, PRL levels were still higher than basal and were not affected by the administration of SUL + PL or SUL + TRH. Also in the second protocol, SUL alone induced a significant PRL increase (peak values at 30 min: 47.1 +/- 7.2 vs 4.2 +/- 0.5, p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)