Feasibility of Intraoperative Proctosigmoidoscopy after Discoid Bowel Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Pilot Multicenter Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although surgery is the gold standard treatment for pain refractory to medical management or partial occlusion owing to rectosigmoid endometriosis, surgical resection can be associated with major perioperative complications. From general surgery experience, intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe, and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis after segmental resection. Unfortunately, there are no studies evaluating its role after discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. DESIGN: A pilot, multicentric, observational, prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Two academic hospitals, from March 1 to December 31, 2022. PATIENTS: We enrolled all consecutive fertile-age patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 18 and 50 years, (2) diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis performed by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and (3) women scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection of endometriosis at low risk of segmental resection. INTERVENTIONS: During data analysis, enrolled patients were divided into 2 study groups for comparisons based on whether or not the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy was performed upon surgeons' discretion after discoid resection for treating endometriosis, in addition to standard integrity tests. Primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success. Secondary study outcomes were the differences between the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group and the nonintraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group in (1) mean of total operative time and (2) rate of perioperative complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were enrolled and equally distributed in the 2 groups. The rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success was 86%. No significant difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of total operative time (p = .1) and intraoperative and postoperative complications (p = .5 and p = 1, respectively), with no surgical complication related to intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy seems as a feasible and non-time-consuming intraoperative procedure in women undergone discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Larger studies with longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and assess clinical benefits over standard procedure.

Laparoscopic appendectomy: Which factors are predictors of conversion? A high-volume prospective cohort study.

Appendicitis represents one of the most frequent condition requiring surgery. In Italy almost 0.2% of the population will be affected by acute appendicitis every year. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained acceptance over the past years and despite several meta-analyses, randomized studies and retrospective studies have been conducted, the indications and results are still conflicting especially in cases of complicated appendicitis. The aim of our study is to evaluate which factors are related to conversion to open appendectomy (OA) during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). MATHERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2011 to May 2013, appendectomy for acute appendicitis was performed on 434 patients in our Surgical Unit at S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. Of these, 369 patients (85%) underwent LA. The clinical, demographic, surgical and pathological data of these patients were included in a prospective database. To note, only laparoscopic appendectomies were considered to be included in the analysis. The following factors were analyzed in order to identify which were associated with the conversion: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgery, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory parameters including Alvarado score, PCR, intraoperative findings such as anatomy and degree of inflammation. During our study period, laparoscopic appendectomies were performed by different surgeons both residents and attending surgeons. The decision to convert the intervention in an open procedure was taken by the individual surgeon. Regarding the postoperative period, were considered the time of hospitalization and related costs, time of oral intake of liquid and solid, time of passage of stool, readmissions and reoperations. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, the factors significantly related to the conversion were the presence of comorbidities (p < 0.001) and, among these, the presence of arterial hypertension (p = 0.006) or other cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.031) and the history of previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.023). Patients with higher mean age (33.9 ± 15.4 vs. 46.0 ± 19.3, p = 0.001) and higher body mass index (BMI) (23.5 ± 4.3 vs 25.8 ± 4.9 kg/m(2), p = 0.006) had a higher risk of conversion. Multivariate analysis finally showed that factors significantly related to the conversion were the presence of comorbidities (p = 0.029), the presence of an appendiceal perforation (p = 0.003), a retrocecal appendix (p = 0.004), the presence of appendicular abscess (p = 0.023) and the presence of diffuse peritonitis (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with acute appendicitis can be successfully managed with laparoscopy. We found that the only preoperative independent factor related to conversion during laparoscopic appendectomy is the presence of comorbidities. Nevertheless surgeons should take into account that presence of peri-appendicular abscess and diffuse peritonitis are both independently related not only to higher rate of conversion but also to higher risk of postoperative complication.

Microarray-based identification and RT-PCR test screening for epithelial-specific mRNAs in peripheral blood of patients with colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of screening for colorectal cancer using a simple blood-based assay for the detection of tumor cells disseminated in the circulation at an early stage of the disease is gaining positive feedback from several lines of research. This method seems able to reduce colorectal cancer mortality and may replace colonoscopy as the most effective means of detecting colonic lesions. METHODS: In this work, we present a new microarray-based high-throughput screening method to identifying candidate marker mRNAs for the early detection of epithelial cells diluted in peripheral blood cells. This method includes 1. direct comparison of different samples of colonic mucosa and of blood cells to identify consistent epithelial-specific mRNAs from among 20,000 cDNA assayed by microarray slides; 2. identification of candidate marker mRNAs by data analysis, which allowed selection of only 10 putative differentially expressed genes; 3. Selection of some of the most suitable mRNAs (TMEM69, RANBP3 and PRSS22) that were assayed in blood samples from normal subjects and patients with colon cancer as possible markers for the presence of epithelial cells in the blood, using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Our present results seem to provide an indication, for the first time obtained by genome-scale screening, that a suitable and consistent colon epithelium mRNA marker may be difficult to identify. CONCLUSION: The design of new approaches to identify such markers is warranted.

Search for epithelial-specific mRNAs in peripheral blood of patients with colon cancer by RT-PCR.

Research has widely supported the efficacy of screening for colorectal cancer in reducing mortality. A blood-based assay potentially represents a more accessible early detection tool for the identification of solid tumor cells originating from a primary tumor site in the body. We demonstrate a relatively easy and highly reproducible technique for the detection of mRNA expression of genes as markers of malignancy in blood samples of patients with colon cancer. The present study aims to identify a set of specific mRNAs expressed in epithelial cells but not in blood cells, which may be useful as markers for early detection of circulating colon cancer cells by a simple, qualitative RT-PCR assay following semi-automated RNA extraction from peripheral blood samples. Our approach includes a systematic search for candidate markers using digital differential display, search on UniGene colon EST libraries and analysis of published data on colon cancer gene expression. A final list included the following genes: bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), cyclin D (CycD), family with sequence similarity 3, member D (FAM3D), gastrin (GAS), glycoprotein A33 transmembrane (GPA33), glutathione peroxidase 2 gastrointestinal (GPX2), galactoside-binding, soluble, 4 (galectin 4) (LGALS4), non-SMC, structural maintenance of chromosomes, element 1 protein (NSE1), tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 1 (TACSTD1), telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), trefoil factor 3 intestinal (TFF3), transmembrane 4 superfamily member 3 (TM4SF3), UDP glycosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A9 (UGT1A9), villin 1 (VIL1), and the novel gene FLJ20127. The mRNA expression of these genes was evaluated in a pool of 16 samples from subjects diagnosed with colon cancer and from 16 normal-controls. We observed expression in 13 of the 15 investigated genes from the blood samples of the vast majority of patients considered, but also in a certain percentage of the controls (from 14.3 to 100%). This finding confirms that the extreme sensitivity of RT-PCR is able to detect minimal amounts of mRNA expressed in a non tissue-specific manner ('illegitimate transcription'). On the contrary, NSE1 and GAS mRNAs were not detected either in patient or in control blood samples; however, they were abundantly expressed in normal and cancerous colon mucosa, encouraging further search for useful markers able to detect epithelial cells in peripheral blood.