Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psicothema ; 24(1): 127-32, 2012 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22269375

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to validate in a sample of 205 coronary patients a factor model for the BDI-II, especially a model that would allow for modeling of depressive symptoms after explicitly removing bias related to somatic symptoms of depression that would overlap those of heart disease. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses for ordinal data were conducted. A one-factor model, six correlated two-factor models and, derivatives thereof, seven models with a single General Depression factor and two uncorrelated factors, were analyzed. Exploratory analysis extracted two factors, Somatic-affective and Cognitive. Confirmatory factor analyses showed the worst fit for the one-factor model. Two-factor models were surpassed in goodness of fit by the models of general-factor and group factors. Among these, the General, Somatic-affective and Cognitive (G-Sa-C) model of Beck with students is noteworthy. The reduced General, Somatic and Cognitive (G-S-C) model of Ward showed the worst goodness of fit. Our model surpasses the cutoff criteria of all fit indexes. We conclude that the inclusion of a general-factor and group factors in all the models surpasses the results of G-S-C model and, therefore, questions it. The G-Sa-C model is strengthened.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/psychology , Depression/etiology , Models, Psychological , Personality Inventory , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition , Depression/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Emotions , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychophysiologic Disorders/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...