Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Sex Res ; 55(6): 802-813, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148836

ABSTRACT

Current models of sexual functioning imply an important role for both automatic and controlled appraisals. Accordingly, it can be hypothesized that erectile dysfunction may be due to the automatic activation of negative appraisals at the prospect of sexual intercourse. However, previous research showed that men with sexual dysfunction exhibited relatively strong automatic sex-positive instead of sex-negative associations. This study tested the robustness of this unexpected finding and, additionally, examined the hypothesis that perhaps more specific sex-failure versus sex-success associations are relevant in explaining sexual dysfunction and distress. Male urological patients (N = 70), varying in level of sexual functioning and distress, performed two Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IATs) to assess automatic associations of visual erotic stimuli with attributes representing affective valence ("liking"; positive versus negative) and sexual success versus sexual failure. Consistent with the earlier findings, the lower the scores on sexual functioning, the stronger the automatic sex-positive associations. This association was independent of explicit associations and most prominent in the younger age group. Automatic sex-positive and sex-failure associations showed independent relationships with sexual distress. The relationship between sexual distress and sex-failure associations is consistent with the view that automatic associations with failure may contribute to sexual distress.


Subject(s)
Sexual Behavior/psychology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Association , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 26(6): 513-515, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27846171

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic ureteral injury is a rare but potentially devastating complication of colorectal surgery. We evaluated the incidence and management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery during the transition phase from open to laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single center study. All patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2004 and 2014 were evaluated by collecting data of electronic patient charts. Both acute and elective procedures were included. RESULTS: A total of 3302 colorectal procedures were performed in the study period. Of these, 2817 operations were performed open and 484 laparoscopically. A total of 23 iatrogenic ureteral injuries were identified, of which 5 were found during laparoscopic surgery. The cumulative incidence of ureteral injuries was 0.6% for open procedures and 1.0% for laparoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral injury is a rare complication of colorectal surgery. The incidence might rise with the increasing use of laparoscopy.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/adverse effects , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Ureter/injuries , Ureteral Diseases/epidemiology , Colectomy/methods , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Incidence , Netherlands/epidemiology , Ureteral Diseases/etiology
3.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 30(4): 551-5, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21328472

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the effects on Quality of Life (QoL) of a Brindley procedure, which combines a sacral dorsal root rhizotomy to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity with sacral anterior root stimulation to enable micturition, defecation, and penile erections in complete spinal cord injury (SCI) patients compared to a matched Control Group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. The Qualiveen questionnaire, SF-36 questionnaire, and multiple choice questions about urinary continence and urinary tract infections were sent to 93 patients who had a Brindley stimulator implanted in the Netherlands and a matched Control Group of 70 complete SCI patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Primary study outcomes were Specific Impact of Urinary Problems score and general QoL index of the Qualiveen. RESULTS: Response rates were 78% and 40% for patients with a Brindley stimulator and controls, respectively. Stimulators were still used for micturition in 46 (63%). These patients had a significant better Specific Impact of Urinary Problems score, general QoL index (Qualiveen), and continence rate, and less urinary tract infections compared to the Control Group. Patients also benefited of the rhizotomy with regard to QoL and continence rate if the stimulator was not used anymore. The subscales of the SF-36 had better scores for the patients who used their stimulator as compared to those who did not use the stimulator and compared to the Control Group. CONCLUSIONS: The Brindley stimulator for complete spinal cord injury patients improves Quality of Life, continence, and urinary tract infection rate compared to a matched Control Group.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/psychology , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Implantable Neurostimulators , Male , Middle Aged , Rhizotomy , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychology , Spinal Cord Injuries/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/etiology , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Urinary Incontinence/psychology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...