Rosiglitazone does not alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin.

Rosiglitazone is a potent oral antidiabetic agent of the thiazolidinedione class that works through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptor. It improves insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues and effectively lowers blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Metformin is a dimethyl-biguanide, also used in type 2 diabetes, that lowers fasting blood glucose primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output. Rosiglitazone and metformin reduce plasma glucose concentrations via different mechanisms and thus could potentially be used in combination to optimize glycemic control. This study evaluated the effects of the coadministration of these two agents on the pharmacokinetics of both rosiglitazone and metformin. Sixteen male volunteers (22-55 years old) received oral metformin (500 mg every 12 hours), rosiglitazone (2 mg every 12 hours), or the combination each for 4 days. Plasma collected on day 4 of each regimen was assayed for rosiglitazone and metformin concentrations. Oral doses of rosiglitazone and metformin were safe and well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. There were no clinically significant episodes of hypoglycemia or increased blood lactic acid levels following treatment with any regimen. Coadministration of rosiglitazone and metformin had no significant effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics (AUC(0-12 h), Cmax, tmax, or t1/2) of either drug. The authors conclude that rosiglitazone can be safely administered with metformin and, due to the different mechanisms of action of these agents, may offer a therapeutic advantage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Rosiglitazone does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Rosiglitazone is a potent insulin-sensitizing oral hypoglycemic agent of the thiazolidinedione class that works through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) nuclear receptor and improves glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The potential for a drug-drug interaction with oral digoxin was investigated. Subjects received both of the study regimens in a random sequence: digoxin 0.375 mg plus matching placebo for rosiglitazone orally each morning for 14 days or digoxin 0.375 mg plus 8 mg rosiglitazone orally each morning for 14 days. There was a 14-day washout period between sessions. Blood and urine were collected over 24 hours beginning on the morning of day 14 for measurement of digoxin concentrations. An equivalence statistical approach was used, with rosiglitazone considered to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of digoxin plus rosiglitazone relative to digoxin plus placebo was completely contained within the range (0.80, 1.25) for the primary end points, AUC(0-24), and C24. Digoxin AUC(0-24) and C24 values were similar for digoxin 0.375 mg plus matching placebo (18.5 ng.h/mL and 0.579 ng/mL, respectively) and digoxin 0.375 mg plus rosiglitazone (19.1 ng.h/mL and 0.594 ng/mL, respectively). Point estimates were 1.05 (90% CI: 1.01, 1.10) for AUC(0-24) and 1.04 (90% CI: 0.98, 1.11) for C24. Oral and renal clearance were also similar between regimens. Digoxin alone or in combination with rosiglitazone was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse experience was headache. Coadministration of digoxin with rosiglitazone had no significant effect on the safety or steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

The effect of low-dose cimetidine (200 mg twice daily) on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline.

The potential for nonprescription cimetidine (200 mg twice daily) to affect the pharmacokinetics of sustained-release (SR) theophylline was assessed in 26 male subjects, 13 smokers and 13 nonsmokers. This was a concentration-controlled drug interaction study in which the subjects were administered a dose of SR theophylline every 12 hours to provide a mean steady-state concentration between 8 and 15 micrograms/ml. To determine individual theophylline dose, a test dose of aminophylline was administered, and baseline theophylline pharmacokinetics were determined. Subjects remained on SR theophylline for 23 days and were treated in the following sequence: run-in phase (4 days), treatment 1 (7 days), washout (5 days), and treatment 2 (7 days). During the treatment phases, subjects received cimetidine (200 mg at approximately 08:00 and 12:00) or placebo for 7 days in a randomized crossover fashion. Theophylline pharmacokinetics were determined on days 1, 4, and 7 of both treatment phases. A large day-to-day variability in the oral clearance of theophylline was evident for the theophylline-placebo treatment and the theophylline-cimetidine treatment. Nonprescription strength cimetidine resulted in a mean 5% decrease in theophylline oral clearance on day 1 and a mean 12% decrease on days 4 and 7 combined. There were no significant differences in the cimetidine-theophylline interaction between smokers and nonsmokers. Oral clearance during the nighttime dosing interval was 13% greater than the daytime oral clearance for nonsmokers and 22% greater for smokers, showing a greater circadian rhythm for smokers. In summary, nonprescription doses of cimetidine (400 mg/day) have the potential to produce small changes in theophylline concentrations during steady-state dosing with SR theophylline; however, this effect appears less than changes that occur as a consequence of theophylline's intrasubject variability.

Assessment of the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between erythromycin and argatroban.

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is metabolized in vitro by CYP3A4/5 and therefore may be susceptible to clinically relevant CYP3A drug interactions. The effect of erythromycin, a potent CYP3A4/5 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of argatroban was evaluated in 14 healthy male volunteers in an open-label, crossover study with a 5-day washout between regimens. Argatroban 1 microgram/kg/min was infused alone for 5 hours (regimen A) and again on day 6 of a 7-day oral regimen of 500 mg erythromycin four times daily (regimen B). Serial blood samples for the determination of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and argatroban concentrations were collected for up to 48 hours following infusion. Mean values for argatroban area under the concentration-time curves (AUC0-inf), maximum concentration (Cmax), and half-life (t1/2) were similar between regimens. Mean aPTT values were not affected significantly by the concomitant administration of argatroban and erythromycin compared to argatroban alone. No serious adverse events or bleeding episodes occurred during the study. These results suggest that oxidative metabolism by CYP3A4/5 is unlikely to be an important in vivo elimination pathway for argatroban. Therefore, coadministration of CYP3A4/5 inhibitors should not require a modification in the dosage of argatroban.

Investigación epidemiológica del síndrome convulsivo en pacientes pediátricos internados / Epidemiological research of convulsive syndrome in interned pediatric patients

Se realiza una Investigación Epidemiológica de Niños internados por Síndrome convulsivo en el Hospital Materno Infantil de Mar del Plata durante Los años (1983-1987). Surge de este estudio en primer lugar, un aumento de la tasa de incidencia, avaliando la observación clínica del aumento del Síndrome Convulsivo en los últimos años. Los factores de riesgo más importantes y significativos fueron el parto distórcio, menor edad gestacional y los antecedentes neonatales patológicos. La incidencia de convulsiones febriles, aumentó durante el invierno, coincidiendo con la mayor frecuencia estacional de las infecciones respiratorias agudas. No hubo diferencias significativas entre las Convulsiones Febriles y Afebriles. De acuerdo a la citología el 44,1// fueron de causas conocidas, desconociéndose el 55,9// restante. Con respecto al tratamiento anticonvulsivo se observó un alto porcentaje de pacientes medicados, condicionado por las características de alto riesgo de la población infantil asistida. Tomando como base este diagnóstico de situación epidemiológica, se podrán implementar medidas de prevención y control basadas en los factores de riesgo encontrados (AU)

Investigación epidemiológica del síndrome convulsivo en pacientes pediátricos internados / Epidemiological research of convulsive syndrome in interned pediatric patients

Se realiza una Investigación Epidemiológica de Niños internados por Síndrome convulsivo en el Hospital Materno Infantil de Mar del Plata durante Los años (1983-1987). Surge de este estudio en primer lugar, un aumento de la tasa de incidencia, avaliando la observación clínica del aumento del Síndrome Convulsivo en los últimos años. Los factores de riesgo más importantes y significativos fueron el parto distórcio, menor edad gestacional y los antecedentes neonatales patológicos. La incidencia de convulsiones febriles, aumentó durante el invierno, coincidiendo con la mayor frecuencia estacional de las infecciones respiratorias agudas. No hubo diferencias significativas entre las Convulsiones Febriles y Afebriles. De acuerdo a la citología el 44,1// fueron de causas conocidas, desconociéndose el 55,9// restante. Con respecto al tratamiento anticonvulsivo se observó un alto porcentaje de pacientes medicados, condicionado por las características de alto riesgo de la población infantil asistida. Tomando como base este diagnóstico de situación epidemiológica, se podrán implementar medidas de prevención y control basadas en los factores de riesgo encontrados