The presence of methylation of the p16INK4A gene and human papillomavirus in high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Methylation is a chemical modification in which a methyl group (CH3) is added to the cytosine in the promoter region of the gene. It involves a very frequent epigenetic event that is found in many human cancers. Currently, there is no consensus on whether methylation of the p16 gene could be used as a biomarker in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The authors studied the presence of methylation of the p16 gene and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, and a possible relationship between them in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. This case-control study analyzed 27 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion samples and 20 normal cytology samples. To detect p16 methylation, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used, and for HPV DNA detection the polymerase chain reaction was performed by using MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ consensus primers. The presence of methylation of the promoter region of the p16INK4a gene was detected in 55.6% of the samples from the case group, whereas it was detected only in 20% of the samples from the control group (P=0.005). HPV DNA was found in 66.7% of the samples from the case group, whereas only 15% from the control group (P=0.0001). The relationship between the presence of methylation of the p16 gene and HPV DNA did not prove statistically significant in the case group (P=0.67) or the control group (P=0.51). In conclusion, the presence of methylation of the p16 gene constituted an occurrence that was early but independent of the presence of HPV DNA.

Chronic hidradenitis suppurativa and perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma. A case report.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis is a chronic and suppurative inflammation of the apocrine sudoriparous glands. When located in the genital and perianal regions, it may be associated with cancer. This is the first case report of hidradenitis suppurativa in the vulvar region associated with perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma. CASE: The patient was a 48-year-old woman who presented with extensive hidradenitis suppurativa in the vulvar and perianal regions. She had a 10-year history of hidradenitis suppurativa, previously managed at other institutions, with no satisfactory response. She underwent a simple vulvectomy and resection of the perianal region. A diagnosis of perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma was made. An abdominoperineal resection was performed, followed by a combination of adjuvant radiation. The patient was well for 1 year after treatment. The disease later recurred in the perianal region and resulted in the patient's death. CONCLUSION: Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa of the genital and perianal regions may be clinical or surgical, depending on the extensiveness and seriousness of the disease. Surgery remains the treatment of choice for chronic and severe cases. Association with malignancy, although very rare, is the most serious complication.

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia p53 expression, p53 gene mutation and HPV in recurrent/progressive cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate p53 protein overexpression and p53 gene mutation in primary and recurrent undifferentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), establishing the recurrence and progression rates, median time interval, and sites of the initial lesion and first recurrence, addressing the relationship with HPV infection. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty women with undifferentiated VIN treated with wide surgical excision were followed every 6 months for 7 years and divided into groups with and without recurrence/progression. p53 Protein was detected in paraffin sections using the monoclonal p53 antibody. DNA was extracted from paraffin sections. Polymerase chain reaction/single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis was utilized to screen for p53 gene mutations in exons 5-8. HPV was determined by digesting PCR products with restriction endonucleases. RESULTS: Recurrences were observed in 8 (40%) patients and progression to cancer in 1 (5%). Two cases recurred twice. The median interval for recurrence/progression was 24.5 months. Recurrent/progressive lesions were located in the same area of the initial lesions in 10 cases (91%). p53 Overexpression was observed in 50% (10/20) of primary lesions, of which 45% corresponded to the 9 recurrent/progressive cases. p53 Overexpression was detected in 81.8% (9/11) of recurrent/progressive cases. In the last 2 cases PCR-SSCP showed p53 gene mutation. The rate of HPV infection was higher in the group without recurrence. CONCLUSION: p53 Gene mutation plays an important role in undifferentiated VIN pathogenesis independent of high-risk HPV infection and may predict recurrence or progression to vulvar cancer. Undifferentiated VIN recurrent/progressive VIN lesions have a tendency to occur in the same area of the initial lesions, suggesting a molecular disturbance.