Understanding systemic lupus erythematosus patients' desired outcomes and their perceptions of the risks and benefits of using corticosteroids.

Introduction The use of corticosteroids in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients requires difficult trade-offs between efficacy and risk of toxicity. This qualitative study examined SLE patients' most desired outcomes and their concerns with corticosteroid use in SLE treatment. Methods SLE patients with current/past experience with using corticosteroids were recruited from the clinics at the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center and the University of Maryland Medical Center. Five in-depth interviews ( N = 5) and four focus groups ( N = 15) were conducted during which discussions were transcribed and analyzed based on a grounded theory approach. Results We identified five major themes describing SLE patients' most desired outcomes: reduction in flares, maintenance of normal activities, minimization of treatment side effects, prevention of future organ damage, and finding a cure. Further, SLE patients reported these primary concerns with the adverse effects of corticosteroids: weight gain, organ damage (particularly bone-related damage), mood swings/irritability, sleep disturbances, and dental issues. Patients appeared to be more concerned with adverse effects that immediately affected their day-to-day lives. Conclusion Knowledge gained during this study better informs how patients view the benefits and risks of corticosteroids. This can facilitate discussions between physicians and patients as they work together to determine the appropriate use of corticosteroids.

Mental health services for youths in foster care and disabled youths.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed whether mental health services for youths differ with respect to medical assistance aid category. METHODS: Computerized claims for 15,507 youths with Medicaid insurance in a populous county of a mid-Atlantic state were used to establish population-based prevalence estimates of mental disorders and psychotherapeutic treatments during 1996. RESULTS: An analysis of service claims revealed that the prevalence of mental disorders among youths enrolled in foster care (57%) was twice that of youths receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI; 26%) and nearly 15 times that of other youths receiving other types of aid (4%). Rates of mental health service use were pronounced among foster care youths aged 6 to 14 years. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, and developmental disorders were the most prevalent disorders. Stimulants, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants were the most prevalent medications. CONCLUSIONS: Youths enrolled in foster care and youths receiving SSI use far more mental health services than do youths in other aid categories. Additional research should evaluate the complexity and outcomes of mental health services for youths in foster care.

Trends in the prescribing of psychotropic medications to preschoolers.

CONTEXT: Recent reports on the use of psychotropic medications for preschool-aged children with behavioral and emotional disorders warrant further examination of trends in the type and extent of drug therapy and sociodemographic correlates. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of psychotropic medication use in preschool-aged youths and to show utilization trends across a 5-year span. DESIGN: Ambulatory care prescription records from 2 state Medicaid programs and a salaried group-model health maintenance organization (HMO) were used to perform a population-based analysis of three 1-year cross-sectional data sets (for the years 1991, 1993, and 1995). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: From 1991 to 1995, the number of enrollees aged 2 through 4 years in a Midwestern state Medicaid (MWM) program ranged from 146,369 to 158,060; in a mid-Atlantic state Medicaid (MAM) program, from 34,842 to 54,237; and in an HMO setting in the Northwest, from 19,107 to 19,322. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total, age-specific, and gender-specific utilization prevalences per 1000 enrollees for 3 major psychotropic drug classes (stimulants, antidepressants, and neuroleptics) and 2 leading psychotherapeutic medications (methylphenidate and clonidine); rates of increased use of these drugs from 1991 to 1995, compared across the 3 sites. RESULTS: The 1995 rank order of total prevalence in preschoolers (per 1000) in the MWM program was: stimulants (12.3), 90% of which represents methylphenidate (11.1); antidepressants (3.2); clonidine (2.3); and neuroleptics (0.9). A similar rank order was observed for the MAM program, while the HMO had nearly 3 times more clonidine than antidepressant use (1.9 vs 0.7). Sizable increases in prevalence were noted between 1991 and 1995 across the 3 sites for clonidine, stimulants, and antidepressants, while neuroleptic use increased only slightly. Methylphenidate prevalence in 2- through 4-year-olds increased at each site: MWM, 3-fold; MAM, 1.7-fold; and HMO, 3.1-fold. Decreases occurred in the relative proportions of previously dominant psychotherapeutic agents in the stimulant and antidepressant classes, while increases occurred for newer, less established agents. CONCLUSIONS: In all 3 data sources, psychotropic medications prescribed for preschoolers increased dramatically between 1991 and 1995. The predominance of medications with off-label (unlabeled) indications calls for prospective community-based, multidimensional outcome studies.

Psychotherapeutic medication patterns for youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To describe temporal patterns of office visits for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and stimulant treatment for 5- to 14-year-old US youths; (2) to compare youth visits for ADHD with and without melication according to patient demographics, physician specialty, reimbursement source, and comorbid diagnoses; and (3) to compare office visits for youths with ADHD in relation to common medication patterns (stimulants alone, stimulants with other psychotherapeutic medication, and nonstimulant psychotherapeutic medications alone). DESIGN: Survey based on a national probability sample of office-based physicians in the United States. SETTING: Physician offices. PARTICIPANTS: A systematically sampled group of office-based physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: National estimates of office visits for ADHD and psychotherapeutic drug visits for ADHD for each year and for a combined 8-year period. RESULTS: Youth visits for ADHD as a percentage of total physician visits had a 90% increase, from 1.9% in 1989 to 3.6% in 1996. Stimulant therapy within ADHD youth visits rose from 62.6% in 1989 to 76.6% in 1996. While the majority of non-ADHD youth visits were conducted by primary care physicians, one third of ADHD youth visits were managed by psychiatry and neurology specialists. Health maintenance organization insurance was the reimbursement source for 17.9% of non-ADHD youth visits but only 11.7% of ADHD youth visits. Complex medication therapy was more likely to be prescribed by psychiatrists and less likely to be related to visits with health maintenance organization reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: National survey estimates in the 1990s confirm the substantial increase in visits for youths diagnosed as having ADHD, with more than three quarters of these visits associated with psychotherapeutic medication treatment. Physician specialty and reimbursement source variables identify distinct patient populations with a gradient in psychotherapeutic medication patterns from single-drug standard (stimulant) therapy to complex multidrug treatment regimens for which evidence-based scientific information is lacking.

Racial disparity in psychotropic medications prescribed for youths with Medicaid insurance in Maryland.

DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted using state Medicaid prescription drug reimbursement claims for youths aged 5 through 14 years according to the race of the recipients of psychotropic and medical drugs. METHOD: A person-based data set was created from Medicaid administrative data for fiscal year 1991 from the state of Maryland to yield the following: (1) estimates of prevalence of prescription recipients per 100 eligible enrollees; (2) relative prescription use ratios according to race (African-American versus Caucasian); and (3) the interrelation of race and geographic region on prescription prevalence. RESULTS: Five major findings were observed: (1) African-American youths with Medicaid insurance aged 5 through 14 were less than half (39% to 52%) as likely to have been prescribed psychotropic medications as Caucasian youths with Medicaid insurance; (2) the relative difference for nonpsychotropic medication classes was much less pronounced: African-American youths were prescribed nonpsychotropic medications at a rate 60% to 87% of the Caucasian youths' rate; (3) the stimulants (essentially methylphenidate) had the most disparate African-American/Caucasian ratio (1:2.5); (4) the racial disparity for psychotropics was not altered by partial (noncontinuous enrollment) eligibility status; and (5) although geographic variation reduced the racial disparity, the substantial racial difference (1:2.0) remained. CONCLUSION: Compared with Caucasians, African-American youths aged 5 through 14 with Medicaid insurance coverage showed a distinctly lower rate of treatment with psychopharmacological agents.

Methylphenidate patterns among Medicaid youths.

Treatment of attentional disorders in America has increased dramatically in recent years. This trend is accounted for partly by lengthening the duration of treatment into adulthood for some individuals as well as by increased treatment among girls. Beyond these factors, the role of economic status, race, and geographic region to explain the variation in methylphenidate use is not well understood. Computerized administrative data were used to explore the influence of several sociodemographic factors on the prevalence of methylphenidate use. The data source consisted of Maryland Medicaid prescription drug reimbursement claims data for FY1991 for children ages 5 to 14 years. In effect, the study was restricted to a sample of patients with limited income. The study aims included (1) measuring gender-, age-, race-, and region-specific methylphenidate prevalence for this restricted income population; (2) comparing the Caucasian:African-American (C:A-A) ratio for methylphenidate with the C:A-A ratio for several drug therapies having non-psychotropic uses, specifically the anti-asthma drug, theophylline, and antibiotics for infections; and (3) estimating the average daily dose of methylphenidate from prescription claims data. Total drug-specific prevalence among the 5-14 year olds was 2.2 percent for methylphenidate while age-specific prevalence varied from 0.4 percent (5 year olds) to 3.4 percent (9 year olds). The gender ratio was 3.7:1 (M:F), confirming the increasing trend for girls to receive this medication. Substantial variation across eight defined regions of the state was observed. Racial differences were pronounced: African-Americans were 2.5 times less likely to receive methylphenidate than Caucasian youths. As hypothesized, non-psychotropic drug use was distinctly different from psychotropic drug use in terms of race: theophylline was 1.5 times more likely to be found for African-Americans than Caucasians, whereas antibiotic prescriptions were 1.5 times more likely to be prescribed to Caucasian youths. Average daily dose of methylphenidate was estimated to be 18.7 +/- 10.4 mg for 5-9 year olds and 26.8 +/- 14.0 mg for 10-14 year olds. This brief report confirms the typically lower rate among African-American Medicaid youths for most prescription drugs. The dramatic racial disparity for the psychotropic agent methylphenidate is a new and compelling finding which should be verified among other economic groups. Diagnostic, referral, and cultural bias should be ruled out as possible explanations for the observed differences.