Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 54(8): 1242-1251, 2022 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35320148

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine if a preseason field-based test battery was prospectively associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in elite female footballers. METHODS: In total, 322 elite senior and junior female Australian Rules Football and soccer players had their isometric hip adductor and abductor strength, eccentric knee flexor strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics, and single-leg hop kinematics assessed during the 2019 preseason. Demographic and injury history details were also collected. Footballers were subsequently followed for 18 months for ACL injury. RESULTS: Fifteen noncontact ACL injuries occurred during the follow-up period. Prior ACL injury (odds ratio [OR], 9.68; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.67-31.46), a lower isometric hip adductor to abductor strength ratio (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.09-3.61), greater CMJ peak take-off force (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.09-3.61), and greater single-leg triple vertical hop average dynamic knee valgus (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.06-3.63) and ipsilateral trunk flexion (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.55) were independently associated with an increased risk of subsequent ACL injury. A multivariable prediction model consisting of CMJ peak take-off force, dynamic knee valgus, and ACL injury history that was internally validated classified ACL injured from uninjured footballers with 78% total accuracy. Between-leg asymmetry in lower limb strength and CMJ kinetics were not associated with subsequent ACL injury risk. CONCLUSIONS: Preseason field-based measures of lower limb muscle strength and biomechanics were associated with future noncontact ACL injury in elite female footballers. These risk factors can be used to guide ACL injury screening practices and inform the design of targeted injury prevention training in elite female footballers.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/etiology , Australia , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Muscle Strength/physiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Phys Ther Sport ; 52: 297-304, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34742028

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare lower limb strength and countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics between elite female footballers with and without a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), hamstring strain, or hip/groin injury. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Field-based. PARTICIPANTS: 369 elite female Australian football, soccer and rugby league players aged 15-35. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isometric hip adductor and abductor strength, eccentric knee flexor strength, and CMJ vertical ground reaction forces, including between-leg asymmetry. Players reported their lifetime history of ACLR, and whether they had sustained a hamstring strain, or hip/groin injury in the previous 12-months. RESULTS: Players with a unilateral history of ACLR (n = 24) had significant between-leg asymmetry in eccentric knee flexor strength (mean = -6.3%, 95%CI = -8.7 to -3.9%, P < .001), isometric hip abductor strength (mean = -2.5%, 95%CI = -4.3 to -0.7%, P = .008), and CMJ peak landing force (mean = -5.5%, 95%CI = -10.9 to -0.1%, P = .046). Together, between-leg asymmetry in eccentric knee flexor strength, isometric hip abductor strength, and CMJ peak landing force distinguished between players with and without prior ACLR with 93% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Elite female footballers with a history of ACLR, but not hamstring or hip/groin injury, exhibit persistent between-leg asymmetries in lower limb strength and jump kinetics following a return to sport.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Groin , Hamstring Muscles , Lower Extremity , Muscle Strength , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Athletes , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Groin/injuries , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Kinetics , Knee , Lower Extremity/physiopathology , Rugby , Soccer , Team Sports
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30(7): e230-5, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27010182

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ionizing radiation dose received by the eyes of orthopaedic surgeons during various orthopaedic procedures. Secondary objective was to compare the ionizing radiation dose received between differing experience level. DESIGN: Prospective comparative study between January 2013 and May 2014. SETTING: Westmead Hospital, a Level 1 Trauma Centre for Greater Western Sydney. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 surgeons volunteered to participate within the study. INTERVENTION: Experience level, procedure performed, fluoroscopy time, dose area product, total air kerma, and eye dose received was recorded. Participants were evaluated on procedure and experience level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiation dose received at eye level by the primary surgeon during an orthopaedic procedure. RESULTS: Data from a total of 131 cases was recorded and included for analysis. The mean radiation dose detected at the eye level of the primary surgeon was 0.02 mSv (SD = 0.05 mSv) per procedure. Radiation at eye level was only detected in 31 of the 131 cases. The highest registered dose for a single procedure was 0.31 mSv. Femoral nails and pelvic fixation procedures had a significantly higher mean dose received than other procedure groups (0.04 mSv (SD = 0.07 mSv) and 0.04 mSv (SD = 0.06 mSv), respectively). Comparing the eye doses received by orthopaedic consultants and trainees, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of harmful levels of radiation exposure at eye level to orthopaedic surgeons is low. This risk is greatest during insertion of femoral intramedullary nails and pelvic fixation, and it is recommended that in these situations, surgeons take all reasonable precautions to minimize radiation dose. The orthopaedic trainees in this study were not subjected to higher doses of radiation than their consultant trainers. On the basis of these results, most of the orthopaedic surgeons remain well below the yearly radiation dose of 20 mSv as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection.


Subject(s)
Eye/radiation effects , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Radiation, Ionizing , Adult , Cataract/etiology , Cataract/physiopathology , Cohort Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Risk Assessment , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...