Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
3.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 70(6): 561-6, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11753273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there are no epidemiologic studies on the association between cognitive impairment and noncompliance with antihypertensive therapy. We studied compliance with antihypertensive treatment in elderly patients with cognitive impairment. METHODS: The Rotterdam Study is a prospective community-based cohort study of 7983 residents > or = 55 years old. We studied 1979 participants in the study who had 2 consecutive Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) assessments in the period from 1991 to 1996, who did not have dementia at baseline, and who had received 3 or more consecutive antihypertensive prescriptions for at least 6 months. We compared persons with MMSE scores < or = 25 on both assessments to persons with MMSE scores > 25 on both occasions. Compliance was estimated by dividing the number of days the subjects took antihypertensive drugs by the follow-up period in days, and it was expressed as a ratio between 0 and 1. We defined patients as compliant if they had a compliance ratio > or = 0.80 and as noncompliant if they had a compliance ratio < or = 0.50 during the study period. RESULTS: We followed-up on 1573 patients (mean age, 68 years) during an average period of 1609 days. The risk of noncompliance in cognitively impaired elderly subjects was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 2.8) after adjustment for age, sex, education, income, living situation, and smoking. Stratification by living situation showed that the risk increase predominantly occurred in those who lived alone (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 7.5). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive function is an independent predictor of compliance with antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients who are living alone.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Patient Compliance/psychology , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Assessment , Socioeconomic Factors , World Health Organization
4.
Neurobiol Aging ; 22(3): 407-12, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11378246

ABSTRACT

There is increasing evidence that hypertension may contribute to the development of dementia. We investigated the relation of antihypertensive drug use and the risk of dementia in the cohort of the population based Rotterdam Study. The study cohort included 7046 elderly, free of dementia at baseline. Dementia was diagnosed in a stepwise procedure. Participants were first screened. Screen positives were further tested. Those suspected of dementia underwent a diagnostic work-up. Dementia and its subtypes were diagnosed according to prevailing criteria. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate relative risks. After a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, subjects taking antihypertensive medication at baseline (n = 2015) had a reduced incidence of dementia (adjusted relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.52-1.12). This risk reduction was most pronounced for vascular dementia, (adjusted relative risk, 0.30; 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.99). For Alzheimer's disease the relative risk was 0.87, not significant. Dementia may be prevented by antihypertensive treatment. In order to confirm any relation in Alzheimer's disease larger observational studies with longer follow-up are needed.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Dementia/complications , Dementia/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/etiology , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Dementia/drug therapy , Dementia/etiology , Dementia, Vascular/complications , Dementia, Vascular/drug therapy , Dementia, Vascular/epidemiology , Dementia, Vascular/etiology , Diabetes Complications , Disease Susceptibility , Education , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Smoking
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 134(7): 569-72, 2001 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11281739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outcomes may differ in treated and untreated patients because of a contraindication for treatment in the latter that is independently associated with the outcome of interest. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of confounding by contraindication on risk factors for death in patients taking ibopamine after its use was restricted in early September 1995. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Netherlands. PATIENTS: 1146 patients with congestive heart failure who were prescribed ibopamine at least once and for whom medication history and medical data were available. MEASUREMENTS: Cardiovascular risk factors, clinical characteristics, and medication use. Each patient was assigned an index date (the date of death, or a random date for patients still alive at the end of the study). RESULTS: In univariate analyses comparing patients with an index date before and those with an index date after 8 September 1995, the relative risk for death associated with current use of ibopamine was 3.02 (95% CI, 2.12 to 4.30) compared with 0.71 (CI, 0.53 to 0.96), respectively. In multivariate analyses, the risk for death was 2.62 (CI, 1.76 to 3.90) and 0.93 (CI, 0.84 to 1.02), respectively. CONCLUSION: The marked inversion of the relative risk estimate can be considered a practical example of confounding by contraindication.


Subject(s)
Deoxyepinephrine/analogs & derivatives , Dopamine Agonists , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Cohort Studies , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Contraindications , Deoxyepinephrine/therapeutic use , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
N Engl J Med ; 345(21): 1515-21, 2001 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11794217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may help to prevent Alzheimer's disease. The results, however, are inconsistent. METHODS: We studied the association between the use of NSAIDs and Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia in a prospective, population-based cohort study of 6989 subjects 55 years of age or older who were free of dementia at base line, in 1991. To detect new cases of dementia, follow-up screening was performed in 1993 and 1994 and again in 1997 through 1999. The risk of Alzheimer's disease was estimated in relation to the use of NSAIDs as documented in pharmacy records. We defined four mutually exclusive categories of use: nonuse, short-term use (1 month or less of cumulative use), intermediate-term use (more than 1 but less than 24 months of cumulative use), and long-term use (24 months or more of cumulative use). Adjustments were made by Cox regression analysis for age, sex, education, smoking status, and the use or nonuse of salicylates, histamine Hz-receptor antagonists, antihypertensive agents, and hypoglycemic agents. RESULTS: During an average follow-up period of 6.8 years, dementia developed in 394 subjects, of whom 293 had Alzheimer's disease, 56 vascular dementia, and 45 other types of dementia. The relative risk of Alzheimer's disease was 0.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.29) in subjects with short-term use of NSAIDs, 0.83 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 1.11) in those with intermediate-term use, and 0.20 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.83) in those with long-term use. The risk did not vary according to age. The use of NSAIDs was not associated with a reduction in the risk of vascular dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term use of NSAIDs may protect against Alzheimer's disease but not against vascular dementia.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/prevention & control , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Aged , Cohort Studies , Dementia, Vascular/prevention & control , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk , Salicylates/therapeutic use
8.
Arch Intern Med ; 160(16): 2498-502, 2000 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10979062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the number of elderly women increases in Western society, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is likely to become an increasing problem. Hormone replacement therapy, suggested to protect against coronary atherosclerosis, might also inhibit the development of PAD. METHODS: The association between hormone replacement therapy and the presence of PAD was studied in a population-based study consisting of 2196 naturally menopausal women aged 55 to 80 years living in a suburban area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Peripheral arterial disease was defined as an ankle/arm systolic blood pressure index (ratio of the systolic blood pressure at the ankle to the systolic blood pressure at the arm) lower than 0.9. RESULTS: Hormone replacement therapy for 1 year or longer was associated with a 52% decreased risk of PAD (odds ratio, 0.48 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.85]), while no association was found for therapy duration shorter than 1 year (odds ratio, 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.63) after adjustment for age, smoking, and socioeconomic status. Additional adjustment for body mass index, age at menopause, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alcohol intake, and frequency of visits to health care facilities did not change the results. CONCLUSION: The findings of this population-based study suggest that hormone replacement therapy given for a year or more is associated with a decreased risk of PAD among postmenopausal women.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Treatment Outcome
9.
Stroke ; 30(12): 2562-7, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10582978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Observational data suggest that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease in healthy postmenopausal women. The mechanisms underlying this protection are not entirely clear but may include inhibition of the atherosclerotic process. METHODS: We studied the association between ever use of HRT and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery in 1103 naturally menopausal women, aged 55 to 80 years, in the Rotterdam Study, a community-based cohort study in a suburban area of Rotterdam, Netherlands. Mean and maximum IMT of the common carotid artery were measured noninvasively with B-mode ultrasound. RESULTS: Ever use of HRT for >/=1 year was associated with a decreased mean and maximum IMT compared with never users (mean IMT, 0.719 mm [SE 0.01] versus 0. 742 mm [SE 0.004], P=0.03; maximum IMT, 0.952 mm [SE 0.015] versus 0. 983 mm [SE 0.006], P=0.04), after adjustment for age, smoking, educational level, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. No association was found for use <1 year (mean IMT, 0.739 mm [SE 0.013] versus 0.742 mm [SE 0.004], P=0.69; maximum IMT, 0.990 mm [SE 0.019] versus 0.983 mm [SE 0.006], P=0.75). Additional adjustment for diabetes, frequency of visits to healthcare facilities, or total and HDL cholesterol did not change these results. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this population-based study show that ever use of HRT is associated with a decreased IMT in the common carotid artery in elderly women.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, Common/anatomy & histology , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Tunica Intima/anatomy & histology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Body Mass Index , Educational Status , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Prospective Studies , Smoking/adverse effects , Time Factors
10.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 143(14): 711-3, 1999 Apr 03.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10347624

ABSTRACT

Postmarketing surveillance of medicines includes two activities: pharmacovigilance and pharmaco-epidemiology. Despite the importance of postmarketing surveillance, too few surveillance studies are performed. The studies carried out by the pharmaceutical industry predominantly consist of 'seeding trials': offering prescribing physicians financial rewards if they prescribe a particular product, thus trying to change the prescription habits. The results of such trials are scientifically worthless. These activities cast a shadow on sincere postmarketing surveillance. A recent nationwide cohort study by the Inspectorate for Health Care on mortality in users of ibopamine demonstrates that Dutch medical doctors and pharmacists are very co-operative if further studying of a particular adverse reaction is warranted.


Subject(s)
Drug Monitoring/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/standards , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/organization & administration , Deoxyepinephrine/adverse effects , Deoxyepinephrine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/methods , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effects
11.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 46(1): 71-7, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9690952

ABSTRACT

AIMS: In September 1995, the indication for the oral dopamine agonist ibopamine was restricted in the Netherlands and in several other European countries to patients with NYHA-class II heart failure as a result of an interim analysis of the PRIME-II trial. This trial demonstrated an increased risk of mortality in patients with NYHA-class III/IV heart failure on ibopamine. In September 1995, we initiated an assessment of the effects of ibopamine under everyday circumstances in a cohort of users of ibopamine in all NYHA-classes. METHODS: In a nationwide retrospective cohort study all 2147 community pharmacies and drug dispensing general practitioners received a request to list all patients to whom they had dispensed ibopamine in the preceding years. All responding drug dispensing outlets (DDO) received a questionnaire on cardiovascular risk factors and mortality for the general practitioner of a random sample of these patients. DDO were also requested to send an anonymised printout of the complete medication record. On the end-date of follow-up, February 15th 1996, mortality rates were compared across categories of ibopamine use, adjusted for potential confounders. To assess medication use, drug exposure was compared in a 3 months' period before date of death in the deceased, and before a random date in those patients who were still alive. RESULTS: In patients with NYHA-class III/IV heart failure, multivariate analysis indicated that current use of ibopamine was significantly associated with mortality (RR 1.37;95% CI: 1.15-1.64). In patients with NYHA-class I/II heart failure, however, multivariate analysis showed a 2.03 (95% CI: 1.10-3.72) risk of mortality in current users of ibopamine. Apart from current use of ibopamine, male gender and increased serum creatinine were also independent risk factors for mortality in all NYHA-classes. No statistically significant association was found between mortality and current use of amiodarone or use of amiodarone at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of mortality in patients with NYHA-class III and IV heart failure on ibopamine seems to confirm the main finding of the recently published PRIME-II trial. However, our results indicate that also patients with NYHA-class I/II heart failure may be at an increased risk of mortality when using ibopamine. Additional research on the effects of ibopamine in these patients is warranted and the use of ibopamine in NYHA-class II heart failure patients may have to be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Deoxyepinephrine/analogs & derivatives , Dopamine Agonists/adverse effects , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/mortality , Aged , Cohort Studies , Deoxyepinephrine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Risk Factors
13.
Neurobiol Aging ; 19(6): 607-11, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10192221

ABSTRACT

Recent studies suggest that the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may reduce the risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated the relation of NSAID use over a 10-year period and the risk for incident AD using a nested case-control design in the population-based Rotterdam Study. The study was performed in 306 subjects; 74 Alzheimer patients diagnosed according to NINCDS-ADRDRA criteria and 232 age and sex-matched controls. NSAID use was abstracted from general practitioners' medical records and expressed as cumulative prescription days. The relative risk for AD associated with long-term use (> or = 2 months) was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.46-1.99) as compared to nonusers, after controlling for possible confounders. In a separate examination, subjects who had more than 6 months of prescription days had a reduced relative risk for AD (RR = 0.74 (95% CI: 0.20-2.72). In an age-stratified analysis the effect in long-term users was evident in those aged 85 and under; 0.53 (95% CI: 0.15-1.77). All risk estimates were lower when the last 2 years of exposure were excluded from the analyses. Our point estimates in subjects younger than 85 years and in subjects using NSAIDs for 6 months or more are consistent with the hypothesis that long-term use of NSAIDs reduces the risk for AD. However, overall there was no association between NSAID use and the risk for incident AD.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Risk
14.
Neth J Med ; 51(3): 110-3, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9360411

ABSTRACT

We report on three patients who developed fever after starting treatment with the anti-neoplastic agent, hydroxyurea. Fever occurred within 5 days to 3 weeks after starting treatment. In all cases the causal relationship between fever and use of hydroxyurea was demonstrated by spontaneous recovery after drug withdrawal and was confirmed by recurrence of fever after rechallenge. Other causes were excluded. Fever was accompanied by rash, gastro-intestinal and pulmonary symptoms, and arthralgia. Physicians should be aware of the fact that unexplained fever may be caused by hydroxyurea.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Fever/chemically induced , Hydroxyurea/adverse effects , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hydroxyurea/therapeutic use , Male , Recurrence , Thrombocytosis/blood , Thrombocytosis/drug therapy
15.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 141(28): 1392-5, 1997 Jul 12.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9380201

ABSTRACT

Twenty-one cases of adverse reactions to mebeverine use were reported to the Inspectorate for Health Care in the Netherlands since 1978. In 12 patients (five men and seven women) this was an immunological hypersensitivity reaction. All patients recovered after drug withdrawal. The time between start and onset of symptoms varied from several minutes to 14 days. Most reactions consisted of urticaria or maculopapular rash, sometimes accompanied by fever, polyarthritis, thrombopenia or angioedema. In contradiction to the manufacturer's claims adverse reactions to the use of mebeverine do occur.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Phenethylamines/adverse effects , Adult , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...