Orthopedic Interventions for Foot Deformities in Non-Ambulant People with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Retrospective Study on Indications, Post-Operative and Long-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Progressive equinovarus deformities are common in people with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD); they may provoke pain, pressure spots, cause problems with wearing footwear, and may lead to an unstable sitting position. OBJECTIVE: Explore indications and compare complications and long-term outcomes after soft tissue and osseous interventions in people with DMD. METHODS: Retrospective, monocenter, longitudinal study. Data on indications, equinus and varus deformity before and after surgery, wound healing problems, 'pain', edema, and long-term outcomes were collected from medical files. Soft tissue interventions were compared with osseous interventions. RESULTS: From a series of 18 patients, data on 32 surgical interventions and 169 follow-up visits were analyzed. 'Footrest placement' was the most frequent surgical indication, followed by pain. Osseous interventions were performed in older patients with rigid deformities. Directly after surgery remaining deformities were reported after soft tissue interventions (18 %), no remaining deformities were reported after osseous interventions. Pain and edema were frequently present, especially after osseous surgery. Longitudinal follow-up showed that surgical interventions could lead to a neutral foot for a for more than 3 years on average years. Relapses of foot deformity occurred, especially the recurrence of varus deformity after osseous interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical interventions can successfully lead to a neutral foot position for for more than 3 years on average. Soft tissue interventions appear to be superior to osseous corrections, considering the varus recurrence period and complications, and may be considered when feet are still (partly) correctable. Pain management and edema prevention should be anticipated before surgery. Future research on patient reported outcomes as well as evaluating the outcome of the initial indication is needed to further identify benefits.

Flexion and extension laxity after medial, mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between a spacer- and a tension-guided technique.

PURPOSE: In a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), stability is of utmost importance to promote knee function and to prevent dislocation of the insert. Gap balancing can be guided by the use of spacers or a tensioner. The goal of this study is to compare laxity of a tension-guided implantation technique versus a spacer-guided technique for medial UKA with a mobile bearing. Also clinical function was compared between the groups. METHODS: The tension-guided UKA system (BalanSys™, Mathys Ltd, Bettlach, Switzerland) was compared with a retrospective group with a spacer-guided system (Oxford, Biomet Ltd, Bridgend, UK). A total of 30 tension-guided medial UKAs were implanted and compared with 35 spacer-guided medial prostheses. In both groups, valgus laxity was measured at least 4 months postoperatively in extension and 70° flexion using stress radiographs. Knee Society Scores (KSS) were obtained at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Valgus laxity in flexion was significantly higher in the tension-guided group compared with the spacer-guided group: 3.9° (SD 1.8°) versus 2.4° (SD 1.2°), respectively, P < 0.001). In extension, valgus laxity was significantly different: 1.8° (SD 1.0°) in the tension-guided group compared with 2.7° (SD 0.9°) in the spacer-guided group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the KSS for the two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The tensor-guided system resulted in significantly more valgus laxity in flexion compared with the spacer-guided system. However, in extension, the situation was reversed: the tension-guided system resulted in less valgus laxity than the spacer-guided system. Clinically, there were no differences between the groups. The valgus laxity found with the spacer-guided system better approximates the valgus laxity values of the healthy elderly.