The effect of a structured medication review on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: The study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is symptomatic and frequently consists of complicated medication regimes. This negatively influences therapy adherence, resulting in lower benefit of treatment, drug related problems and decreased quality of life (QoL). A potential effective intervention strategy is a structured medication review, executed by community pharmacists. However, little is known about the effects on clinical endpoints like QoL, as well as on feasibility and cost-effectiveness in PD patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a structured medication review on QoL in PD patients. Secondary objectives are measurements of physical disability, activities in daily life, non-motor symptoms, health state, personal carers' QoL and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, a better insight in the process of performing medication reviews will be obtained from the perspective of community pharmacists. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial we aim to enroll 200 PD patients from the outpatient clinic of three Dutch hospitals. Community pharmacists will perform a structured medication review in half of the assigned patients; the other half will receive usual care. Data obtained by use of six validated questionnaires will be collected at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists will be conducted till data saturation has been reached. DISCUSSION: This trial targets a high-risk patient group for whom optimizing therapy by a structured medication review might be of added value. If effectiveness is proven, this could further promote the implementation of pharmaceutical care in a primary care setting.

Comparing the 2007 and 2011 GOLD Classifications as Predictors of all-Cause Mortality and Morbidity in COPD.

To better classify patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for prognostic purposes and to tailor treatment, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2007 classification was revised in 2011. The primary aim of the current data analyses was to evaluate the accuracy of the GOLD 2007 and 2011 GOLD classifications to predict all-cause mortality and morbidity in a well-described COPD cohort. The prognostic values of both GOLD classifications, expressed as the C-statistic, were assessed in the Cohort of Mortality and Inflammation in COPD (COMIC) study of 795 COPD patients, with a follow-up of 3 years. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and morbidity. Morbidity was defined as time until first COPD-related hospitalisation and time until first community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The prognostic value of the GOLD 2011 classification was compared between symptom classification based on the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) scores with two different thresholds. Although the GOLD 2011 CCQ classification had the highest accuracy to predict mortality and morbidity in our study, the C-statistics differed only numerically. Furthermore, our study showed that the instrument used to determine the level of symptoms in the GOLD 2011 classification has not only important consequences on the mortality prognosis, but also affects the morbidity prognosis in COPD. Therefore, patients' estimated prognosis could alter when different types of tools are used to evaluate the prognosis.

Concomitant prescribing of benzodiazepines during antidepressant therapy in the elderly.

A follow-up study was performed in two ambulatory cohorts aged > or =65 to investigate whether the prevalence and incidence of anxiolytic/hypnotic benzodiazepine drug prescribing is comparable between users of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and users of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). The prevalence and incidence of benzodiazepines during antidepressant therapy was estimated among users of TCAs and SSRIs. Coprescribing of benzodiazepines occurred in 53% of the TCA users and 57% of the SSRI users (prevalence RR 1.1; CI(95) 0.9-1.2). The average duration of benzodiazepine drug use was >65 days per 100 days of antidepressant use. During SSRI therapy, significantly more people started benzodiazepine drug therapy than during TCA therapy (incidence rate ratio (RR) 1.7; CI(95) 1.2-2.4). Analyses repeated 5 years later yielded similar results (overall incidence RR(MH) 1.6; CI(95) 1.3-2.0). These data indicate that SSRI use is associated with a significantly higher chance of starting benzodiazepines compared with TCA use.

Prescribing of gastroprotective drugs among elderly NSAID users in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal toxicity, in particular when risk factors are present. METHODS: A study was performed to investigate concomitant prescribing of gastroprotective agents (H2-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, or misoprostol) in an ambulatory cohort of NSAID users aged 65 years and over. The prevalence of concomitant prescribing was studied, as well as the prophylactic prescribing of gastroprotective drugs. A stepwise logistic regression was performed to determine predictive variables of prophylactic and concomitant gastroprotective drug prescribing. RESULTS: Co-prescribing of gastroprotective drugs occurred in 1522 (23%) (of which 944 concerned prophylactic prescribing) of the NSAID users (n = 6557), with an average duration of 67 days per 100 days of NSAID use. Co-prescribing of gastroprotective drugs varied among individual NSAIDs. Concomitant use of oral corticosteroids (ORadj 2.4; Cl95 2.0-2.9), coumarins (ORadj 1.6; Cl95 1.3-2.0), and low dose aspirin (ORadj 1.6; Cl95 1.4-1.9) were significantly associated with both prophylactic and concomitant prescribing of gastroprotective agents during NSAID therapy. DISCUSSION: Despite current guidelines recommending gastroprotective drug prescribing among high risk groups, the rate of concomitant prescribing of gastroprotective agents in NSAID users aged 65 years and over is low. Feedback to prescribers should be given to improve prescribing practices in this high risk group.