Simple diameter measurement as predictor of liver volume and liver parenchymal disease.

To investigate the accuracy of liver diameters for estimation of liver size and to evaluate their application as tool for assessment of parenchymal liver disease. In the course of a population-based study, (SHIP) one thousand nine hundred thirty-nine volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver including 3D gradient echo MRI sequences. Maximum liver diameters were measured in cranio-caudal (CC), anterior-posterior (AP), medial-lateral (ML) orientation. Diameters were compared with true liver volume assessed by liver segmentation. Additionally, age-dependent reference values for diameters were defined. Finally, accuracy of liver diameters was assessed to discriminate volunteers with healthy livers and participants with parenchymal changes, measured by MRI and laboratory. Reference values of liver diameters within the healthy population (n = 886) were defined as follows (mean ± standard deviation, confidence interval CI in cm): CC 17.2 ± 2, CI 13.6/21.2; AP 15.8 ± 1.9, CI 12.6/19.8; ML 19.7 ± 2.3, CI 15.8/24.6. There was a poor correlation using linear regression between liver diameter and true liver volume; CC 0.393, AP 0.359; ML 0.137. The AP direction shows the best correlation to discriminate between healthy and pathologic liver changes; AUC 0.78; p < 0.001, CC AUC 0.53; p < 0.001 and ML AUC 0.52; p = 0.008. Measurement of liver diameter, especially in the anterior-posterior direction is a simple option to detect chronic liver disease but less suitable for prediction of liver volume.

Reference values of liver volume in Caucasian population and factors influencing liver size.

PURPOSE: To investigate factors influencing liver size and to determine reference values of liver volume (LV) for healthy subjects. METHODS: 2773 volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver in the setting of the population based Study of Health in Pomerania. Based on measurement of maximum diameters in three orientations, LVs were calculated and correlated with demographic factors such as age, gender, and body mass index. In addition, LVs of healthy volunteers and participants with parenchymal liver diseases such as fatty liver disease, iron overload, fibrosis/cirrhosis were compared. Adjusted reference values of liver volumes were defined for the group of healthy participants. RESULTS: In general, mean LV (mean ±â€¯standard deviation) was 1505 ±â€¯385 cm3. Age, gender and body mass index correlated significantly with the liver volume (p ≤ 0.001). Parenchymal liver diseases significantly influence LV (with: 1624 ±â€¯420 cm3, n = 1525 and without parenchymal liver diseases: 1360 ±â€¯273 cm3; n = 1.248, p ≤ 0.001). Compared to LV of participants without liver diseases, LV was increased in volunteers with hepatic steatosis (1717 ±â€¯419 cm3; n = 1111), liver iron overload (1558 ±â€¯367 cm3; n = 553; p ≤ 0.001) as well as in participants with fibrosis/cirrhosis (1494 ±â€¯459 cm3; n = 383). CONCLUSIONS: LV is influenced by age, body mass index and parenchymal liver diseases. Reference values were established to aid in the diagnosis of parenchymal liver diseases.