Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 41(9): 917-922, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27281160

ABSTRACT

The PI2® spacer is designed for treatment of trapeziometacarpal (TM) osteoarthritis. However, the shape of this implant has raised concerns about its stability. We retrospectively investigated 45 implants in 41 patients treated for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in our hospital between 2004 and 2009 who underwent trapeziectomy and insertion of a PI2® spacer. Outcome parameters included revision rates and clinical outcomes correlated with implant position and scaphometacarpal distance, assessed using standard radiographs. A total of 12 implants (27%) were removed at a median time of 10 months (interquartile range (IQR), 7-22 months). These included five dislocations and one early infection. Additionally, a further six patients underwent revision due to persistent pain. Three of these had scapho-trapezoid osteoarthritis, two had developed subluxation of the implant, and one did not show any radiographic abnormalities. A review of patient records revealed that 33 implants remained in place at a median time of 29 months (IQR, 20-57). However, of those, only 21 implants (64%) in 17 patients were available for clinical evaluation at a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR, 19-62 months). No significant differences in clinical outcomes including functional results were observed between in-place ( n = 8) and subluxated ( n = 13) implants. Due to the high revision rate (12/45), consistent with other reports in the literature, we have abandoned the use of the PI2® spacer. We recommend the establishment of a registry for evaluation of future implants. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-series study/level IV.


Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Trapezium Bone/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Chir Main ; 27(4): 160-6, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18678519

ABSTRACT

Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation is a common technique aimed at treating unstable distal radius fractures. We report our experience with extrafocal K-wire fixation in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in 34 patients (AO classification: 10 A2, 5 A3, 14 C1, and 5 C2). The patients' median age was 63 years (range, 16-87 years). K-wires remained in place for a median duration period of 42 days, and a splint was applied during 44 days in median. The median follow-up was 2.5 years (range, 1.3-5 years). At the final follow-up examination, all patients were assessed clinically and bilateral radiographs were taken. The median final range of motion was 69 degrees /64 degrees for extension/flexion, 88 degrees/82 degrees for pronation/supination and 36 degrees/21 degrees for ulnar/radial deviation. Grip strength was 81% of the contralateral side. Using the Gartland-Werley score, 12 patients (35%) had excellent results, 17 (50%) good, and five patients (15%) had fair results. The median final radiographic dorsal tilt was 4.5 degrees (range, 0-14 degrees) and 79% of patients had a loss of volar reduction (median 8 degrees). Radial inclination was in median 20 degrees (range, 10-32 degrees) with 82% of the patients with loss of reduction (median 5 degrees). Radial shortening was in median 0.9 mm (range, -2 to +5 mm) and 62% of patients had median loss of radial length of 1.1mm. Radial shortening was the major source of pain due to ulnar impingement. We found a high complication rate, with 15 patients (44%) suffering from at least one of the 30 reported complications. We did not find any direct correlation between radiographic results and mobility. Although good clinical outcome may be obtained, K-wire fixation cannot be routinely recommended.


Subject(s)
Bone Wires/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Radius Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Hand Strength , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Range of Motion, Articular , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Joint/surgery
3.
Rev Med Suisse ; 3(120): 1792-4, 2007 Aug 02.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17850008

ABSTRACT

The objective was to compare the results of a conservative treatment of non-displaced Jones fractures and of avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal. In 2004/2005 29 fractures of the fifth metatarsal were distinguished into avulsion fractures (n = 21) and Jones fractures (n =8). Six patients with avulsion fractures were lost. We proposed the same treatment for the two groups: Elastic banding, pain killers, crutches if needed and thromboembolic prophylaxis with low molecular heparin. After twelve weeks none of the patients complained about pain. Radiographic consolidation of the fracture was noticed after 7.3 weeks for the Jone's fractures and after 7.1 weeks for the avulsion fractures. We propose symptomatic treatment for the non-displaced avulsion and Jones fractures.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/therapy , Metatarsal Bones/injuries , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Fractures, Bone/classification , Humans , Metatarsal Bones/innervation , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...