Pharmacokinetics of mesalazine pellets in children with inflammatory bowel disease.

Mesalazine is a first-line drug in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and is customarily used to induce and maintain remission in mild to moderate disease. In children, pharmacokinetic data are scarce, and dosage recommendations are largely extrapolated from studies in adults. Aim of the study was to obtain the pharmacokinetic profile of a new mesalazine pellet formulation in children with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. A single oral dose of 20 mg/kg mesalazine was administered to 13 patients (age 6-16 years). Serial blood and urine sampling for determination of mesalazine and acetylmesalazine was performed before and during 24 hours following ingestion. Maximum plasma concentration of mesalazine (Cmax) was 1332 ng/mL (geometric mean, geometric coefficient of variation [CV]: 0.57), obtained 3.7 hours (tmax; CV: 0.31) after drug administration. Systemic exposure as determined by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) ) was 8712 ng/ml*h (CV: 0.44). Terminal half-life of elimination of mesalazine was 3.5 hours (t(1/2); CV: 1.43). This study presents extensive pharmacokinetic data on mesalazine in children with mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis. In comparison with previous experience in adults, pharmacokinetics of mesalazine administered as pellets appear to be similar in both populations.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic data for pravastatin in children, since current data are insufficient in this age group. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A 2-week, multiple-dose, steady-state pharmacokinetic study was carried out with pravastatin 20mg daily in 24 children with familial hypercholesterolaemia (aged 8-16 years; 12 prepubertal, 12 pubertal). A plasma concentration-time curve was performed on day 14. Pharmacokinetic curves for each individual were constructed using nonparametric methods, yielding area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and half-life (t((1/2))). Clearance values and volumes of distribution were calculated from these parameters. Cholesterol lowering was observed on day 14 and 6 weeks after the start of pravastatin. RESULTS: The C(max) in prepubertal (group A) children (52.1 +/- 27.0 mug/L [mean +/- SD]) differed, although not significantly (p = 0.09, unpaired two-tailed t-test), from the C(max) in adolescents (group B) [31.7 +/- 29.2 mug/L]. There was a moderate negative correlation between C(max) and age (Spearman correlation r = -0.42; p = 0.04). The AUC in prepubertal children (91.3 +/- 39.7 mug . h/L) did not differ significantly from the AUC in adolescents (69.3 +/- 57.0 mug . h/L). The t((1/2)) was the same for the two groups: 2.5 +/- 1.1h. Clearance values (CL/f) varied widely between the two groups (group A: 4.3 +/- 1.8 L/min; group B: 11.0 +/- 11.9 L/min; p = 0.08). A moderate positive correlation was found between clearance and age (Spearman correlation r = 0.36; p = 0.09). A large variation was found in the volumes of distribution within the two groups (group A: 31.2 mL/kg [SD 26.7], group B:37.0 mL/kg [SD 29.6]; p = 0.12). A very weak positive correlation was found between age and volume of distribution (Spearman correlation r = 0.11; p = 0.61). A 27% low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol reduction from baseline was achieved at day 14. CONCLUSIONS: Body surface area and gender did not influence the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in children aged 8-16 years. On the basis of our findings there are no reasons to use pravastatin at a dosage according to bodyweight or to use different dosage regimens from those in adults. However, for prepubertal children half the advised starting dose for adults may be sufficient.