Genetic parameter estimates for methane emission during lactation from breath and potential inaccuracies in reliabilities assuming a repeatability versus random regression model.

Methane (CH4) emissions will be added to many national ruminant breeding programs in the coming years. Little is known about the covariance structure of CH4 traits over a lactation, which is important for optimizing recording strategies and to establish optimal genetic evaluation models. Our aim was to study CH4 over a lactation using random regression (RR) models, and to compare the accuracy to a fixed regression repeatability model under different phenotyping strategies. Data were available from repeated measurements of CH4 concentrations (ppm), recorded in the feed bins of milking robots, on 52 commercial dairy farms in the Netherlands. In total, 36,370 averaged weekly records were available from 4,664 cows. Genetic parameters were estimated using a fixed regression model, and a RR model with 1st to 5th order Legendre polynomials for the additive genetic and within lactation permanent environmental effect. The mean heritability was 0.17 ± 0.04, and the mean within lactation repeatability was 0.56 ± 0.03. The genetic correlations between days in milk were high and ranged from 0.34 ± 0.36 to 1.00 ± < 0.01. Permanent environmental correlations showed large deviations and ranged from -0.73 ± 0.08 to 1.00 ± < 0.01. With a large number of full lactation daughter CH4 records per bull, the reliability was not sensitive to using the fixed versus RR model. However, when shorter periods were recorded at the start and end of the lactation, the fixed regression model resulted in a loss of reliability up to 28% for bulls. Assuming the fixed model when the true (co)variance structure is reflected by the RR model, more than twice as long recording from the start of lactation was required to achieve maximum reliability for a bull. Thus, a too simplistic model could result in implementing too little recording, and lower genetic gains than predicted from the reliability.

Heritability and genetic correlations between enteric methane production and concentration recorded by GreenFeed and sniffers on dairy cows.

To reduce methane (CH4) emissions of dairy cows by animal breeding, CH4 measurements have to be recorded on thousands of individual cows. Currently, several techniques are used to phenotype cows for CH4, differing in costs and applicability. However, there is uncertainty about the agreement between techniques. To judge the similarity and repeatability between measurements of different recording techniques, the repeatability, heritability, and genetic correlation are useful metrics. Therefore, our objective was to estimate (1) the repeatability and heritability for CH4 and carbon dioxide production recorded by GreenFeed (GF) and for CH4 and carbon dioxide concentration measured by cost-effective but less accurate sniffers, and (2) the genetic correlation between CH4 recorded with these 2 different on farm and high throughput techniques. Data were available from repeated measurements of CH4 production (grams/day) by GF units and of CH4 concentration (ppm) by sniffers, recorded on commercial dairy farms in the Netherlands. The final data comprised 24,284 GF daily means from 822 cows, 170,826 sniffer daily means from 1,800 cows, and 1,786 daily means from 75 cows by both GF and sniffer (in the same period). Additionally, CH4 records were averaged per week. For daily and weekly mean GF CH4 the heritabilities were 0.19 ± 0.02 and 0.33 ± 0.04, and for daily and weekly mean sniffer CH4 the heritabilities were similar and were 0.18 ± 0.01 and 0.32 ± 0.02, respectively. Phenotypic correlations between GF CH4 production and sniffer CH4 concentration were moderate (0.39 ± 0.03 for daily means and 0.37 ± 0.05 for weekly means). However, genetic correlations were high; 0.71 ± 0.13 for daily means and 0.76 ± 0.15 for weekly means. The high genetic correlation indicates that selection on low CH4 concentrations (ppm) recorded by the cost-effective sniffer method, will result in reduced CH4 production (grams/day) as recorded with GF.

Genetic parameters for repeatedly recorded enteric methane concentrations of dairy cows.

Animal breeding techniques offer potential to reduce enteric emissions of ruminants to lower the environmental impact of dairy farming. The aim of this study was to estimate the heritability and repeatability of methane (CH4) concentrations, using the largest data set from long-term repeatedly recorded CH4 on cows to date, and to evaluate (1) the accuracy of breeding values for different CH4 traits, including using visits or weekly means, and (2) recording strategies (with varying numbers of records and recorded daughters per sire). The data comprised of long-term recording of CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2), from 1,746 Holstein Friesian cows, on 14 commercial dairy farms throughout the Netherlands. Emissions were recorded in 10- to 35-s intervals, between 64 and 436 d, depending on farms. From each robot visit, CH4 and CO2 concentrations were summarized into various traits, averaged per visit and per week: mean, median, mean log, and mean CH4/CO2 ratio. Genetic parameters were estimated with animal repeatability models, using a restricted maximum likelihood procedure, and a relationship matrix based on genotypes and pedigree. The heritability was equal for mean and median CH4 per visit (0.13) but lower for logCH4 and CH4/CO2 (0.07 and 0.01, respectively). Phenotypic and genetic correlations were high (≥0.78) between the CH4 traits, apart from the genetic correlations with the CH4/CO2 trait, which were negative. To achieve a minimum reliability of 50% for the estimated breeding value of a bull, 25 records on mean CH4, measured on 10 different daughters, were sufficient. Although the heritability and repeatability were higher for weekly (0.32 and 0.68, respectively) than for visit mean CH4 (0.13 and 0.30, respectively), the reliabilities of estimated breeding values from visit or weekly means were equal; thus, we found no advantage in averaging records to weekly means for genetic evaluations.