Exploration of symptom dimensions and duration of untreated psychosis within a staging model of schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

AIM: Clinical staging of schizophrenia entails a new method that identifies clusters of symptoms and variation in level of remission, with the goal to create a framework for early intervention. Additionally, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) may influence symptom severity in the first episode of psychosis (FEP) and could necessitate refining of the staging model. However, consistent evidence concerning variation in symptom severity and DUP between stages is missing. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical validity of the staging model by investigating differences in symptom severity across stages in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Second, we assessed if a prolonged DUP is associated with higher symptom severity in FEP. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 291 acutely admitted patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Patients were assigned to clinical stages following the definition of McGorry. Symptom severity was evaluated with the new DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity (CRDPSS). In FEP, we determined the DUP. RESULTS: Significantly higher severity scores of CRDPSS items hallucinations (H = 14.34, df = 4, P-value = .006), negative symptoms (H = 19.678, df = 4, P-value = .001) and impaired cognition (H = 26.294, df = 4, P-value = <.001) were found in more advanced stages of disease. Moreover, patients with FEP and a DUP longer than 1 year showed significantly more severe negative symptoms (U = 314 000, P = .015) compared to patients with a DUP shorter than 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found supporting evidence for the clinical validity of the staging model in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In addition, we found support for refining the stage "first episode" with information concerning the DUP.

Staging and profiling for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Inter-rater reliability after a short training course.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical staging and profiling have been proposed as a new approach in order to refine the diagnostic assessment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. However, only limited evidence is available for the inter-rater reliability of the clinical staging and profiling model. The aim of the present study was therefore to determine the inter-rater reliability of the clinical staging and profiling model for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and to investigate whether a short course can improve inter-rater reliability. METHODS: Consecutively recruited inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were included between January 2015 and January 2016 (study 1), and between March 2018 and October 2018 (study 2). By contrast with the assessors in study 1, all the assessors in study 2 were trained in clinical staging and profiling. We used the clinical staging model proposed by McGorry and identified profile characteristics. Inter-rater reliability was measured using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ICC score for clinical staging in study 1 was moderate (0.578). It improved considerably in study 2 (0.757). In general, the ICC scores for the profile characteristics in studies 1 and 2 ranged from poor to sufficient (0.123-0.781). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that inter-rater reliability in clinical staging was sufficient after training. However, inter-rater reliability for clinical profile characteristics was highly variable. The general implementation of the clinical staging model for schizophrenia spectrum disorders is therefore feasible but clinical profile characteristics should be used with caution.

Exploring construct validity of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders in an acute psychiatric ward.

OBJECTIVE: clinical staging and profiling of schizophrenia spectrum disorders has been proposed to describe and define the heterogenous course of disease. We examined the construct validity of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders by measuring differences in distribution and severity of relevant clinical profilers and therapeutic improvement (HoNOS) across clinical stages. METHODS: we performed a prospective cross-sectional study with 258 inpatiënts who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recruited in an acute ward of a psychiatric hospital from 1-1-2015 until 31-12-2016. All patients (N=258) were assigned to a clinical stage, according to the criteria described by McGorry and clinical profilers were determined. Therapeutic improvement was assessed by measuring change in differences in HoNOS score during admission. RESULTS: significant higher severity scores of clinical profilers were found in more advanced stages compared to earlier stages. This pattern was apparent in the clinical profilers negative symptoms (F=4.56, P<0.01), number of psychotic episodes last year (F=13.65, P<0.01), compliance (F=2.76, P<0.05), work and daily activities (F=9.85, P<0.001), living situation (F=3.71, P<0.05), support of close relatives (F=9.38, P<0.001) and pre-morbid functioning (F=7.33, P<0.001). Judicial background was less prevalent in earlier stages compared to more advanced disease stages. No differences in therapeutic improvement (HoNOS) were found between clinical stages. CONCLUSION: this study demonstrates that clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders has an acceptable construct validity between earlier and more chronic stages of disease. Several clinical profilers increase in more advanced stages compared to earlier clinical stages, which supports construct validity.

Sexual dysfunction and hormonal changes in first episode psychosis patients on olanzapine or risperidone.

Atypical antipsychotics interfere with central and peripheral neurotransmitter systems and with hormonal production. In this study we compared the effect of olanzapine and risperidone on hormonal state and sexual function (by using the Questionnaire for Sexual Dysfunction, QSD) in 40 patients with a first episode psychosis. Results were compared to those of 34 healthy controls. Patients using risperidone had significant higher prolactin levels than patients using olanzapine. Patients using olanzapine had significantly higher 17beta-estradiol levels than patients using risperidone. Overall satisfaction with sexuality was less in patients compared to controls, but not different between patients using olanzapine and those using risperidone. Problems with sexual arousal were significantly higher in patients using olanzapine compared to patients using risperidone. A significantly higher frequency of problems with ejaculation and problems with insensibility of genitals were found in patients compared to healthy controls. We found no relation between medication, prolactin and 17beta-estradiol levels, frequency of sexual activity, overall satisfaction with sexuality and any of the 18 sexual dysfunctions we investigated. Our results suggests that sexual dysfunction in patients with first episode psychosis might occur despite normal prolactin levels. Also, sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in healthy controls. Awareness should be raised of potential sexual problems in young adults.

Subjective experience and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in patients treated with antipsychotics: clinical implications.

OBJECTIVES: This paper gives an overview of studies on the association between dopaminergic neurotransmission and the subjective experience of patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We undertook a review of the literature. RESULTS: Dopaminergic neurotransmission may be relevant for subjective experience. Higher striatal D2 receptor occupancy by typical and atypical antipsychotics is related to worse subjective experience, more severe negative symptoms, and depression. Individuals with lower baseline dopamine function are at an increased risk for dysphoric responses during antipsychotic therapy with dopaminergic-blocking drugs. There is preliminary evidence that a window of striatal D2 receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% is optimal for the subjective experience of patients. These occupancies are often reached even with low dosages of antipsychotic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Reaching an optimal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy is clinically relevant, since subjective experience associated with antipsychotic medication is related to medication compliance. Antipsychotic drug dosages often need to be lower than levels in common use.

Subjective experience and D2 receptor occupancy in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia treated with low-dose olanzapine or haloperidol: a randomized, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the hypothesis that a dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy level between 60% and 70% in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia would result in optimal subjective experience. In addition, they sought preliminary evidence on whether subjective experience is better with low-dose olanzapine than with low-dose haloperidol. METHOD: Subjects (N=24) who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, or haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Subjective experience, psychopathology, and extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at endpoint. After 6 weeks, D(2) receptor occupancy was assessed with [(123)I]iodobenzamide single photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS: The two study groups were similar at baseline. After 6 weeks, patients receiving olanzapine had a significantly lower mean dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy (51.0%, range=36%-67%) than those given haloperidol (65.5%, range=45%-75%). Receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% was associated with optimal subjective experience, and subjective experience improved significantly in the haloperidol group. CONCLUSIONS: A level of D(2) receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% is optimal for subjective experience of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. Substantial interindividual variation in D(2) receptor occupancy was seen at fixed low-dose levels of olanzapine and haloperidol. Olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, showed no superior subjective response over haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Olanzapine may need to be dosed higher than 7.5 mg/day for most patients with recent-onset schizophrenia, and haloperidol needs to be individually titrated in the very low dose range to reach optimal occupancy.