ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Due to its long intracranial course, the abducens nerve is vulnerable in case of acceleration injury of the head. In rare cases, this may lead to posttraumatic paralysis of this cranial nerve. CASE DESCRIPTION A 4-year-old girl visited the emergency department after sustaining a head trauma. Neurological examination revealed no focal abnormalities at first. Three days later, she experienced diplopia, the consequence of isolated abducens nerve paralysis. CT and MRI brain imaging revealed no abnormalities. We treated her with an eye patch for a short time. At examination after 1 year, she was no longer experiencing any symptoms and the paralysis had almost completely disappeared. CONCLUSION Isolated paralysis of the abducens nerve may occur until up to 6 days after a trauma, without any visible intracranial abnormalities revealed by imaging. Even though only few children with this condition have been described, prognosis seems to be favourable and symptoms disappear in the majority of patients. Frequent follow-up by the ophthalmologist and the orthoptist is recommended, possibly with symptomatic treatment of the diplopia.
Subject(s)
Abducens Nerve Injury/complications , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Diplopia/etiology , Paralysis/complications , Abducens Nerve Injury/etiology , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroimaging , Neurologic Examination , Paralysis/etiology , Prognosis , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Sometimes, a conventional recess-resect surgery may not be sufficient to obtain satisfactory ocular alignment. Patients who have previously undergone surgery and/or have a large difference in visual acuity between both eyes and do not wish to undergo surgery on the sound eye provide a surgical challenge. In these cases, tendon elongation with bovine pericardium may be an option. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 38 patients who underwent strabismus surgery with tendon elongation. Before surgery, 31 had exotropia (angle -21.8 ± 5.7 degrees) and 7 esotropia (angle +19.1 ± 5.4 degrees). Reasons for tendon elongation included the following: 15 patients refused surgery on their sound eye; in 15 patients, conventional recess-resect was not possible; and in 7 patients, the elongation best fitted the motility pattern. In one patient, tendon elongation was preferred over conventional recession because of a thin sclera. Follow-up was 0.5 to 4 years. RESULTS: At last follow-up visit, in patients with previous exotropia, the angle was -3.3 ± 5.9 degrees; in patients with previous esotropia, +0.2 ± 0.5 degrees. Most had some duction limitation in the direction of the elongated muscle. All patients but one were satisfied with the result. In the patients with previous exotropia, there was a small but nonsignificant regression to recurrence of the exodeviation (on average 0.5 degree per year). CONCLUSIONS: Tendon elongation is a valuable addition to our strabismus surgery repertoire. However, because of duction limitations after surgery, it should be reserved for those cases in which conventional surgery is not an option.
