Exploiting the natural diversity in adenovirus tropism for therapy and prevention of disease.

Since targeting of recombinant adenovirus vectors to defined cell types in vivo is a major challenge in gene therapy and vaccinology, we explored the natural diversity in human adenovirus tissue tropism. Hereto, we constructed a library of Ad5 vectors carrying fibers from other human serotypes. From this library, we identified vectors that efficiently infect human cells that are important for diverse gene therapy approaches and for induction of immunity. For several medical applications (prenatal diagnosis, artificial bone, vaccination, and cardiovascular disease), we demonstrate the applicability of these novel vectors. In addition, screening cell types derived from different species revealed that cellular receptors for human subgroup B adenoviruses are not conserved between rodents and primates. These results provide a rationale for utilizing elements of human adenovirus serotypes to generate chimeric vectors that improve our knowledge concerning adenovirus biology and widen the therapeutic window for vaccination and many different gene transfer applications.

Role of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning in rats depends critically on the duration of the stimulus and involves both A(1) and A(3) receptors.

OBJECTIVES: There is currently general agreement that adenosine is not involved in ischemic preconditioning (IP) in rat hearts. We hypothesized that the failure to show a role for adenosine is due to the use of brief preconditioning stimuli, and therefore investigated whether adenosine is involved when longer stimuli are employed and which receptor subtypes are involved. METHODS AND RESULTS: Infarct size (IS) was determined in anesthetized rats after 180 min of reperfusion (REP) following a 60-min coronary artery occlusion (CAO). IS was 69+/-2% (n=15) of the risk area in control rats and 45+/-2% (n=19; P<0.05) following IP by a single 15-min CAO. The non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist SPT, which itself had no effect on IS (74+/-1%), blunted the protection by IP (IS=57+/-2%, P<0.05) in a dose of 2 x 5 mg/kg i.v., and abolished the protection (IS=70+/-1%) at 2 x 25 mg/kg i.v. Following IP by three cycles of 3-min CAO and 3-min REP, IS was 24+/-6% (P<0.05), which was not affected by SPT in doses of 2 x 10 and 2 x 25 mg/kg i.v. The A(3) antagonist MRS-1191 (3.3 mg/kg, i.p.), which itself did not affect IS (70+/-2%), blunted the protection by IP with a 15-min CAO (IS=54+/-2%, P<0.05). When 2 x 5 mg/kg SPT (a dose selective for A(1)-receptors, as it did not affect the protection by the A(3) selective agonist IB-MECA, 51+/-3%) and MRS 1191 were combined the protection by IP was abolished (IS=67+/-2%). CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of adenosine in IP in rats depends critically on the duration of the stimulus. Thus, whereas adenosine was not involved when stimuli of 3-min duration were employed, activation of both A(1) and A(3) receptors contributed when a stimulus of 15 min was used.

New insights into cardioprotection by ischemic preconditioning and other forms of stress.

Ischemic preconditioning has not only received wide attention in heart research, but has also been a topic of extensive studies involving other organs. In several of these studies, it has been shown that in spite of differences in the endpoints used to assess protection, the same mediators as in myocardial ischemic preconditioning may be involved. However, several of the putative mediators do not require ischemia to become activated. This has guided us and others to investigate whether the myocardium can also be protected by brief ischemia in other organs and whether other non-pharmacological forms of stress, which do not produce ischemia but are capable of activating these potential mediators, are also cardioprotective.

Hypothermia extends the cardioprotection by ischaemic preconditioning to coronary artery occlusions of longer duration.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that mild hypothermia potentiates the cardioprotection afforded by ischaemic preconditioning so that infarct size limitation can be obtained after coronary artery occlusion (CAO) durations which exceed the cardioprotective range (> 90 min) of either hypothermia or ischaemic preconditioning alone. METHODS: Four groups of anaesthetized rats were subjected to different durations of CAO: (i) normothermia (N, 36.5-37.5 degrees C, n = 29), (ii) normothermia + ischaemic preconditioning (N + IP, 15 min CAO followed by 10 min of reperfusion, n = 35), (iii) hypothermia (H, 30-31 degrees C, n = 31) and (iv) hypothermia + ischaemic preconditioning (H + IP, n = 24). Infarct size (IA/AR) was determined after 3 hours of reperfusion using trypan blue to delineate the area at risk (AR) from non-risk region and nitroblue tetrazolium to delineate infarcted area (IA) from viable myocardium. RESULTS: In N the CAO duration versus infarct size relation had a sigmoid shape with virtually no infarction occurring at 15 min CAO and 56 +/- 5% of the area at risk being infarcted at 30 min CAO reaching a plateau of 71 +/- 2% at 60 min CAO. Hypothermia produced a rightward shift of the relation resulting in an approximately 15 min delay in onset of infarction. Ischaemic preconditioning produced a similar reduction in infarct size (23 +/- 4%) at 30 min CAO compared to hypothermia (13 +/- 3%) but also limited infarct size at 45 min to 36 +/- 3% and at 60 min CAO to 50 +/- 3% suggesting a slowing of infarct progression. Neither intervention limited IA/AR produced by 120 min CAO. In H + IP, combined hypothermia and ischaemic preconditioning resulted in synergistic infarct size reduction so that at 45 min and 60 min CAO IA/AR was reduced to 17 +/- 3% and 23 +/- 3%, respectively, and even at 120 min CAO to 58 +/- 5%, which was significantly smaller than during normothermic control conditions (p < 0.05 vs. N). CONCLUSION: Mild hypothermia limited IA/AR modestly but markedly enhanced the cardioprotection afforded by ischaemic preconditioning in the in situ rat heart so that irreversible damage produced by even prolonged coronary artery occlusions was limited.

Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue.

BACKGROUND: Brief coronary artery occlusions (CAOs) protect both the artery's own perfusion territory ("myocardial preconditioning") and adjacent "virgin" myocardium. Whether ischemia in remote organs protects myocardium is unknown. We examined whether brief occlusion of the anterior mesenteric artery (MAO) or left renal artery (RAO) protects against myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Area at risk (AR) and infarcted area (IA) were determined in anesthetized rats after 180 minutes of reperfusion following a 60-minute CAO. At normothermia (body temperature, 36.5 degrees C to 37.5 degrees C), IA/AR was 68 +/- 2% (mean +/- SEM, n = 11) in control rats and 50 +/- 3% (n = 9, P < .001) in rats preconditioned by 15-minute CAO 10 minutes before 60-minute CAO. A 15-minute MAO was equally protective (IA/AR = 50 +/- 3%, n = 10, P < .001), whereas 15-minute RAO failed to limit IA/AR (72 +/- 5%, n = 8). Hypothermia (body temperature, 30 degrees C to 31 degrees C) did not affect IA/AR (67 +/- 3%, n = 11) in control animals but enhanced protection by 15-minute CAO (IA/AR = 22 +/- 3%, n = 8), whereas protection by 15-minute MAO (IA/AR = 44 +/- 5%, n = 11, P < .001) was minimally enhanced. Hypothermia unmasked protection by 15-minute RAO (IA/AR = 46 +/- 6%, n = 9, P < .01). Hexamethonium (20 mg/kg IV) did not alter protection by 15-minute CAO, but it abolished protection by 15-minute MAO. When MAO was sustained throughout the study, cardioprotection was absent. CONCLUSIONS: Brief ischemia in "remote" organs protects myocardium against infarction as effectively as myocardial preconditioning. The mechanism of protection by MAO differs from that of CAO, because ganglion blockade abolished protection by MAO but not by CAO. The neurogenic pathway is activated during reperfusion after 15-minute MAO, because sustained MAO failed to produce cardioprotection.