Costly carotenoids: a trade-off between predation and infection risk?

Carotenoid reserves in copepods seem costly in terms of predation risk because they make individuals conspicuous. However, carotenoids also seem to play an important role in immune defence as free radical scavengers. To test whether predation risk influences carotenoid levels and whether changes in carotenoid levels are related to changes in immune defence, I examined individual changes in large carotenoid and other lipid droplets upon exposure to predation risk and subsequent exposure to parasites in the copepod Macrocyclops albidus. Copepods reduced carotenoid reserves upon exposure to predators, through which they potentially avoided the costs of being conspicuous under predation risk. Thus, the size of carotenoid reserves is a plastic trait. Such a decrease in carotenoid reserves may also have a negative impact on the copepods' immune system as individuals that decreased their reserves suffered higher parasite prevalence upon exposure to the cestode Schistocephalus solidus. These results suggest that carotenoid reserves may be individually optimized to trade-off each individual's unique costs (predation risk) and benefits (immune defence) of having these reserves.

Is body size or activity of copepods related to ingestion of parasite larvae?

This study shows that ingestion of Schistocephalus solidus coracidia was related to general activity of Macrocyclops albidus copepods at the time of exposure. The lower the activity of the host, the fewer parasites it ingested. In an earlier study it was shown that large M. albidus copepods were less likely to become infected with S. solidus than small copepods, which could potentially be caused by differential ingestion of parasites. However, the current study did not show any evidence for such an effect arising through differential ingestion. Body size was not related to ingestion of parasites, but was positively correlated to activity. So, even though size did not significantly relate to ingestion of parasites, if anything, through their higher activity large copepods rather than small copepods may have ingested more parasites. This study indicates that differences in resistance to this parasite do not come about through differential ingestion of parasites. Also, an earlier study failed to show differential elimination of the parasite from the haemocoel. This leaves avoidance of penetration through the gut wall as the most plausible candidate causing large copepods to be more resistant to this parasite than small copepods.

To avoid or eliminate: cestode infections in copepods.

The outcome of a parasite infection is the result of the interaction between the host and the parasite. In the system we studied, there are 3 critical stages for the outcome of infection of the (intermediate) host, the copepod Macrocyclops albidus, with the cestode Schistocephalus solidus. During the establishment phase of the parasite, the host may firstly avoid ingesting the parasite and, secondly, may prevent the parasite from entering the body cavity and, thirdly, during the growth phase of the parasite, the host's immune system may eliminate the parasite from the body cavity. We were able to study the growth phase separately from the establishment phase. The establishment phase was influenced by characteristics of the host as well as characteristics of the parasites. Small copepods and males performed poorly; they were more often infected and had a lower survival. Parasites from different sib-groups differed in infectivity. During the growth phase some disappearance of parasites was observed. However, this could not be related to any of the studied characteristics of the host, and the sib-groups of parasites did not seem to differ in their likelihood to disappear. Instead, we suggest that disappearance of parasites, once they have entered the body cavity, may be due to intrinsic mortality of the parasites, independent of the host or the sib-group that the parasites belong to. This indicates that the crucial interactions between host and parasite determining the outcome of infection takes place in the short time-period between ingestion and penetration of the gut-wall.