The optimal treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer: minimally invasive lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy - a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the Early-Stage LUNG cancer (ESLUNG) study was to compare outcomes after minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (according to TNM7), treated in 2014-2016 with MIL or SABR, were included. 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated and compared between patients treated with MIL and a propensity score (PS)-weighted SABR population with characteristics comparable to those of the MIL group. RESULTS: 1211 MIL and 972 SABR patients were included. Nodal upstaging occurred in 13.0 % of operated patients. 30-day mortality was 1.0 % after MIL and 0.2 % after SABR. After SABR, the 5-year regional recurrence rate (18.1 versus 14.2 %; HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.58-0.94) and distant metastasis rate (26.2 versus 20.2 %; HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.59-0.88) were significantly higher than after MIL, with similar local recurrence rate (13.1 versus 12.1 %; HR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.68-1.19). Unadjusted 5-year OS and RFS were 70.2 versus 40.3 % and 58.0 versus 25.1 % after MIL and SABR, respectively. PS-weighted, multivariable analyses showed no significant difference in OS (HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.65-1.20) and better RFS after MIL (HR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.49-0.99). CONCLUSION: OS was not significantly different between stage I NSCLC patients treated with MIL and the PS-weighted population of patients treated with SABR. For operable patients with stage I NSCLC, SABR could therefore be an alternative treatment option with comparable OS outcome. However, RFS was better after MIL due to fewer regional recurrences and distant metastases. Future studies should focus on optimization of patient selection for MIL or SABR to further reduce postoperative mortality and morbidity after MIL and nodal failures after SABR.

Patient-reported outcomes after personalised dose-escalation for stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer patients: Results from the randomised ARTFORCE PET-Boost trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ultimate challenge in dose-escalation trials lies in finding the balance between benefit and toxicity. We examined patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The international, randomised, phase 2 ARTFORCE PET-Boost study (NCT01024829) aimed to improve 1-year freedom from local failure rates in patients with stage II-III NSCLC, with a ≥ 4 cm primary tumour. Treatment consisted of an individualised, escalated fraction dose, either to the primary tumour as a whole or to its most FDG-avid subvolume (24 x 3.0-5.4 Gy). Patients received sequential or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or radiotherapy only. Patients were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, and the EuroQol-5D at eight timepoints. We assessed the effect of dose-escalation on C30 sum score through mixed-modelling and evaluated clinically meaningful changes for all outcomes. RESULTS: Between Apr-2010 and Sep-2017, 107 patients were randomised; 102 were included in the current analysis. Compliance rates: baseline 86.3%, 3-months 85.3%, 12-months 80.3%; lowest during radiation treatment 35.0%. A linear mixed-effect (LME) model revealed no significant change in overall HRQoL over time, and no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Physical functioning showed a gradual decline in both groups during treatment and at 18-months follow-up, while clinically meaningful worsening of dyspnoea was seen mainly at 3- and 6-months. CONCLUSION: In patients with LA-NSCLC treated with two dose-escalation strategies, the average patient-reported HRQoL remained stable in both groups, despite frequent patient-reported symptoms, including dyspnoea, dysphagia, and fatigue.

18F-FDG-PET guided vs whole tumour radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (PET-Boost): Results from a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to assess if radiation dose escalation to either the whole primary tumour, or to an 18F-FDG-PET defined subvolume within the primary tumour known to be at high risk of local relapse, could improve local control in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable, stage II-III NSCLC were randomised (1:1) to receive dose-escalated radiotherapy to the whole primary tumour or a PET-defined subvolume, in 24 fractions. The primary endpoint was freedom from local failure (FFLF), assessed by central review of CT-imaging. A phase II 'pick-the-winner' design (alpha = 0.05; beta = 0.80) was applied to detect a 15 % increase in FFLF at 1-year. CLINICALTRIALS: gov:NCT01024829. RESULTS: 150 patients were enrolled. 54 patients were randomised to the whole tumour group and 53 to the PET-subvolume group. The trial was closed early due to slow accrual. Median dose/fraction to the boosted volume was 3.30 Gy in the whole tumour group, and 3.50 Gy in the PET-subvolume group. The 1-year FFLF rate was 97 % (95 %CI 91-100) in whole tumour group, and 91 % (95 %CI 82-100) in the PET-subvolume group. Acute grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 23 (43 %) and 20 (38 %) patients, and late grade ≥ 3 in 12 (22 %) and 17 (32 %), respectively. Grade 5 events occurred in 19 (18 %) patients in total, of which before disease progression in 4 (7 %) in the whole tumour group, and 5 (9 %) in the PET-subvolume group. CONCLUSION: Both strategies met the primary objective to improve local control with 1-year rates. However, both strategies led to unexpected high rates of grade 5 toxicity. Dose differentiation, improved patient selection and better sparing of central structures are proposed to improve dose-escalation strategies.

Bronchial Stenosis in Central Pulmonary Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung tumors has an excellent local control due to the high delivered dose. Proximity of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) to the high dose area may result in pulmonary toxicity. Bronchial stenosis is an adverse event that can occur after high dose to the PBT. Literature on the risk of developing bronchial stenosis is limited. We therefore evaluated the risk of bronchial stenosis for tumors central to the PBT and correlated the dose to the bronchi. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a planning tumor volume (PTV) ≤2 cm from PBT receiving SBRT (8 × 7.5 Gy) between 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Main bronchi and lobar bronchi were manually delineated. Follow-up computed tomography scans were analyzed for bronchial stenosis and atelectasis. Bronchial stenosis was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAEv4). Patient, tumor, dosimetric factors and survival were evaluated between patients with and without stenosis using uni- and multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were analyzed with a median age of 70 years and World Health Organization (WHO) performance status ≤1 in 92.2%. Median follow-up was 36 months (interquartile range [IQR], 19.6-45.4) and median overall survival 48 months (IQR 21.5-59.3). In 15 patients (29.4%) bronchial stenosis was observed on follow-up computed tomography scan. Grade 1 stenosis was seen in 21.6% (n = 11), grade 2 in 7.8% (n = 4). No grade ≥3 stenosis was observed. Median time to stenosis was 9.6 months (IQR 4.4-19.2). Patients who developed stenosis had significantly larger gross tumor volume with a median of 19 cm3(IQR 7.7-63.2) versus 5.2 cm3 (IQR 1.7-11.3, P <.01). Prognostic factors in multivariate analysis for stenosis were age (P = .03; odds ratio [OR] 1.1), baseline dyspnea (P = .02 OR 7.7), and the mean lobar bronchus dose (P = .01; OR 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade (≤2) lobar bronchial stenosis is a complication in approximately one-third of patients after SBRT for lung tumors with a PTV ≤2 cm from PBT. Prognostic risk factors were age, baseline dyspnea and mean dose on a lobar bronchus.

Minimally invasive lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: A minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically operable patients. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is recommended for inoperable patients and has been proposed as a potential alternative for operable patients as well. Here, we present the results of a feasibility study in preparation for a nationwide retrospective cohort study, comparing outcomes between both treatment modalities. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data from patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with MIL or SABR in 2014-2015 were retrieved from databases from 12 Dutch hospitals. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared between MIL and SABR. RESULTS: A total of 597 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with MIL (n = 356) or SABR (n = 241) were included. In total, 106 (30%) patients had died in the MIL group and 142 (59%) in the SABR group. After MIL and SABR, unadjusted 5-year PFS was 63% and 30%, OS was 72% and 38% and LCSS was 81% and 76%, respectively. Propensity score-weighted analyses did not show significant differences between MIL and SABR in OS [hazard ratios (HR) 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.29)], PFS [HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.42-1.32)] or LCSS [HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.42-1.59)]. CONCLUSIONS: Unadjusted analyses revealed superior OS and PFS for MIL and similar LCSS, but this feasibility study was not sufficiently powered to demonstrate significant differences using propensity score methodology. Therefore, this study is currently being extended to include more than half of Dutch hospitals in order to enlarge the population to ≥1880 patients, not only to determine the best treatment for patients with stage I NSCLC overall, but also to assess the preferred treatment for patient groups with specific characteristics.

Importance of tumour volume and histology in trimodality treatment of patients with Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer-results from a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been the backbone of guideline-recommended treatment for Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in selected operable patients with a resectable tumour, good results have been achieved with trimodality treatment (TT). The objective of this bi-institutional analysis of outcomes in patients treated for Stage IIIA NSCLC was to identify particular factors supporting the role of surgery after CRT. METHODS: In a 2-centre retrospective cohort study, patients with Stage III NSCLC (seventh edition TNM) were identified and those patients with Stage IIIA who were treated with CRT or TT between January 2007 and December 2013 were selected. Patient characteristics as well as tumour parameters were evaluated in relation to outcome and whether or not these variables were predictive for the influence of treatment (TT or CRT) on outcome [overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS)]. Estimation of treatment effect on PFS and OS was performed using propensity-weighted cox regression analysis based on inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: From a database of 725 Stage III NSCLC patients, 257 Stage IIIA NSCLC patients, treated with curative intent, were analysed; 186 (72%) with cIIIA-N2 and 71 (28%) with cT3N1/cT4N0 disease. One hundred and ninety-six (76.3%) patients were treated by CRT alone (high-dose radiation with daily low-dose cisplatin) and 61 (23.7%) by TT. The unweighted data showed that TT resulted in better PFS and OS. After weighting for factors predictive of treatment assignment, patients with a large gross tumour volume (>120 cc) had better PFS when treated with TT, and patients with an adenocarcinoma treated with TT had better OS, regardless of tumour volume. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC and large tumour volume, as well as patients with adenocarcinoma, who were selected for TT, had favourable outcome compared to patients receiving CRT. This information can be used to assist multidisciplinary team decision-making and for stratifying patients in studies comparing TT and definitive CRT.

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Treatment modalities, Dutch daily practice and future perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: Several treatment modalities are available for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Over the past decade, these treatment modalities have been further investigated and might have changed current treatment regimens. In this review we present an overview of the treatment options, developments and future perspectives for stage I NSCLC. Furthermore, we describe the current use of these treatment modalities in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bibliographical search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library for publications concerning treatment modalities for stage I NSCLC. In addition, evidence-based guidelines of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) were studied. RESULTS: The guideline-recommended treatment for operable stage I NSCLC patients is a lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection. Inoperable patients or those refusing surgery are offered stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Percutaneous ablation, such as radiofrequency ablation, is a non-surgical minimally invasive technique offered to those who are ineligible for surgery or SABR. The role of systemic therapy is currently limited. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy is being investigated in clinical trials. In the Netherlands, an increasing use of SABR and a relative decrease in resection rates have been observed. CONCLUSION: Surgery and SABR are currently the prevailing treatment modalities for stage I NSCLC patients. Despite optimization of treatment regimens, survival of patients with stage I NSCLC remains to be improved. Future studies are required to optimize treatment strategies, but also to investigate factors influencing treatment decision-making for patients with stage I NSCLC.

Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of Olaparib in Combination with High-dose Radiotherapy with and without Concurrent Cisplatin for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify an MTD of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, in combination with loco-regional radiotherapy with/without cisplatin for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Olaparib dose was escalated in two groups: radiotherapy (66 Gy/24 fractions in 2.75 Gy/fraction) with and without daily cisplatin (6 mg/m2), using time-to-event continual reassessment method with a 1-year dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period. The highest dose level with a DLT probability <15% was defined as MTD. Poly ADP-ribose (PAR) inhibition and radiation-induced PAR-ribosylation (PARylation) were determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with loco-regional or oligometastatic disease (39%) were treated: 11 at olaparib 25 mg twice daily and 17 at 25 mg once daily. The lowest dose level with cisplatin was above the MTD due to hematologic and late esophageal DLT. The MTD without cisplatin was olaparib 25 mg once daily. At a latency of 1-2.8 years, severe pulmonary adverse events (AE) were observed in 5 patients across all dose levels, resulting in 18% grade 5 pulmonary AEs. Exploratory analyses indicate an association with the radiation dose to the lungs. At the MTD, olaparib reduced PAR levels by more than 95% and abolished radiation-induced PARylation. Median follow-up of survivors was 4.1 years. Two-year loco-regional control was 84%, median overall survival in patients with locally advanced NSCLC was 28 months. CONCLUSIONS: Combined mildly hypofractionated radiotherapy and low-dose daily cisplatin and olaparib was not tolerable due to esophageal and hematologic toxicity. Severe pulmonary toxicity was observed as well, even without cisplatin. More conformal radiotherapy schedules with improved pulmonary and esophageal sparing should be explored.

Is pneumonectomy justifiable for patients with a locoregional recurrence or persistent disease after curative intent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

OBJECTIVES: Locoregional recurrence and persistent/progressive disease after curative-intent definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is challenging to manage, as salvage options are limited. Selected patients might be candidates for resection. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients after salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence, focusing specifically on morbidity and mortality after salvage pneumonectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients from 2 tertiary referral hospitals who underwent salvage pulmonary resection for locoregional recurrence or disease persistence/progression >12 weeks after completion of curative intent high dose (>60 Gy) CRT. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and the influence of patient and treatment characteristics on these endpoints was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients treated between 2015-2017 were identified with a median age of 60 years (range 42-72 years), 67 % were male. Median follow-up was 47 months (95 % CI 46-NR). Pneumonectomy was performed in 13/30 (43 %) patients and lobectomy in 17/30 (57 %). Median DFS and OS after pneumonectomy/lobectomy were 14/6 and NR/17 months, respectively. 30 and 90-day mortality for pneumonectomy/lobectomy were 0/12 % and 0/24 % respectively. More favorable survival was seen after pathologically radical resection, i.e. R0, and when surgery was performed more than 12 months after completion of CRT. CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery, including pneumonectomy is associated with acceptable outcomes in selected patients with recurrent or persistent/progressive NSCLC after curative-intent high dose CRT. Patients should be assessed for the probability of an R0 resection, and patients with a locoregional recurrence more than 12 months after treatment with CRT may benefit most from salvage surgery.

The role of surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in octogenarians in the era of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Resection is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in operable patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is recommended for inoperable patients. A shift from surgery to SBRT is expected in elderly patients due to increased frailty and competing risks. We assessed the current influence of age on treatment decision-making and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from patients with clinical stage I NSCLC diagnosed in 2012-2016 and treated with lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge resection, or SBRT, retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient characteristics and OS were compared between SBRT and (sub)lobar resection for patients aged 18-79 and ≥80 years. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: 8764 patients treated with lobectomy (n = 4648), segmentectomy (n = 122), wedge resection (n = 272), or SBRT (n = 3722) were included. In 2012-2016, SBRT was increasingly used for octogenarians and younger patients from 75.3% to 83.7% and from 30.8% to 43.2%, respectively. Five-year OS in the whole population was 70% after surgery versus 39% after SBRT and 50% versus 27% in octogenarians. After correction for age, gender, year of diagnosis, and clinical T-stage, OS was equal after lobectomy and SBRT in the first 2 years after diagnosis. However, after >2 years, OS was better after lobectomy than after SBRT. SBRT is the prevailing treatment in octogenarians with stage I NSCLC. While surgery is associated with better OS than SBRT, factors other than treatment modality (e.g. comorbidity) may have had a significant impact on survival. The wider application of SBRT in octogenarians likely reflects the frailty of this group. Registries and trials are required to identify key determinants of frailty in this specific population to improve patient selection for surgery or SBRT.

Results of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy and resection for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer in The Netherlands.

Introduction: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy remains the main treatment strategy for patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); stage cT3N1 or cT4N0-1 may be eligible for surgery and potentially resectable stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC for neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection. We evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC in The Netherlands.Material and Methods: Primary treatment data of patients with clinically staged IIIA NSCLC between 2010 and 2016 were extracted from The Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient characteristics were tabulated and 5-year overall survival (OS) was calculated and reported.Results: In total, 9,591 patients were diagnosed with stage IIIA NSCLC. Of these patients, 41.3% were treated with chemoradiotherapy, 11.6% by upfront surgery and 428 patients (4.5%) received neoadjuvant treatment followed by resection. The 5-year OS was 26% after chemoradiotherapy, 40% after upfront surgery and 54% after neoadjuvant treatment followed by resection. Clinical over staging was seen in 42.3% of the patients that were operated without neoadjuvant therapy.Conclusion: In The Netherlands, between 2010 and 2016, 4.5% of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC were selected for treatment with neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection. The 5-year OS in these patients exceeded 50%. However, the outcome might be overestimated due to clinical over staging.

Safety and efficacy of reduced dose and margins to involved lymph node metastases in locally advanced NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (Chemo)Radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) causes severe dysphagia due to the radiation dose to the mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Reducing the dose to the mediastinum and the margins to the planning target volume (PTV) might reduce severe toxicity rates. The results of both adaptations in LA-NSCLC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy were analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 308 LA-NSCLC patients were included in an observational study. Both cohorts received hypofractionated RT (24 × 2.75 Gy) of 70 Gy (EQD210) to the primary tumour. The reference-cohort (N = 170) received the same dose of 70 Gy (EQD210) to the involved lymph nodes, while the reduction-cohort (N = 138) received 24 × 2.42 Gy, biologically equivalent to 60 Gy (EQD210). Furthermore, the patient-specific PTV-margins for both the primary tumour and lymph nodes were reduced by 2-3 mm in the reduction-cohort after implementing a carina based correction strategy. The effects on toxicity, regional failure and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: The acute grade 3 (G3) dysphagia and G3 pulmonary toxicity decreased significantly from 12.9% to 3.6% and 4.1% versus 0%, respectively. The regional failures were comparable: 5.9% versus 4.3% (p = 0.546). The median OS was significantly different: 26 months (reference-cohort) versus 35 months (reduction-cohort). After correction for confounders, the association between the reduction-cohort and OS remained significant (HR 0.63 versus HR 0.70). CONCLUSION: A reduction in PTV-margins and dose from 70 Gy to 60 Gy to the involved lymph nodes in LA-NSCLC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy did not result in an increase in regional failures. Moreover, significantly lower acute toxicities and an improved OS were observed in the reduction-cohort.

Local and regional treatment response by 18FDG-PET-CT-scans 4 weeks after concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate associations of early post-treatment 18Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography (FDG-PET)-scans with local (LF), regional (RF), distant failure (DF) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)-patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven stage IIIA-B NSCLC-patients included in a randomized phase II-trial (NTR2230) received 66 Gy (24x2.75 Gy) with low dose Cisplatin +/- Cetuximab. FDG-PET-scans were performed at baseline and 4 weeks post-treatment (range, 1.6-10.1). SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and gross tumor volume were calculated separately for the primary tumor and the involved lymph nodes to generate baseline, post-treatment, and relative response metrics defined as (metricpre-metricpost)/metricpre. Univariable cox regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between PET-metrics and outcomes. RESULTS: Metrics resulted from the post-treatment scan and relative response were associated with outcome, but baseline metrics were not. Primary tumor metrics were stronger associated with all outcomes than lymph node metrics. Both the volumetric (TLG/MTV) and intensity (SUVmax/SUVmean) PET-metrics were associated with OS. The intensity metrics were associated with LF, while the volumetric PET-metrics were associated with RF/DF. This was in contrast to the nodal metrics, demonstrating only an association between RF and the relative response of TLG/MTV. No preference was found between PET volumetric and intensity metrics associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: Early post-treatment PET-metrics are associated with treatment outcome in LA-NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Both volumetric and intensity PET-metrics are useful, but more for the primary tumor than for lymph nodes.

The acute and late toxicity results of a randomized phase II dose-escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer (PET-boost trial).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The PET-boost randomized phase II trial (NCT01024829) investigated dose-escalation to the entire primary tumour or redistributed to regions of high pre-treatment FDG-uptake in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We present a toxicity analysis of the 107 patients randomized in the study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage II-III NSCLC were treated with an isotoxic integrated boost of ≥72 Gy in 24 fractions, with/without chemotherapy and strict dose limits. Toxicity was scored until death according to the CTCAEv3.0. RESULTS: 77 (72%) patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Acute and late ≥G3 occurred in 41% and 25%. For concurrent (C) and sequential or radiotherapy alone (S), the most common acute ≥G3 toxicities were: dysphagia in 14.3% (C) and 3.3% (S), dyspnoea in 2.6% (C) and 6.7% (S), pneumonitis in 0% (C) and 6.7% (S), cardiac toxicity in 6.5% (C) and 3.3% (S). Seventeen patients died of which in 13 patients a possible relation to treatment could not be excluded. In 10 of these 13 patients progressive disease was scored. Fatal pulmonary haemorrhages and oesophageal fistulae were observed in 9 patients. CONCLUSION: Personalized dose-escalation in inoperable NSCLC patients results in higher acute and late toxicity compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. The toxicity, however, was within the boundaries of the pre-defined stopping rules.

A secondary analysis of FDG spatio-temporal consistency in the randomized phase II PET-boost trial in stage II-III NSCLC.

PURPOSE: FDG-PET scans have shown spatial consistency in NSCLC patients before and following chemoradiotherapy, implying radioresistance. We hypothesized that patients, who received FDG-PET redistributed dose painting, would demonstrate reduced spatial consistency when compared to registered patients or to escalated dose treatment. METHODS: Stage II-IIIB, inoperable NSCLC patients were randomized in a phase II trial (NCT01024829) to (chemo)radiotherapy of either homogeneous boosting to the primary tumor, or redistributed inhomogeneous boosting to the GTV subvolume (FDG-SUV > 50% SUVmax). Patients who could not be boosted (≥72 Gy) received 66 Gy in 24 fractions. Spatial consistency of pre-treatment and post-treatment (3 months) FDG-PET scans was measured by various overlap fraction thresholds. RESULTS: 66/82 patients analyzed received randomized treatment in the trial. Thresholds of 50% SUVmax pre-treatment and 70% SUVmax post-treatment yielded a median overlap fraction of 0.63 [interquartile range: 0.15-0.93], with similar results for other thresholds. No significant differences were found among overlap fractions of the treatment groups. A high incidence of FDG-uptake in normal lung (grade-1 pneumonitis: 73%) was found post-treatment. CONCLUSION: FDG redistributed boosting did not reduce FDG spatial consistency from pre-treatment to post-treatment, which was highly variable among patients. The study found high numbers of patients with lung inflammation after treatment.

Heart dose associated with overall survival in locally advanced NSCLC patients treated with hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy.

Association of heart dose and overall survival was investigated in a cohort including 469 locally-advanced NSCLC patients receiving daily low-dose hypofractionated chemo-radiotherapy. Significant associations were found over a range of dose parameters. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations of heart_V2Gy:HR=1.007%-1 (95% CI:1.002-1.013; p=0.006), age:HR=1.026year-1 (1.011-1.042; p=0.001) and GTV volume:HR=1.001cc-1 (1.000-1.002; p=0.006) with overall survival.

Low level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in the management of side effects of chemoradiation therapy in head and neck cancer: part 1: mechanisms of action, dosimetric, and safety considerations.

PURPOSE: There is a large body of evidence supporting the efficacy of low level laser therapy (LLLT), more recently termed photobiomodulation (PBM), for the management of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). Recent advances in PBM technology, together with a better understanding of mechanisms involved, may expand the applications for PBM in the management of other complications associated with HNC treatment. This article (part 1) describes PBM mechanisms of action, dosimetry, and safety aspects and, in doing so, provides a basis for a companion paper (part 2) which describes the potential breadth of potential applications of PBM in the management of side-effects of (chemo)radiation therapy in patients being treated for HNC and proposes PBM parameters. METHODS: This study is a narrative non-systematic review. RESULTS: We review PBM mechanisms of action and dosimetric considerations. Virtually, all conditions modulated by PBM (e.g., ulceration, inflammation, lymphedema, pain, fibrosis, neurological and muscular injury) are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of (chemo)radiation therapy-induced complications in patients treated for HNC. The impact of PBM on tumor behavior and tumor response to treatment has been insufficiently studied. In vitro studies assessing the effect of PBM on tumor cells report conflicting results, perhaps attributable to inconsistencies of PBM power and dose. Nonetheless, the biological bases for the broad clinical activities ascribed to PBM have also been noted to be similar to those activities and pathways associated with negative tumor behaviors and impeded response to treatment. While there are no anecdotal descriptions of poor tumor outcomes in patients treated with PBM, confirming its neutrality with respect to cancer responsiveness is a critical priority. CONCLUSION: Based on its therapeutic effects, PBM may have utility in a broad range of oral, oropharyngeal, facial, and neck complications of HNC treatment. Although evidence suggests that PBM using LLLT is safe in HNC patients, more research is imperative and vigilance remains warranted to detect any potential adverse effects of PBM on cancer treatment outcomes and survival.

Low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in the management of side effects of chemoradiation therapy in head and neck cancer: part 2: proposed applications and treatment protocols.

PURPOSE: There is a large body of evidence supporting the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT), more recently termed photobiomodulation (PBM) for the management of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). Recent advances in PBM technology, together with a better understanding of mechanisms involved and dosimetric parameters may lead to the management of a broader range of complications associated with HNC treatment. This could enhance patient adherence to cancer therapy, and improve quality of life and treatment outcomes. The mechanisms of action, dosimetric, and safety considerations for PBM have been reviewed in part 1. Part 2 discusses the head and neck treatment side effects for which PBM may prove to be effective. In addition, PBM parameters for each of these complications are suggested and future research directions are discussed. METHODS: Narrative review and presentation of PBM parameters are based on current evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: PBM may have potential applications in the management of a broad range of side effects of (chemo)radiation therapy (CRT) in patients being treated for HNC. For OM management, optimal PBM parameters identified were as follows: wavelength, typically between 633 and 685 nm or 780-830 nm; energy density, laser or light-emitting diode (LED) output between 10 and 150 mW; dose, 2-3 J (J/cm(2)), and no more than 6 J/cm(2) on the tissue surface treated; treatment schedule, two to three times a week up to daily; emission type, pulsed (<100 Hz); and route of delivery, intraorally and/or transcutaneously. To facilitate further studies, we propose potentially effective PBM parameters for prophylactic and therapeutic use in supportive care for dermatitis, dysphagia, dry mouth, dysgeusia, trismus, necrosis, lymphedema, and voice/speech alterations. CONCLUSION: PBM may have a role in supportive care for a broad range of complications associated with the treatment of HNC with CRT. The suggested PBM irradiation and dosimetric parameters, which are potentially effective for these complications, are intended to provide guidance for well-designed future studies. It is imperative that such studies include elucidating the effects of PBM on oncology treatment outcomes.

Long-term follow-up of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation dose escalation using hypofractionation might improve overall survival (OS). We investigated OS in a phase II multicenter study in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients treated with hypofractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2-armed phase II, multi-center study (NTR2230) was performed with the aim to assess the effect of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in LA-NSCLC patients (stage II/IIIA/B). Arm A received high dose radiotherapy (24 × 2.75 Gy) and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)). Arm B received an identical treatment regimen with additional weekly cetuximab. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and 1-, 2- and 5-year OS proportions were calculated. RESULTS: Between February 2009 and May 2011, 102 patients were randomly allocated in two arms. Median OS was 31.5 months (range 12.8-52.3), not significantly different between arms A and B; 33.0 (range 17.0-57.0) and 30.0 (11.0-52.0) months. 1-, 2- and 5-year OS rates were 74.5%, 59.4% and 37.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, worse performance score, V35 of the esophagus and the existence of comorbidities were significantly (P-value<0.05) associated with a shorter OS. DISCUSSION: In this phase II trial, the median OS for the entire group was remarkably high; 31.5 months. Furthermore, 5-year OS was still 37.3%. Hypofractionation might contribute to improved OS in LA-NSCLC patients.