The Observable Movement Quality scale for patients with low back pain (OMQ-LBP): validity and reliability in a primary care setting of physical therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Observable Movement Quality scale for patients with low back pain (OMQ-LBP) is a newly developed measurement instrument for use in primary care settings of physical and exercise therapists to assess movement quality (MQ) of patients with low back pain (LBP). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine validity, reliability and feasibility of the OMQ-LBP. The OMQ-LBP consists of a standardized movement circuit (performed twice) consisting of five daily activities problematic for LBP patients, which are scored with an 11-item observation list. METHODS: Construct validity was determined by testing seven hypotheses on associations between constructs (n = 85 patients with LBP) and four hypotheses on known group differences (n = 85 patients with LBP and n = 63 healthy controls; n = 35 matched participant-patients having VAS-pain ≥ 20 mm during and/or after both circuits and healthy controls). Internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha (n = 85 patients with LBP). For inter- and intra-rater reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values were examined (n = 14 therapists: seven primary care physical therapists and seven exercise therapists). Additionally, content validity and feasibility were determined using thematic analysis of a brief interview with participants, patients (n = 38) and therapists (n = 14). RESULTS: After Bonferroni correction 2/7 associations between constructs and 2/4 significant group differences were confirmed. Cronbach's alpha was 0,79. The ICC-values of interrater reliability of the OMQ-LBP total score and the duration score were 0.56 and 0.99 and intra-rater reliability 0.82 and 0,93, respectively. Thematic analysis revealed five themes. Three themes elucidate that both patients and therapists perceived the content of the OMQ-LBP as valid. The fourth theme exhibits that OMQ-LBP provides a clear and unambiguous language for MQ in patients with LBP. Theme 5 depicts that the OMQ-LBP seems feasible, but video recording is time-consuming. CONCLUSIONS: The OMQ-LBP is a promising standardized observational assessment of MQ during the five most problematic daily activities in patients with LBP. It is expected that uniform and objective description and evaluation of MQ add value to clinical reasoning and facilitate uniform communication with patients and colleagues.

Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis--systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To calculate the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) at presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search for relevant studies was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodologic quality of each study by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. The inclusion criteria were met by 50 studies. Heterogeneity was tested, and the presence of publication bias was visually assessed (by using a funnel plot). A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed on a per-patient level. RESULTS: Concerning sensitivity, the selected studies showed moderate heterogeneity. For specificity, low heterogeneity was observed. Moderate-heterogeneity studies that investigated only sensitivity or specificity were excluded from the pooled analyses by using a bivariate random effects model. The majority of the studies (n = 30) used a four-detector row CT scanner. The studies had good methodologic quality. Pooled sensitivity was 98% (95% CI: 97%, 99%), and pooled specificity was 100% (95% CI: 97%, 100%). Potential sources of variability among the studies were variations in the methodologic features (quality score), CT examination procedure (number of rows on the multidetector CT scanner), the standard of reference used, and the prevalence of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. There was evidence for publication bias, which may have led to overestimation of the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography. CONCLUSION: Multidetector CT angiography can be used as a primary examination tool in the diagnostic work-up of patients with SAH.

Influence of a carbohydrate drink on performance of military personnel in NBC protective clothing.

BACKGROUND: The increased threat of nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons underlines the need of protective clothing and gas masks, but this may impair performance. Thus, attention should be focused on the nutritional requirements. HYPOTHESIS: Optimal performance is guaranteed if the supply of water and energy is adequate. METHODS: Two groups of 20 trained military men (mean age 22 yr) received either an isotonic carbohydrate drink or a placebo drink (flavored water) for 24 h under simulated NBC conditions (wearing gas masks and protective clothing). Various physical and mental tests were performed at intervals and blood samples were collected three times. RESULTS: Five men of the placebo group had to be withdrawn during the experiment because of exhaustion. The decrease in physical performance (about 15%) and mental performance (about 20%) was most apparent for the group that had only water for consumption. CONCLUSIONS: When only water is consumed, physical performance of a group of military men decreases during 24 h of simulated NBC conditions. An isotonic carbohydrate drink is recommended with respect to maintaining performance under NBC conditions. Energy restriction prior to an NBC scenario has a negative influence on performance.

[Improved diabetes control through strict observance of the standard 'Type II Diabetes Mellitus' from the Dutch College of Family Physicians]. / Betere diabetesregulatie door strikt volgen van de standaard 'Diabetes mellitus type II' van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of diabetes regulation by strict or less strict observance of the relevant standard protocol of the Netherlands College of General Practitioners (NHG standard). SETTING: Two general practices in the region 'Nieuwe Waterweg Noord', near Rotterdam, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative descriptive study. METHOD: Type II diabetic patients from two general practices were investigated for diabetic symptoms, type of medication, metabolic abnormalities and (risk factors for) complications in relation to their HbA1c as a measure of mean blood glucose regulation. One GP strictly observed the NHG standard as a protocol, the other GP used it as a guideline. RESULTS: Metabolic control was significantly better in the 'strictly observing' general practice than in the 'guideline' practice: HbA1c 7.3% (SD: 1.7) versus 8.1% (1.5) (p < 0.01). Systolic blood pressure was also significantly lower in the 'strict' practice: 141 mmHg (23) versus 155 mmHg (21) (p < 0.01), but mean age was lower and mean duration of diabetes was significantly shorter. The prevalence of macrovascular complications, diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy did not differ significantly in these practices; symptoms of polyneuropathy, however, were found more often in the patients of the 'strict' practice (41% versus 20%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Good metabolic control in patients with type II diabetes mellitus is made possible by strict application of the NHG standard for general practitioners.