Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 156(20): A4394, 2012.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22607840

ABSTRACT

Medical risks of radiation exaggerated; psychological risks underestimated. The discussion about atomic energy has become topical again following the nuclear accident in Fukushima. There is some argument about the gravity of medical and biological consequences of prolonged exposure to radiation. The risk of cancer following a low dose of radiation is usually estimated by linear extrapolation of the incidence of cancer among survivors of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The radiobiological linear-quadratic model (LQ-model) gives a more accurate description of observed data, is radiobiologically more plausible and is better supported by experimental and clinical data. On the basis of this model there is less risk of cancer being induced following radiation exposure. The gravest consequence of Chernobyl and Fukushima is not the medical and biological damage, but the psychological and economical impact on rescue workers and former inhabitants.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radioactive Hazard Release/mortality , Radioactive Hazard Release/psychology , Radioactive Pollutants/adverse effects , Disasters , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Radioactive Hazard Release/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...