ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since p16-Leiden presymptomatic testing for hereditary melanoma has become available in the Netherlands, the benefits and risks of offering such testing are evaluated. The current paper investigated why the non-participants were reluctant to participate in genetic testing. METHODS: Sixty six eligible individuals, who were knowledgeable about the test but had not participated in genetic testing by January 2003, completed a self-report questionnaire assessing motivation, anxiety, family dynamics, risk knowledge and causal attributions. RESULTS: Non-participants reported anxiety levels below clinical significance. A principal components analysis on reasons for non-participation distinguished two underlying motives: emotional and rational motivation. Rational motivation for non-participation was associated with more accurate risk knowledge, the inclination to preselect mutation carriers within the family and lower scores on anxiety. Emotional motivation for non-participation was associated with disease misperceptions, hesitation to communicate unfavourable test results within the family and higher scores on anxiety. CONCLUSION: Rational and emotional motivation for non-participation in the genetic test for hereditary melanoma was found. Emotionally motivated individuals may be reluctant to disseminate genetic risk information. Rationally motivated individuals were better informed than emotionally motivated individuals. It is suggested that a leaflet is added to the invitation letter to enhance informed decision-making about genetic testing.
Subject(s)
Genetic Testing/psychology , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/psychology , Motivation , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Communication , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Family Relations , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, p16 , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Internal-External Control , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Personality Inventory , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
This article describes psychological correlates of quality of life (QOL) in patients on a waiting list for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Variables were selected based on a theoretical model describing psychological correlates of QOL in PTCA patients. This model was based on self-regulation and stress-coping theories. The variables in the model are stress appraisal, coping, coping resources, and general and disease-specific QOL variables. Respondents were 122 patients on a 3-month waiting list for a PTCA. Results indicated that PTCA patients had a poorer QOL than matched healthy controls. Using a path analysis approach to regression analysis, it appeared that goal disturbance, avoidant coping, approach coping, and chest pain were related to QOL. More specifically, chest pain and goal disturbance were only related to health-related QOL and negative affect. Both approach and avoidant coping were related to QOL variables. Results could be explained adequately using self-regulation theory. Recommendations for future research and for form and content of rehabilitation programmes were made.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Chest Pain/psychology , Goals , Quality of Life/psychology , Sickness Impact Profile , Waiting Lists , Affect , Humans , Models, Psychological , Motivation , Netherlands , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Personal Satisfaction , Regression Analysis , Social Support , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to examine psychological distress in a mammography screening process as a consequence of screening after adjusting for background, personality and prescreening distress. Subjects, aged 50 years, were invitees at their first screening. There were three groups; normal findings (n=1407), false-positive findings (n=492) and referents from outside the screening programme (n=1718, age 48-49 years). Distress was measured as illness worry, anxiety, depression, cancer beliefs and early detection behaviour. Measurements were one month before screening invitation with follow-ups at 2 and 12 months postscreening. At 2 months, there was a moderate multivariate effect of group on distress; and intrusive thinking and worry about breast cancer, in particular, were most frequent amongst the false positives. Intrusive thinking still prevailed at 12 months, in addition to a higher perceived breast cancer risk and susceptibility. Distress related to screening and false-positive findings seems to be moderate, but prevailing cancer-specific concerns call for improvements in screening programmes.
