Long-term musculoskeletal function after Open Pelvic ring fractures in Children (OPEC); a multicentre, retrospective case series with follow-up measurement.

Background: The proportion of Open Pelvic fractures in the paediatric population is relatively high. While operative fixation is the primary approach for managing Open Pelvic fractures in adults, there is limited literature on treatment outcomes in Children, particularly regarding long-term musculoskeletal, neurological, and urogenital function. Methods: This multicentre case series included paediatric patients (<18 years old) with Open Pelvic ring fractures treated at one of two major trauma centres in the Netherlands between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2021. Data collection involved clinical records and long-term assessments, including musculoskeletal function, growth disorders, urogenital function, sexual dysfunction, and sensory motor function. Results: A total of 11 patients were included, primarily females (73 %), with a median age at trauma of 12 years (P25-P75 7-14). Most patients had unstable Pelvic ring fractures resulting from high-energy trauma. Surgical interventions were common, with external fixation as the main initial surgical approach (n = 7, 70 %). Complications were observed in eight (73 %) patients. Musculoskeletal function revealed a range of issues in the lower extremity, daily activities, and mental and emotional domain. Long-term radiologic follow-up showed high rates of Pelvic malunion (n = 7, 64 %). Neurological function assessment showed motor and sensory function impairment in a subset of patients. Urogenital function was moderately affected, and sexual dysfunction was limited with most respondents reporting no issues. Conclusion: Paediatric Open Pelvic fractures are challenging injuries associated with significant short-term complications and long-term musculoskeletal and urogenital issues. Further research is needed to develop tailored treatment strategies and improve outcomes of these patients.

Spinal anesthesia in the percutaneous fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Introduction: The number of geriatric patients with a pelvic ring fracture is rising and minimal invasive fixation techniques are increasingly popular. The patient characteristics of these fragile patients are similar to those of patients with a proximal femur fracture. In the field of proximal femur fracture surgery spinal anesthesia is a very commonly used anesthetic technique in this more fragile patient population. Methods: All patients were treated between January 2022 and May 2022 in the Amsterdam UMC location AMC in The Netherlands. The operations were performed by a surgeon who specialized in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery in a hybrid operating theatre. All patient in this case series received spinal anesthesia using 2-2.5 ml glucosated bupivacaine 5 mg/ml. Results: We describe, for the first time, four cases of percutaneous pelvic ring fracture fixation using spinal anesthesia. There were no perioperative or direct postoperative complications. Patients quickly regained the ability to mobilize, reported little pain complaints, and could be safely discharged to either a rehabilitation center or home. Conclusion: We believe spinal anesthesia could be a safe alternative to general anesthesia for the percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring injuries in a selected group of frail elderly patients. A proper assessment should determine whether or not spinal anesthesia is an option in pelvic fracture fixation, taking patient preference, the advice of the anesthetist, the choice of operative technique, and fracture pattern into consideration.

Critical review of the classification and treatment of pediatric pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: Historically most pediatric pelvic fractures were treated non-operatively because of the presumed potential of the pediatric pelvis to remodel and the subsequent increased fracture stability. Currently a wide variety of classifications in pediatric pelvic fractures is used to assess fracture stability and guide treatment, yet none have proven to be ideal since the structural behavior of the pediatric pelvis differs greatly from the adult pelvis. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the use of these different classification systems, fracture (in)stability, the treatment of pediatric pelvic fractures and how it reflects on long-term complications such as pelvic asymmetry and functional outcome. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, Google Scholar and references of the selected articles. Studies that reported on pain, leg length discrepancy (LLD), abnormal gait (GA), pelvic asymmetry, and functional outcomes of pediatric pelvic fractures were included. RESULTS: A total of six different classification systems were used, the most common were Tile (n= 9, 45%) and Torode and Zieg (n= 8, 40%). There was great disparity in treatment choice for the same type of fracture pattern, resulting in several pelvic ring fractures that were defined as unstable being treated non-operatively. Pelvic asymmetry is seen in rates up to 48% in non-operatively treated patients. In contrast, pelvic asymmetry in surgically fixated unstable pelvic fractures was rare, and these patients often showed excellent functional outcomes during follow-up. CONCLUSION: There is a substantial heterogeneity in which fracture patterns are considered to be unstable or in need of surgical fixation. Functional outcomes seem to be correlated with the frequency of pelvic asymmetry and are likely due to an underestimation of the stability of the pelvic fracture. Taking into consideration the force that is necessary to cause a facture in the pediatric pelvis, a fracture of the pelvic ring alone could be suggestive for instability. The results of this review imply that the field of pediatric pelvic surgery is currently not grasping the full scope of the complexity of these fractures, and that there is a need for a pediatric pelvic classification system and evidence-based treatment guideline.

The value of CT compared to radiographs in the classification and treatment plan of trochanteric fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical relevance of classification for trochanteric fractures is limited and little agreement exists on what type of implant should be used. It is unknown whether more advanced radio-diagnostics, such as CT, result in better agreement on the treatment. We assessed the effect of CT on agreement of classification and subsequent treatment for trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven observers (five radiologists, four trauma surgeons and two orthopedic residents) assessed 30 radiographs and CTs of trochanteric fractures. Each rating included an assessment according to the AO classification and of the preferred type of implant. The inter-observer agreement of the AO classification and on the choice of implant was calculated. RESULTS: The inter-observer agreement was κ0.70 (SE 0.03) for radiographic assessment of the main groups of the AO classification and κ0.68 (SE 0.03) for CT assessment. The agreement on choice of implant was κ0.63 (SE 0.05) if the choice was made with radiographs and κ0.69 (SE 0.05) with CTs. Six out of the 13 fractures were classified differently after assessment of the CT. Most corrections in choice of implant occurred for the assessment of A3 fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that trochanteric fractures can be reliably classified on both radiographs and CT, according to the main groups of the AO classification. The implementation of CT for trochanteric fractures does not lead to higher agreement on fracture classification or choice of treatment. Therefore, the clinical relevance of CT for classification of trochanteric fractures seems low. For specific subgroups such as A3 fractures, CT may be of value for adequate fracture classification and subsequent treatment strategies.

[A man with 2 painful feet]. / Een man die niet kan lopen na een sprong.

A 25-year-old man landed a jump with both feet against a vertical rock. He experienced a sharp pain in both ankles and was unable to walk without support. Active plantar flexion could not be performed and the Thompson test was abnormal. The diagnosis bilateral Achilles tendon rupture was made.

Radiographic fracture features predicting failure of internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Fixation-related complications of displaced femoral neck fractures treated by internal fixation are accompanied by high mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study is to investigate the pre- and postoperative radiographic fracture characteristics in relation to patient age and the occurrence of reoperation caused by fixation failure. METHODS: The preoperative radiographs of all patients presenting with a proximal femur fracture between January 2004 and December 2012 were retrospectively assessed for fracture type and dislocation (AP and lateral view). Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture treated by closed reduction and internal fixation were included. The postoperative radiographs were assessed on adequate fracture reduction and correct position of the implant. Patient characteristics and outcome in terms of occurrence of fixation failure (implant breakout, non-union) and reoperation rate were recorded. RESULTS: Hundred and-forty-nine patients were admitted with a displaced femoral neck fracture and treated by internal fixation. Fixation failure was seen in 34 (23%) patients; 9 patients suffered from osteonecrosis. In total, 37 (25%) patients underwent reoperation caused by fixation-related complications. Taking the different age categories into account, 44% of the patients >75 years suffered fixation failure compared with 17% of the patients <65 years. Postoperative incorrect reduction, with persisting dorsoventral dislocation and/or lack of medial support resulted in reoperation in 37% of the patients, compared to 19% reoperations in patients with adequate reduction. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patient age and fracture reduction are important predictors for reoperation. In the preoperative treatment plan, patient age should be taken into account and surgeons should strive for anatomical reduction. Patients over 75 should always undergo arthroplasty. In patients aged 65-75, conversion to arthroplasty should be strongly considered if anatomical reduction is impossible.

The stability of fixation of proximal femoral fractures: a radiostereometric analysis.

The aim of this study was to quantify the stability of fracture-implant complex in fractures after fixation. A total of 15 patients with an undisplaced fracture of the femoral neck, treated with either a dynamic hip screw or three cannulated hip screws, and 16 patients with an AO31-A2 trochanteric fracture treated with a dynamic hip screw or a Gamma Nail, were included. Radiostereometric analysis was used at six weeks, four months and 12 months post-operatively to evaluate shortening and rotation. Migration could be assessed in ten patients with a fracture of the femoral neck and seven with a trochanteric fracture. By four months post-operatively, a mean shortening of 5.4 mm (-0.04 to 16.1) had occurred in the fracture of the femoral neck group and 5.0 mm (-0.13 to 12.9) in the trochanteric fracture group. A wide range of rotation occurred in both types of fracture. Right-sided trochanteric fractures seem more rotationally stable than left-sided fractures. This prospective study shows that migration at the fracture site occurs continuously during the first four post-operative months, after which stabilisation occurs. This information may allow the early recognition of patients at risk of failure of fixation.

The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: The Garden classification is used to classify intracapsular proximal femur fractures. The reliability of this classification is poor and several authors advise a simplified classification of intracapsular hip fractures into non-displaced and displaced fractures. However, this proposed simplified classification has never been tested for its reliability. HYPOTHESIS: We estimate simplifying the classification of femoral neck fractures will lead to a higher inter-observer agreement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten observers, trauma surgeons and residents, from two different institutes classified 100 intracapsular femoral neck fractures. The inter-observer agreements were calculated using the multi-rater Fleiss' kappa. RESULTS: The inter-observer kappa for the Garden classification was 0.31. An agreement of κ0.52 was observed if the Garden classification was simplified and the fractures were classified by our observers as 'non-displaced' or 'displaced'. No difference in reliability was seen for the use of the four-grade Garden classification as well as the simplified classification between trauma surgeons and residents. DISCUSSION: Classification of intracapsular hip fractures according to the four-grade Garden classification is unreliable. The reliability of classification improves when the Garden classification is simplified in a classification using the terms: 'non-displaced' or 'displaced'. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Diagnostic retrospective study.

The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: is it reliable?

The Pauwels classification for the femoral neck fracture is still broadly used in literature and clinical practise. However, this classification has never been tested for its reliability in terms of inter-observer agreement. We assessed whether or not it is reliable to use the Pauwels classification in pre-operative planning. Ten observers classified 100 intra-capsular femur fractures. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the multi-rater Fleiss' kappa. The Pauwels classification showed an inter-observer agreement of κ0.31 (0.01). Classification of intra-capsular hip fractures according to the Pauwels classification using the Pauwels angle is unreliable and its use should be avoided.

The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.

This study compares the reproducibility of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the Jensen classification and the AO/ASIF classification. Furthermore we evaluated the agreement on fracture stability, choice of osteosynthesis, fracture reduction and the accuracy of implant positioning. In order to calculate the inter-, and intra-observer variability 10 observers classified 50 trochanteric fractures. The inter-observer agreement of the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification was kappa0.40 and kappa0.48. The kappa coefficient of the intra-observer reliability of the AO/ASIF classification was kappa0.43 and kappa0.56 for the Jensen classification. Preoperative agreement on fracture stability and type of implant showed kappa values of kappa0.39 and kappa0.65. The postoperative agreement on choice of implant, fracture reduction and position of the implant was kappa0.17, kappa0.29 and kappa0.22, respectively. Both classifications showed poor reproducibility. This study suggests that the definition of stability of trochanteric fractures remains controversial, which possibly complicates the choice of osteosynthesis.