SPUD qPCR assay confirms PREXCEL-Q softwares ability to avoid qPCR inhibition.

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is subject to inhibition by substances that co-purify with nucleic acids during isolation and preparation of samples. Such materials alter the activity of reverse transcriptase (RT) and thermostable DNA polymerase enzymes on which the assay depends. When removal of inhibitory substances by column or reagent-based methods fails or is incomplete, the remaining option of appropriately, precisely and differentially diluting samples and standards to non-inhibitory concentrations is often avoided due to the logistic problem it poses. To address this, we invented the PREXCEL-Q software program to automate the process of calculating the non-inhibitory dilutions for all samples and standards after a preliminary test plate has been performed on an experimental sample mixture. The SPUD assay was used to check for inhibition in each PREXCEL-Q-designed qPCR reaction. When SPUD amplicons or SPUD amplicon-containing plasmids were spiked equally into each qPCR reaction, all reactions demonstrated complete absence of qPCR inhibition. Reactions spiked with about 15,500 SPUD amplicons yielded a Cq of 27.39 plus/minus 0.28 (at about 80.8% efficiency), while reactions spiked with about 7,750 SPUD plasmids yielded a Cq of 23.82 plus/minus 0.15 (at about 97.85% efficiency). This work demonstrates that PREXCEL-Q sample and standard dilution calculations ensure avoidance of qPCR inhibition.

The major neutralizing antigenic site on herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D overlaps a receptor-binding domain.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry is dependent on the interaction of virion glycoprotein D (gD) with one of several cellular receptors. We previously showed that gD binds specifically to two structurally dissimilar receptors, HveA and HveC. We have continued our studies by using (i) a panel of baculovirus-produced gD molecules with various C-terminal truncations and (ii) a series of gD mutants with nonoverlapping 3-amino-acid deletions between residues 222 and 254. Binding of the potent neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb) DL11 (group Ib) was unaffected in forms of gD containing residues 1 to 250 but was greatly diminished in molecules truncated at residue 240 or 234. Both receptor binding and blocking of HSV infection were also affected by these C-terminal truncations. gD-1(234t) bound weakly to both HveA and HveC as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and failed to block infection. Interestingly, gD-1(240t) bound well to both receptors but blocked infection poorly, indicating that receptor binding as measured by ELISA is not the only gD function required for blocking. Optical biosensor studies showed that while gD-1(240t) bound HveC with an affinity similar to that of gD-1(306t), the rates of complex formation and dissociation were significantly faster than for gD-1(306t). Complementation analysis showed that any 3-amino-acid deletion between residues 222 and 251 of gD resulted in a nonfunctional protein. Among this set of proteins, three had lost DL11 reactivity (those with deletions between residues 222 and 230). One of these proteins (deletion 222-224) was expressed as a soluble form in the baculovirus system. This protein did not react with DL11, bound to both HveA and HveC poorly as shown by ELISA, and failed to block HSV infection. Since this protein was bound by several other MAbs that recognize discontinuous epitopes, we conclude that residues 222 to 224 are critical for gD function. We propose that the potent virus-neutralizing activity of DL11 (and other group Ib MAbs) likely reflects an overlap between its epitope and a receptor-binding domain of gD.

Membrane related effects in endothelial cells induced by human cytomegalovirus.

Previously, we have reported on the increase in procoagulant activity of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) after infection with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). When using microvascular endothelial cells from foreskin (MVEC), we also observe a significant increase in membrane perturbation and a concomittant increase in procoagulant activity. This effect is both observed with a laboratory HCMV strain (AD169) with low pathogenicity for endothelium and a HUVEC adapted strain (VHL-E) that readily infects endothelial cells. We compared the membrane perturbation of two types of endothelial cells, HUVEC and MVEC with human embryonal fibroblasts (HEF), being fully permissive for both strains. A membrane effect was only found in endothelial cells. Our results suggest that HCMV induces in MVEC more merocyanine-540 incorporation in the membrane as in HUVEC. The increase in the procoagulant activity induced by HCMV was more pronounced in MVEC than in HUVEC. Inactivated virus, as well as virus pre-incubated with heparin was unable to evoke membrane perturbation. It therefore appears that HCMV induces a rapid membrane response in vascular endothelium and that physical interaction of the virion and the endothelial cell is required to elicit this response.