The increasing importance of LNAA supplementation in phenylketonuria at higher plasma phenylalanine concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Large neutral amino acid (LNAA) treatment has been suggested as alternative to the burdensome severe phenylalanine-restricted diet. While its working mechanisms and optimal composition have recently been further elucidated, the question whether LNAA treatment requires the natural protein-restricted diet, has still remained. OBJECTIVE: Firstly, to determine whether an additional liberalized natural protein-restricted diet could further improve brain amino acid and monoamine concentrations in phenylketonuria mice on LNAA treatment. Secondly, to compare the effect between LNAA treatment (without natural protein) restriction and different levels of a phenylalanine-restricted diet (without LNAA treatment) on brain amino acid and monoamine concentrations in phenylketonuria mice. DESIGN: BTBR Pah-enu2 mice were divided into two experimental groups that received LNAA treatment with either an unrestricted or semi phenylalanine-restricted diet. Control groups included Pah-enu2 mice on the AIN-93 M diet, a severe or semi phenylalanine-restricted diet without LNAA treatment, and wild-type mice receiving the AIN-93 M diet. After ten weeks, brain and plasma samples were collected to measure amino acid profiles and brain monoaminergic neurotransmitter concentrations. RESULTS: Adding a semi phenylalanine-restricted diet to LNAA treatment resulted in lower plasma phenylalanine but comparable brain amino acid and monoamine concentrations as compared to LNAA treatment (without phenylalanine restriction). LNAA treatment (without phenylalanine restriction) resulted in comparable brain monoamine but higher brain phenylalanine concentrations compared to the severe phenylalanine-restricted diet, and significantly higher brain monoamine but comparable phenylalanine concentrations as compared to the semi phenylalanine-restricted diet. CONCLUSIONS: Present results in PKU mice suggest that LNAA treatment in PKU patients does not need the phenylalanine-restricted diet. In PKU mice, LNAA treatment (without phenylalanine restriction) was comparable to a severe phenylalanine-restricted diet with respect to brain monoamine concentrations, notwithstanding the higher plasma and brain phenylalanine concentrations, and resulted in comparable brain phenylalanine concentrations as on a semi phenylalanine-restricted diet.

The significance of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies reactive with intact or denatured human leucocyte antigen in kidney transplantation.

Antibodies recognizing denatured human leucocyte antigen (HLA) can co-react with epitopes on intact HLA or recognize cryptic epitopes which are normally unaccessible to HLA antibodies. Their specificity cannot be distinguished by single antigen beads (SAB) alone, as they carry a mixture of intact and denatured HLA. In this study, we selected pretransplant sera containing donor-specific HLA class I antibodies (DSA) according to regular SAB analysis from 156 kidney transplant recipients. These sera were analysed using a SAB preparation (iBeads) which is largely devoid of denatured HLA class I, and SAB coated with denatured HLA class I antigens. A total of 241 class I DSA were found by regular SAB analysis, of which 152 (63%) were also found by iBeads, whereas 28 (11%) were caused by reactivity with denatured DNA. Patients with DSA defined either by regular SAB or iBeads showed a significantly lower graft survival rate (P = 0·007) compared to those without HLA class I DSA, whereas reactivity to exclusively denatured HLA was not associated with decreased graft survival. In addition, DSA defined by reactivity to class I SAB or class I iBeads occurred more frequently in female patients and in patients with historic HLA sensitization, whereas reactivity to denatured HLA class I was not associated with any of these parameters. Our data suggest that pretransplant donor-specific antibodies against denatured HLA are clinically irrelevant in patients already sensitized against intact HLA.

Serum thymus and activation regulated chemokine levels post-lung transplantation as a predictor for the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

The main reason for mortality after lung transplantation is the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), which represents chronic rejection. As soluble CD30, which is produced mainly by activated T helper 2 (Th2) cells, was shown to be related to development of BOS, we aimed to investigate the relation between development of BOS and Th2 chemoattractant thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17). In 54 patients we measured serum TARC levels prior to transplantation by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and in 44 of these patients sera were analysed at months 1, 2 and 3 after lung transplantation. In addition, longitudinal measurements were performed in sera from eight healthy controls and 14 patients, the latter taken over a period of 2 years post-transplantation from seven patients developing BOS plus seven clinically matched BOS-free patients. Median serum TARC levels post-transplantation of patients who developed BOS were significantly lower than those of the matched BOS-free patients (P = 0.05). A receiver operating characteristics analysis (area under the curve 0.77), together with a Kaplan-Meyer analysis, showed that serum TARC levels below 325 pg/ml in the first month post-transplantation can predict development of BOS post-transplantation (P = 0.001). In contrast, pretransplant serum TARC levels were not significantly different between patients developing BOS, BOS-free patients or healthy controls. In conclusion, pretransplantation serum TARC levels do not predict the development of BOS post-transplantation, but measurement of the serum TARC levels in the first month directly after transplantation can provide us with a tool to identify the group at risk of developing BOS.

Prevalence and clinical significance of resistance to perforin- and FAS-mediated cell death in leukemia.

Killer lymphocytes play a central therapeutic role in graft-versus-leukemia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The Perforin/Granzyme and FAS/CD95 pathways are of crucial importance in tumor cell elimination by killer cells. In this study, we have examined whether hematological malignancies are resistant to perforin and anti-FAS antibodies. Leukemic cells were studied from 29 patients suffering either from acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), acute or chronic lymphoid leukemia, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. An average of 49 vs 5% of specific cell killing was found when using perforin vs anti-FAS antibodies, respectively. Interestingly, resistance towards both perforin and anti-FAS antibodies was found exclusively in leukemic cells from patients with myeloid leukemia. Analysis of leukemic cells from patients with CML, suffering from leukemia relapse after HSCT and given donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) to induce remission, indicated that the effectiveness of treatment with DLI was not associated with sensitivity of leukemic cells to perforin. In conclusion, resistance towards anti-FAS antibodies is a common phenomenon in leukemia/lymphoma, whereas perforin resistance occurs only in myeloid leukemia. However, as a single parameter, perforin resistance does not appear to be suitable to predict the outcome of DLI.