ABSTRACT
A heavy admixture of blood in cervical smears can be problematic for the screener, as the presence of blood can influence the staining quality of the cancer cell nuclei. However, it might also be a blessing in disguise. A retrospective study of 40 clinically important smears, 34 originally signed out as negative for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and 6 smears as unsatisfactory, was carried out in comparison with 100 smears from healthy women. Sample parameters were analyzed by macroscopy and neural network scanning. Differences between the two study groups were measured by Pearson's chi(2) test. Of the 40 study cases, one case featured insufficient material, while 16 cases (40%) could confidently be classified as malignant or negative for malignancy. The most important macroscopic parameter of the smears was an admixture of blood. This background feature was also highlighted by the NNS system. Angiogenesis was visualized by the expression of CD34 in many sampled capillary fragments included in the smears. In conclusion, blood in cervical smears may have clinical and diagnostic significance. The rate of "failed smears" in routine cervical screening might thus by CD34 be considerably decreased.
Subject(s)
Blood , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears , Antigens, CD34/biosynthesis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Female , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/metabolism , Vaginal Smears/methodsABSTRACT
The expression of Fas and FasL was studied in 86 patients with benign, borderline, and malignant serous ovarian lesions. Four normal ovaries, and monolayer epithelial cultures from a human fetal ovary, a borderline, and a serous adenocarcinoma were used for comparison. Expression of Fas and FasL was studied immunohistochemically and flowcytometrically. Fas was expressed in all 90 lesions; FasL in 57 lesions, including 2 normal ovaries. Fas expression was significantly increased in borderline tumors compared with benign (P = 0.005, t = -2.94) or malignant serous tumors (P = 0.0001, t = 4.15). FasL expression was significantly increased in malignant tumors compared with benign (P = 0.039, t = -2.10) and borderline tumors (P = 0.0016, t = -3.33). Flow cytometry showed a range of Fas expression in short-term cultures isolated from normal, borderline, and malignant ovarian serous tissue; in the few samples studied, FasL was not expressed. Expression in three serous ovarian cell lines was similar. Fas and FasL expression differed throughout the spectrum of ovarian lesions. FasL expression was increased in malignant tumors, and Fas expression was increased in borderline tumors. Changes in Fas/FasL expression in ovarian surface epithelium might play a functional role in the biology of ovarian tumors.
