ABSTRACT
Background: Arthropathy following repeated bleeding is common in persons with hemophilia. Since the introduction of prophylaxis, treatment has intensified and joint health has improved. However, data on the long-term development of arthropathy are still scant. Objectives: To evaluate long-term arthropathy development since the introduction of prophylaxis according to birth cohort, hemophilia severity, and inhibitor status. Methods: This single-center historic cohort study included persons with severe and moderate hemophilia A and hemophilia B born between 1935 and 2005. Arthropathy on X-rays was evaluated using the Pettersson score. Patient and joint characteristics were studied per birth cohort (<1970, 1970-1980, 1981-1990, and >1990) and compared according to hemophilia severity. The distribution of affected joints and cumulative incidence of arthropathy were analyzed. The association of Pettersson score with birth cohort and inhibitor characteristics was explored using multivariable regression analyses adjusted for age at evaluation. Results: In total, 1064 X-rays of 363 patients were analyzed. Of persons with severe hemophilia (n = 317, 87.3%), 244 (77.0%) developed arthropathy. Prophylaxis was started at younger ages over time, from a median of 18 to 2.1 years, and concomitantly, arthropathy decreased in consecutive birth cohorts. Ankles were most commonly affected in 188 of 258 (72.9%) patients. Persons with moderate hemophilia (n = 46, 12.7%) had a lower risk of arthropathy (27/46 [58.7%]), but a reduction over time was less pronounced. In the multivariable analyses, birth cohort and age at evaluation were predictors for the development of arthropathy, while inhibitor status showed no association. Conclusion: The development and severity of arthropathy have decreased over the past decades. However, patients have remained at risk for developing arthropathy, especially in their ankles.
ABSTRACT
Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), the smokeless alternative to conventional tobacco cigarettes, have become increasingly popular. E-cigarettes vaporise e-liquid, a solution of highly concentrated nicotine, propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerine (VG). With the popularity of e-cigarettes, e-liquid refills have become easily accessible and several cases of intoxication due to the ingestion of e-liquid have been reported. We provide an overview of these cases, their pathophysiology and patients' characteristics.Methods: We carried out a retrospective evaluation of the scientific literature reporting on cases of liquid nicotine intoxication, using the following inclusion criteria: (1) the article is or contains a case report, (2) describes an intoxication with e-liquid, (3) the substance contains nicotine, and (4) intake is oral, intravenous or subcutaneous.Results: We found 26 case reports describing a total of 31 patients who suffered from e-liquid intoxication. All intoxications up to the age of six were reported as unintentional, whereas nearly all cases from ages 13 to 53 were due to suicide attempts. The three most prevalent symptoms of e-liquid intoxication were tachycardia, altered mental status and vomiting. Eleven cases resulted in the death of the patient. In the survivors, the highest plasma concentration of nicotine was 800 µg L-1, while the lowest concentration in the non-survivors was 1600 µg L-1.Conclusions: There is a mismatch between the generally accepted lethal oral nicotine dose of 60 mg, resulting in approximately 180 µg L-1 plasma concentration, and the 4.4- to 8.9-fold higher lethal plasma concentrations we found in cases of e-liquid intoxication. In these severe intoxications, plasma cotinine concentration does not act as a more reliable indicator of nicotine intoxication than nicotine itself. The ages of the patients display a bimodal distribution. In patients above the age of 10, intoxication results mainly from suicide attempts rather than accidental ingestion. The role of PG and VG in e-liquid intoxications is remarkably unclear. However, the similarity across nicotine and PG toxicity symptoms leads us to believe a cumulative effect cannot be excluded.
