Factor VIII-specific B cell responses in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Development of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) provides a major complication of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia A. The risk of inhibitor formation is influenced by the underlying FVIII gene defect. Moreover, genetic determinants in the promoter region of IL-10 and TNFalpha have been linked to an increased risk of inhibitor development. Recent cohort-studies have provided evidence that the risk of inhibitor formation is linked to intensity of treatment. Eradication of FVIII inhibitors can be achieved by frequent infusion of high dosages of FVIII, so-called immune tolerance induction (ITI). Until now, the mechanisms involved in downmodulation of the immune response to FVIII during ITI have not been unraveled. Studies performed in an animal model for haemophilia A have suggested that elimination of FVIII-specific memory B cells by high dosages of FVIII contributes to the decline in FVIII inhibitor levels during ITI. Limited knowledge is available with respect to the development and persistence of FVIII-specific memory B cells in patients with haemophilia A. Two recent studies suggest that the frequency of peripheral FVIII-specific memory B cells in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors range from <0.01 to 0.40% of that of total IgG(+) B cells. No or very low frequencies of FVIII-specific memory B cells are observed in haemophilia A patients without inhibitors and in patients treated successfully by ITI. Possible implications of these findings are discussed in the context of currently available information on the role of antigen-specific memory B cells and long-living antibody producing plasma cells in humoral immunity.

Domain specificity of factor VIII inhibitors during immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Frequent administration of high dosages factor VIII (FVIII), so-called immune tolerance induction (ITI), provides an efficient strategy to eradicate inhibitory antibodies in patients with haemophilia A. At present, our knowledge on the characteristics of inhibitory antibodies in patients undergoing ITI is limited. AIM: In this study we characterized the domain specificity of FVIII inhibitors in 11 haemophilia A patients during ITI. RESULTS: In three of six patients who were successfully tolerized, inhibitory antibodies were directed predominantly against the FVIII light chain. In two other patients within this group, a significant contribution of A2 antibodies was observed which did not change during treatment. In the sixth patient the relative contribution of A2 inhibitors declined which coincided with an increase in antilight chain antibodies. In four of five patients who failed ITI, A2 inhibitors were observed. In two patients the contribution of A2 inhibitors increased during treatment, while in two other patients the contribution of A2 inhibitor remained constant. The fifth patient had inhibitory antibodies predominantly directed against the FVIII light chain. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings revealed changes in domain specificity of FVIII antibodies in five of 11 patients analysed. Remarkably, antibodies exclusively directed towards the light chain of FVIII were predominantly observed in patients who were successfully tolerized.